Forgetting null/base-case handling
Wrong move: Recursive traversal assumes children always exist.
Usually fails on: Leaf nodes throw errors or create wrong depth/path values.
Fix: Handle null/base cases before recursive transitions.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
We run a preorder depth-first search (DFS) on the root of a binary tree.
At each node in this traversal, we output D dashes (where D is the depth of this node), then we output the value of this node. If the depth of a node is D, the depth of its immediate child is D + 1. The depth of the root node is 0.
If a node has only one child, that child is guaranteed to be the left child.
Given the output traversal of this traversal, recover the tree and return its root.
Example 1:
Input: traversal = "1-2--3--4-5--6--7" Output: [1,2,5,3,4,6,7]
Example 2:
Input: traversal = "1-2--3---4-5--6---7" Output: [1,2,5,3,null,6,null,4,null,7]
Example 3:
Input: traversal = "1-401--349---90--88" Output: [1,401,null,349,88,90]
Constraints:
[1, 1000].1 <= Node.val <= 109Problem summary: We run a preorder depth-first search (DFS) on the root of a binary tree. At each node in this traversal, we output D dashes (where D is the depth of this node), then we output the value of this node. If the depth of a node is D, the depth of its immediate child is D + 1. The depth of the root node is 0. If a node has only one child, that child is guaranteed to be the left child. Given the output traversal of this traversal, recover the tree and return its root.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Tree
"1-2--3--4-5--6--7"
"1-2--3---4-5--6---7"
"1-401--349---90--88"
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1028: Recover a Tree From Preorder Traversal
/**
* Definition for a binary tree node.
* public class TreeNode {
* int val;
* TreeNode left;
* TreeNode right;
* TreeNode() {}
* TreeNode(int val) { this.val = val; }
* TreeNode(int val, TreeNode left, TreeNode right) {
* this.val = val;
* this.left = left;
* this.right = right;
* }
* }
*/
class Solution {
public TreeNode recoverFromPreorder(String traversal) {
Stack<TreeNode> stack = new Stack<>();
int i = 0;
while (i < traversal.length()) {
int depth = 0;
while (i < traversal.length() && traversal.charAt(i) == '-') {
depth++;
i++;
}
int num = 0;
while (i < traversal.length() && Character.isDigit(traversal.charAt(i))) {
num = num * 10 + (traversal.charAt(i) - '0');
i++;
}
// Create the new node
TreeNode newNode = new TreeNode(num);
while (stack.size() > depth) {
stack.pop();
}
if (!stack.isEmpty()) {
if (stack.peek().left == null) {
stack.peek().left = newNode;
} else {
stack.peek().right = newNode;
}
}
stack.push(newNode);
}
return stack.isEmpty() ? null : stack.get(0);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1028: Recover a Tree From Preorder Traversal
// Auto-generated Go example from java.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #1028: Recover a Tree From Preorder Traversal
// /**
// * Definition for a binary tree node.
// * public class TreeNode {
// * int val;
// * TreeNode left;
// * TreeNode right;
// * TreeNode() {}
// * TreeNode(int val) { this.val = val; }
// * TreeNode(int val, TreeNode left, TreeNode right) {
// * this.val = val;
// * this.left = left;
// * this.right = right;
// * }
// * }
// */
// class Solution {
// public TreeNode recoverFromPreorder(String traversal) {
// Stack<TreeNode> stack = new Stack<>();
// int i = 0;
//
// while (i < traversal.length()) {
// int depth = 0;
// while (i < traversal.length() && traversal.charAt(i) == '-') {
// depth++;
// i++;
// }
//
// int num = 0;
// while (i < traversal.length() && Character.isDigit(traversal.charAt(i))) {
// num = num * 10 + (traversal.charAt(i) - '0');
// i++;
// }
//
// // Create the new node
// TreeNode newNode = new TreeNode(num);
//
// while (stack.size() > depth) {
// stack.pop();
// }
// if (!stack.isEmpty()) {
// if (stack.peek().left == null) {
// stack.peek().left = newNode;
// } else {
// stack.peek().right = newNode;
// }
// }
//
// stack.push(newNode);
// }
// return stack.isEmpty() ? null : stack.get(0);
// }
// }
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1028: Recover a Tree From Preorder Traversal
