Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
We are given a list nums of integers representing a list compressed with run-length encoding.
Consider each adjacent pair of elements [freq, val] = [nums[2*i], nums[2*i+1]] (with i >= 0). For each such pair, there are freq elements with value val concatenated in a sublist. Concatenate all the sublists from left to right to generate the decompressed list.
Return the decompressed list.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,3,4] Output: [2,4,4,4] Explanation: The first pair [1,2] means we have freq = 1 and val = 2 so we generate the array [2]. The second pair [3,4] means we have freq = 3 and val = 4 so we generate [4,4,4]. At the end the concatenation [2] + [4,4,4] is [2,4,4,4].
Example 2:
Input: nums = [1,1,2,3] Output: [1,3,3]
Constraints:
2 <= nums.length <= 100nums.length % 2 == 01 <= nums[i] <= 100Problem summary: We are given a list nums of integers representing a list compressed with run-length encoding. Consider each adjacent pair of elements [freq, val] = [nums[2*i], nums[2*i+1]] (with i >= 0). For each such pair, there are freq elements with value val concatenated in a sublist. Concatenate all the sublists from left to right to generate the decompressed list. Return the decompressed list.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[1,2,3,4]
[1,1,2,3]
string-compression)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1313: Decompress Run-Length Encoded List
class Solution {
public int[] decompressRLElist(int[] nums) {
List<Integer> ans = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i += 2) {
for (int j = 0; j < nums[i]; ++j) {
ans.add(nums[i + 1]);
}
}
return ans.stream().mapToInt(i -> i).toArray();
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1313: Decompress Run-Length Encoded List
func decompressRLElist(nums []int) (ans []int) {
for i := 1; i < len(nums); i += 2 {
for j := 0; j < nums[i-1]; j++ {
ans = append(ans, nums[i])
}
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1313: Decompress Run-Length Encoded List
class Solution:
def decompressRLElist(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[int]:
return [nums[i + 1] for i in range(0, len(nums), 2) for _ in range(nums[i])]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1313: Decompress Run-Length Encoded List
impl Solution {
pub fn decompress_rl_elist(nums: Vec<i32>) -> Vec<i32> {
let mut ans = Vec::new();
let n = nums.len();
let mut i = 0;
while i < n {
let freq = nums[i];
let val = nums[i + 1];
for _ in 0..freq {
ans.push(val);
}
i += 2;
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1313: Decompress Run-Length Encoded List
function decompressRLElist(nums: number[]): number[] {
const ans: number[] = [];
for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i += 2) {
for (let j = 0; j < nums[i]; j++) {
ans.push(nums[i + 1]);
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.