Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
There is a bookstore owner that has a store open for n minutes. You are given an integer array customers of length n where customers[i] is the number of the customers that enter the store at the start of the ith minute and all those customers leave after the end of that minute.
During certain minutes, the bookstore owner is grumpy. You are given a binary array grumpy where grumpy[i] is 1 if the bookstore owner is grumpy during the ith minute, and is 0 otherwise.
When the bookstore owner is grumpy, the customers entering during that minute are not satisfied. Otherwise, they are satisfied.
The bookstore owner knows a secret technique to remain not grumpy for minutes consecutive minutes, but this technique can only be used once.
Return the maximum number of customers that can be satisfied throughout the day.
Example 1:
Input: customers = [1,0,1,2,1,1,7,5], grumpy = [0,1,0,1,0,1,0,1], minutes = 3
Output: 16
Explanation:
The bookstore owner keeps themselves not grumpy for the last 3 minutes.
The maximum number of customers that can be satisfied = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 7 + 5 = 16.
Example 2:
Input: customers = [1], grumpy = [0], minutes = 1
Output: 1
Constraints:
n == customers.length == grumpy.length1 <= minutes <= n <= 2 * 1040 <= customers[i] <= 1000grumpy[i] is either 0 or 1.Problem summary: There is a bookstore owner that has a store open for n minutes. You are given an integer array customers of length n where customers[i] is the number of the customers that enter the store at the start of the ith minute and all those customers leave after the end of that minute. During certain minutes, the bookstore owner is grumpy. You are given a binary array grumpy where grumpy[i] is 1 if the bookstore owner is grumpy during the ith minute, and is 0 otherwise. When the bookstore owner is grumpy, the customers entering during that minute are not satisfied. Otherwise, they are satisfied. The bookstore owner knows a secret technique to remain not grumpy for minutes consecutive minutes, but this technique can only be used once. Return the maximum number of customers that can be satisfied throughout the day.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Sliding Window
[1,0,1,2,1,1,7,5] [0,1,0,1,0,1,0,1] 3
[1] [0] 1
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1052: Grumpy Bookstore Owner
class Solution {
public int maxSatisfied(int[] customers, int[] grumpy, int minutes) {
int cnt = 0;
int tot = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < minutes; ++i) {
cnt += customers[i] * grumpy[i];
tot += customers[i] * (grumpy[i] ^ 1);
}
int mx = cnt;
int n = customers.length;
for (int i = minutes; i < n; ++i) {
cnt += customers[i] * grumpy[i];
cnt -= customers[i - minutes] * grumpy[i - minutes];
mx = Math.max(mx, cnt);
tot += customers[i] * (grumpy[i] ^ 1);
}
return tot + mx;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1052: Grumpy Bookstore Owner
func maxSatisfied(customers []int, grumpy []int, minutes int) int {
var cnt, tot int
for i, c := range customers[:minutes] {
cnt += c * grumpy[i]
tot += c * (grumpy[i] ^ 1)
}
mx := cnt
for i := minutes; i < len(customers); i++ {
cnt += customers[i] * grumpy[i]
cnt -= customers[i-minutes] * grumpy[i-minutes]
mx = max(mx, cnt)
tot += customers[i] * (grumpy[i] ^ 1)
}
return tot + mx
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1052: Grumpy Bookstore Owner
class Solution:
def maxSatisfied(
self, customers: List[int], grumpy: List[int], minutes: int
) -> int:
mx = cnt = sum(c * g for c, g in zip(customers[:minutes], grumpy))
for i in range(minutes, len(customers)):
cnt += customers[i] * grumpy[i]
cnt -= customers[i - minutes] * grumpy[i - minutes]
mx = max(mx, cnt)
return sum(c * (g ^ 1) for c, g in zip(customers, grumpy)) + mx
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1052: Grumpy Bookstore Owner
impl Solution {
pub fn max_satisfied(customers: Vec<i32>, grumpy: Vec<i32>, minutes: i32) -> i32 {
let mut cnt = 0;
let mut tot = 0;
let minutes = minutes as usize;
for i in 0..minutes {
cnt += customers[i] * grumpy[i];
tot += customers[i] * (1 - grumpy[i]);
}
let mut mx = cnt;
let n = customers.len();
for i in minutes..n {
cnt += customers[i] * grumpy[i];
cnt -= customers[i - minutes] * grumpy[i - minutes];
mx = mx.max(cnt);
tot += customers[i] * (1 - grumpy[i]);
}
tot + mx
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1052: Grumpy Bookstore Owner
function maxSatisfied(customers: number[], grumpy: number[], minutes: number): number {
let [cnt, tot] = [0, 0];
for (let i = 0; i < minutes; ++i) {
cnt += customers[i] * grumpy[i];
tot += customers[i] * (grumpy[i] ^ 1);
}
let mx = cnt;
for (let i = minutes; i < customers.length; ++i) {
cnt += customers[i] * grumpy[i];
cnt -= customers[i - minutes] * grumpy[i - minutes];
mx = Math.max(mx, cnt);
tot += customers[i] * (grumpy[i] ^ 1);
}
return tot + mx;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
For each starting index, scan the next k elements to compute the window aggregate. There are n−k+1 starting positions, each requiring O(k) work, giving O(n × k) total. No extra space since we recompute from scratch each time.
The window expands and contracts as we scan left to right. Each element enters the window at most once and leaves at most once, giving 2n total operations = O(n). Space depends on what we track inside the window (a hash map of at most k distinct elements, or O(1) for a fixed-size window).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Using `if` instead of `while` leaves the window invalid for multiple iterations.
Usually fails on: Over-limit windows stay invalid and produce wrong lengths/counts.
Fix: Shrink in a `while` loop until the invariant is valid again.