class Solution:
def recoverFromPreorder(self, traversal: str) -> TreeNode | None:
i = 0
def recoverFromPreorder(depth: int) -> TreeNode | None:
nonlocal i
nDashes = 0
while i + nDashes < len(traversal) and traversal[i + nDashes] == '-':
nDashes += 1
if nDashes != depth:
return None
i += depth
start = i
while i < len(traversal) and traversal[i].isdigit():
i += 1
return TreeNode(int(traversal[start:i]),
recoverFromPreorder(depth + 1),
recoverFromPreorder(depth + 1))
return recoverFromPreorder(0)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1028: Recover a Tree From Preorder Traversal
struct Solution;
use rustgym_util::*;
use std::iter::Peekable;
use std::str::Chars;
use std::vec::IntoIter;
enum Tok {
N(i32),
D(usize),
}
trait Preorder {
fn parse(it: &mut Peekable<IntoIter<Tok>>, depth: usize) -> TreeLink;
fn parse_root(it: &mut Peekable<IntoIter<Tok>>) -> TreeLink;
}
impl Preorder for TreeLink {
fn parse(it: &mut Peekable<IntoIter<Tok>>, depth: usize) -> TreeLink {
if let Some(&Tok::D(d)) = it.peek() {
if d == depth {
it.next();
if let Some(Tok::N(n)) = it.next() {
TreeLink::branch(n, TreeLink::parse(it, d + 1), TreeLink::parse(it, d + 1))
} else {
None
}
} else {
None
}
} else {
None
}
}
fn parse_root(it: &mut Peekable<IntoIter<Tok>>) -> TreeLink {
if let Some(Tok::N(n)) = it.next() {
TreeLink::branch(n, TreeLink::parse(it, 1), TreeLink::parse(it, 1))
} else {
None
}
}
}
impl Solution {
fn recover_from_preorder(s: String) -> TreeLink {
let toks: Vec<Tok> = Self::parse_tokens(&mut s.chars().peekable());
TreeLink::parse_root(&mut toks.into_iter().peekable())
}
fn parse_tokens(it: &mut Peekable<Chars>) -> Vec<Tok> {
let mut toks: Vec<Tok> = vec![];
while let Some(c) = it.next() {
match c {
'-' => {
let mut d = 1;
while let Some('-') = it.peek() {
it.next();
d += 1;
}
toks.push(Tok::D(d));
}
'0'..='9' => {
let mut n = (c as u8 - b'0') as i32;
while let Some('0'..='9') = it.peek() {
n *= 10;
n += (it.next().unwrap() as u8 - b'0') as i32;
}
toks.push(Tok::N(n));
}
_ => {}
}
}
toks
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let s = "1-2--3--4-5--6--7".to_string();
let res = tree!(
1,
tree!(2, tree!(3), tree!(4)),
tree!(5, tree!(6), tree!(7))
);
assert_eq!(Solution::recover_from_preorder(s), res);
let s = "1-2--3---4-5--6---7".to_string();
let res = tree!(
1,
tree!(2, tree!(3, tree!(4), None), None),
tree!(5, tree!(6, tree!(7), None), None)
);
assert_eq!(Solution::recover_from_preorder(s), res);
let s = "1-401--349---90--88".to_string();
let res = tree!(1, tree!(401, tree!(349, tree!(90), None), tree!(88)), None);
assert_eq!(Solution::recover_from_preorder(s), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1028: Recover a Tree From Preorder Traversal
function recoverFromPreorder(traversal: string): TreeNode | null {
const stack: TreeNode[] = [];
let i = 0;
while (i < traversal.length) {
let depth = 0;
while (i < traversal.length && traversal[i] === '-') {
depth++;
i++;
}
let num = 0;
while (i < traversal.length && !Number.isNaN(+traversal[i])) {
num = num * 10 + +traversal[i];
i++;
}
// Create the new node
const newNode = new TreeNode(num);
while (stack.length > depth) {
stack.pop();
}
if (stack.length > 0) {
const i = stack.length - 1;
if (stack[i].left === null) {
stack[i].left = newNode;
} else {
stack[i].right = newNode;
}
}
stack.push(newNode);
}
return stack.length ? stack[0] : null;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
BFS with a queue visits every node exactly once — O(n) time. The queue may hold an entire level of the tree, which for a complete binary tree is up to n/2 nodes = O(n) space. This is optimal in time but costly in space for wide trees.
Every node is visited exactly once, giving O(n) time. Space depends on tree shape: O(h) for recursive DFS (stack depth = height h), or O(w) for BFS (queue width = widest level). For balanced trees h = log n; for skewed trees h = n.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Recursive traversal assumes children always exist.
Usually fails on: Leaf nodes throw errors or create wrong depth/path values.
Fix: Handle null/base cases before recursive transitions.