Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
You are given an array prices where prices[i] is the price of a given stock on the ith day.
Find the maximum profit you can achieve. You may complete at most two transactions.
Note: You may not engage in multiple transactions simultaneously (i.e., you must sell the stock before you buy again).
Example 1:
Input: prices = [3,3,5,0,0,3,1,4] Output: 6 Explanation: Buy on day 4 (price = 0) and sell on day 6 (price = 3), profit = 3-0 = 3. Then buy on day 7 (price = 1) and sell on day 8 (price = 4), profit = 4-1 = 3.
Example 2:
Input: prices = [1,2,3,4,5] Output: 4 Explanation: Buy on day 1 (price = 1) and sell on day 5 (price = 5), profit = 5-1 = 4. Note that you cannot buy on day 1, buy on day 2 and sell them later, as you are engaging multiple transactions at the same time. You must sell before buying again.
Example 3:
Input: prices = [7,6,4,3,1] Output: 0 Explanation: In this case, no transaction is done, i.e. max profit = 0.
Constraints:
1 <= prices.length <= 1050 <= prices[i] <= 105Problem summary: You are given an array prices where prices[i] is the price of a given stock on the ith day. Find the maximum profit you can achieve. You may complete at most two transactions. Note: You may not engage in multiple transactions simultaneously (i.e., you must sell the stock before you buy again).
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Dynamic Programming
[3,3,5,0,0,3,1,4]
[1,2,3,4,5]
[7,6,4,3,1]
best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock)best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-ii)best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-iv)maximum-sum-of-3-non-overlapping-subarrays)maximum-profit-from-trading-stocks)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #123: Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock III
class Solution {
public int maxProfit(int[] prices) {
// 第一次买入,第一次卖出,第二次买入,第二次卖出
int f1 = -prices[0], f2 = 0, f3 = -prices[0], f4 = 0;
for (int i = 1; i < prices.length; ++i) {
f1 = Math.max(f1, -prices[i]);
f2 = Math.max(f2, f1 + prices[i]);
f3 = Math.max(f3, f2 - prices[i]);
f4 = Math.max(f4, f3 + prices[i]);
}
return f4;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #123: Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock III
func maxProfit(prices []int) int {
f1, f2, f3, f4 := -prices[0], 0, -prices[0], 0
for i := 1; i < len(prices); i++ {
f1 = max(f1, -prices[i])
f2 = max(f2, f1+prices[i])
f3 = max(f3, f2-prices[i])
f4 = max(f4, f3+prices[i])
}
return f4
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #123: Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock III
class Solution:
def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int]) -> int:
# 第一次买入,第一次卖出,第二次买入,第二次卖出
f1, f2, f3, f4 = -prices[0], 0, -prices[0], 0
for price in prices[1:]:
f1 = max(f1, -price)
f2 = max(f2, f1 + price)
f3 = max(f3, f2 - price)
f4 = max(f4, f3 + price)
return f4
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #123: Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock III
impl Solution {
#[allow(dead_code)]
pub fn max_profit(prices: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let mut f1 = -prices[0];
let mut f2 = 0;
let mut f3 = -prices[0];
let mut f4 = 0;
let n = prices.len();
for i in 1..n {
f1 = std::cmp::max(f1, -prices[i]);
f2 = std::cmp::max(f2, f1 + prices[i]);
f3 = std::cmp::max(f3, f2 - prices[i]);
f4 = std::cmp::max(f4, f3 + prices[i]);
}
f4
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #123: Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock III
function maxProfit(prices: number[]): number {
let [f1, f2, f3, f4] = [-prices[0], 0, -prices[0], 0];
for (let i = 1; i < prices.length; ++i) {
f1 = Math.max(f1, -prices[i]);
f2 = Math.max(f2, f1 + prices[i]);
f3 = Math.max(f3, f2 - prices[i]);
f4 = Math.max(f4, f3 + prices[i]);
}
return f4;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.
Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.
Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.
Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.