Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an array of words where each word consists of lowercase English letters.
wordA is a predecessor of wordB if and only if we can insert exactly one letter anywhere in wordA without changing the order of the other characters to make it equal to wordB.
"abc" is a predecessor of "abac", while "cba" is not a predecessor of "bcad".A word chain is a sequence of words [word1, word2, ..., wordk] with k >= 1, where word1 is a predecessor of word2, word2 is a predecessor of word3, and so on. A single word is trivially a word chain with k == 1.
Return the length of the longest possible word chain with words chosen from the given list of words.
Example 1:
Input: words = ["a","b","ba","bca","bda","bdca"] Output: 4 Explanation: One of the longest word chains is ["a","ba","bda","bdca"].
Example 2:
Input: words = ["xbc","pcxbcf","xb","cxbc","pcxbc"] Output: 5 Explanation: All the words can be put in a word chain ["xb", "xbc", "cxbc", "pcxbc", "pcxbcf"].
Example 3:
Input: words = ["abcd","dbqca"] Output: 1 Explanation: The trivial word chain ["abcd"] is one of the longest word chains. ["abcd","dbqca"] is not a valid word chain because the ordering of the letters is changed.
Constraints:
1 <= words.length <= 10001 <= words[i].length <= 16words[i] only consists of lowercase English letters.Problem summary: You are given an array of words where each word consists of lowercase English letters. wordA is a predecessor of wordB if and only if we can insert exactly one letter anywhere in wordA without changing the order of the other characters to make it equal to wordB. For example, "abc" is a predecessor of "abac", while "cba" is not a predecessor of "bcad". A word chain is a sequence of words [word1, word2, ..., wordk] with k >= 1, where word1 is a predecessor of word2, word2 is a predecessor of word3, and so on. A single word is trivially a word chain with k == 1. Return the length of the longest possible word chain with words chosen from the given list of words.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map · Two Pointers · Dynamic Programming
["a","b","ba","bca","bda","bdca"]
["xbc","pcxbcf","xb","cxbc","pcxbc"]
["abcd","dbqca"]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1048: Longest String Chain
class Solution {
public int longestStrChain(String[] words) {
Arrays.sort(words, Comparator.comparingInt(String::length));
int res = 0;
Map<String, Integer> map = new HashMap<>();
for (String word : words) {
int x = 1;
for (int i = 0; i < word.length(); ++i) {
String pre = word.substring(0, i) + word.substring(i + 1);
x = Math.max(x, map.getOrDefault(pre, 0) + 1);
}
map.put(word, x);
res = Math.max(res, x);
}
return res;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1048: Longest String Chain
func longestStrChain(words []string) int {
sort.Slice(words, func(i, j int) bool { return len(words[i]) < len(words[j]) })
res := 0
mp := make(map[string]int)
for _, word := range words {
x := 1
for i := 0; i < len(word); i++ {
pre := word[0:i] + word[i+1:len(word)]
x = max(x, mp[pre]+1)
}
mp[word] = x
res = max(res, x)
}
return res
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1048: Longest String Chain
class Solution:
def longestStrChain(self, words: List[str]) -> int:
def check(w1, w2):
if len(w2) - len(w1) != 1:
return False
i = j = cnt = 0
while i < len(w1) and j < len(w2):
if w1[i] != w2[j]:
cnt += 1
else:
i += 1
j += 1
return cnt < 2 and i == len(w1)
n = len(words)
dp = [1] * (n + 1)
words.sort(key=lambda x: len(x))
res = 1
for i in range(1, n):
for j in range(i):
if check(words[j], words[i]):
dp[i] = max(dp[i], dp[j] + 1)
res = max(res, dp[i])
return res
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1048: Longest String Chain
use std::collections::HashMap;
impl Solution {
#[allow(dead_code)]
pub fn longest_str_chain(words: Vec<String>) -> i32 {
let mut words = words;
let mut ret = 0;
let mut map: HashMap<String, i32> = HashMap::new();
// Sort the words vector first
words.sort_by(|lhs, rhs| lhs.len().cmp(&rhs.len()));
// Begin the "dp" process
for w in words.iter() {
let n = w.len();
let mut x = 1;
for i in 0..n {
let s = w[..i].to_string() + &w[i + 1..];
let v = map.entry(s.clone()).or_default();
x = std::cmp::max(x, *v + 1);
}
map.insert(w.clone(), x);
ret = std::cmp::max(ret, x);
}
ret
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1048: Longest String Chain
function longestStrChain(words: string[]): number {
words.sort((a, b) => a.length - b.length);
let ans = 0;
let hashTable = new Map();
for (let word of words) {
let c = 1;
for (let i = 0; i < word.length; i++) {
let pre = word.substring(0, i) + word.substring(i + 1);
c = Math.max(c, (hashTable.get(pre) || 0) + 1);
}
hashTable.set(word, c);
ans = Math.max(ans, c);
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair of elements. The outer loop picks one element, the inner loop scans the rest. For n elements that is n × (n−1)/2 comparisons = O(n²). No extra memory — just two loop variables.
Each pointer traverses the array at most once. With two pointers moving inward (or both moving right), the total number of steps is bounded by n. Each comparison is O(1), giving O(n) overall. No auxiliary data structures are needed — just two index variables.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.
Wrong move: Advancing both pointers shrinks the search space too aggressively and skips candidates.
Usually fails on: A valid pair can be skipped when only one side should move.
Fix: Move exactly one pointer per decision branch based on invariant.
Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.
Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.
Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.