Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
On a 2D plane, there are n points with integer coordinates points[i] = [xi, yi]. Return the minimum time in seconds to visit all the points in the order given by points.
You can move according to these rules:
1 second, you can either:
sqrt(2) units (in other words, move one unit vertically then one unit horizontally in 1 second).Example 1:
Input: points = [[1,1],[3,4],[-1,0]] Output: 7 Explanation: One optimal path is [1,1] -> [2,2] -> [3,3] -> [3,4] -> [2,3] -> [1,2] -> [0,1] -> [-1,0] Time from [1,1] to [3,4] = 3 seconds Time from [3,4] to [-1,0] = 4 seconds Total time = 7 seconds
Example 2:
Input: points = [[3,2],[-2,2]] Output: 5
Constraints:
points.length == n1 <= n <= 100points[i].length == 2-1000 <= points[i][0], points[i][1] <= 1000Problem summary: On a 2D plane, there are n points with integer coordinates points[i] = [xi, yi]. Return the minimum time in seconds to visit all the points in the order given by points. You can move according to these rules: In 1 second, you can either: move vertically by one unit, move horizontally by one unit, or move diagonally sqrt(2) units (in other words, move one unit vertically then one unit horizontally in 1 second). You have to visit the points in the same order as they appear in the array. You are allowed to pass through points that appear later in the order, but these do not count as visits.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Math
[[1,1],[3,4],[-1,0]]
[[3,2],[-2,2]]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1266: Minimum Time Visiting All Points
class Solution {
public int minTimeToVisitAllPoints(int[][] points) {
int ans = 0;
for (int i = 1; i < points.length; ++i) {
int dx = Math.abs(points[i][0] - points[i - 1][0]);
int dy = Math.abs(points[i][1] - points[i - 1][1]);
ans += Math.max(dx, dy);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1266: Minimum Time Visiting All Points
func minTimeToVisitAllPoints(points [][]int) (ans int) {
for i, p := range points[1:] {
dx := abs(p[0] - points[i][0])
dy := abs(p[1] - points[i][1])
ans += max(dx, dy)
}
return
}
func abs(x int) int {
if x < 0 {
return -x
}
return x
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1266: Minimum Time Visiting All Points
class Solution:
def minTimeToVisitAllPoints(self, points: List[List[int]]) -> int:
return sum(
max(abs(p1[0] - p2[0]), abs(p1[1] - p2[1])) for p1, p2 in pairwise(points)
)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1266: Minimum Time Visiting All Points
impl Solution {
pub fn min_time_to_visit_all_points(points: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> i32 {
let mut ans = 0;
for i in 1..points.len() {
let dx = (points[i][0] - points[i - 1][0]).abs();
let dy = (points[i][1] - points[i - 1][1]).abs();
ans += dx.max(dy);
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1266: Minimum Time Visiting All Points
function minTimeToVisitAllPoints(points: number[][]): number {
let ans = 0;
for (let i = 1; i < points.length; i++) {
const dx = Math.abs(points[i][0] - points[i - 1][0]);
const dy = Math.abs(points[i][1] - points[i - 1][1]);
ans += Math.max(dx, dy);
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.