Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on core interview patterns fundamentals.
Table: Products
+------------------+---------+ | Column Name | Type | +------------------+---------+ | product_id | int | | product_name | varchar | | product_category | varchar | +------------------+---------+ product_id is the primary key (column with unique values) for this table. This table contains data about the company's products.
Table: Orders
+---------------+---------+ | Column Name | Type | +---------------+---------+ | product_id | int | | order_date | date | | unit | int | +---------------+---------+ This table may have duplicate rows. product_id is a foreign key (reference column) to the Products table. unit is the number of products ordered in order_date.
Write a solution to get the names of products that have at least 100 units ordered in February 2020 and their amount.
Return the result table in any order.
The result format is in the following example.
Example 1:
Input: Products table: +-------------+-----------------------+------------------+ | product_id | product_name | product_category | +-------------+-----------------------+------------------+ | 1 | Leetcode Solutions | Book | | 2 | Jewels of Stringology | Book | | 3 | HP | Laptop | | 4 | Lenovo | Laptop | | 5 | Leetcode Kit | T-shirt | +-------------+-----------------------+------------------+ Orders table: +--------------+--------------+----------+ | product_id | order_date | unit | +--------------+--------------+----------+ | 1 | 2020-02-05 | 60 | | 1 | 2020-02-10 | 70 | | 2 | 2020-01-18 | 30 | | 2 | 2020-02-11 | 80 | | 3 | 2020-02-17 | 2 | | 3 | 2020-02-24 | 3 | | 4 | 2020-03-01 | 20 | | 4 | 2020-03-04 | 30 | | 4 | 2020-03-04 | 60 | | 5 | 2020-02-25 | 50 | | 5 | 2020-02-27 | 50 | | 5 | 2020-03-01 | 50 | +--------------+--------------+----------+ Output: +--------------------+---------+ | product_name | unit | +--------------------+---------+ | Leetcode Solutions | 130 | | Leetcode Kit | 100 | +--------------------+---------+ Explanation: Products with product_id = 1 is ordered in February a total of (60 + 70) = 130. Products with product_id = 2 is ordered in February a total of 80. Products with product_id = 3 is ordered in February a total of (2 + 3) = 5. Products with product_id = 4 was not ordered in February 2020. Products with product_id = 5 is ordered in February a total of (50 + 50) = 100.
Problem summary: Table: Products +------------------+---------+ | Column Name | Type | +------------------+---------+ | product_id | int | | product_name | varchar | | product_category | varchar | +------------------+---------+ product_id is the primary key (column with unique values) for this table. This table contains data about the company's products. Table: Orders +---------------+---------+ | Column Name | Type | +---------------+---------+ | product_id | int | | order_date | date | | unit | int | +---------------+---------+ This table may have duplicate rows. product_id is a foreign key (reference column) to the Products table. unit is the number of products ordered in order_date. Write a solution to get the names of products that have at least 100 units ordered in February 2020 and their amount. Return the result table in any order. The result format is in the following example.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
{"headers": {"Products": ["product_id", "product_name", "product_category"], "Orders": ["product_id", "order_date", "unit"]}, "rows": {"Products": [[1, "Leetcode Solutions", "Book"], [2, "Jewels of Stringology", "Book"], [3, "HP", "Laptop"], [4, "Lenovo", "Laptop"], [5, "Leetcode Kit", "T-shirt"]], "Orders": [[1, "2020-02-05", 60], [1, "2020-02-10", 70], [2, "2020-01-18", 30], [2, "2020-02-11", 80], [3, "2020-02-17", 2], [3, "2020-02-24", 3], [4, "2020-03-01", 20], [4, "2020-03-04", 30], [4, "2020-03-04", 60], [5, "2020-02-25", 50], [5, "2020-02-27", 50], [5, "2020-03-01", 50]]}}Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
// Auto-generated Java example from rust.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (rust):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
// pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
// r#"
// -- Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
// # Write your MySQL query statement below
// SELECT product_name, SUM(unit) AS unit
// FROM
// Orders AS o
// JOIN Products AS p ON o.product_id = p.product_id
// WHERE DATE_FORMAT(order_date, '%Y-%m') = '2020-02'
// GROUP BY o.product_id
// HAVING unit >= 100;
// "#
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
// Auto-generated Go example from rust.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (rust):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
// pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
// r#"
// -- Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
// # Write your MySQL query statement below
// SELECT product_name, SUM(unit) AS unit
// FROM
// Orders AS o
// JOIN Products AS p ON o.product_id = p.product_id
// WHERE DATE_FORMAT(order_date, '%Y-%m') = '2020-02'
// GROUP BY o.product_id
// HAVING unit >= 100;
// "#
// }
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
# Auto-generated Python example from rust.
def example_solution() -> None:
return
# Reference (rust):
# // Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
# pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
# r#"
# -- Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
# # Write your MySQL query statement below
# SELECT product_name, SUM(unit) AS unit
# FROM
# Orders AS o
# JOIN Products AS p ON o.product_id = p.product_id
# WHERE DATE_FORMAT(order_date, '%Y-%m') = '2020-02'
# GROUP BY o.product_id
# HAVING unit >= 100;
# "#
# }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
r#"
-- Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
# Write your MySQL query statement below
SELECT product_name, SUM(unit) AS unit
FROM
Orders AS o
JOIN Products AS p ON o.product_id = p.product_id
WHERE DATE_FORMAT(order_date, '%Y-%m') = '2020-02'
GROUP BY o.product_id
HAVING unit >= 100;
"#
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from rust.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (rust):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
// pub fn sql_example() -> &'static str {
// r#"
// -- Accepted solution for LeetCode #1327: List the Products Ordered in a Period
// # Write your MySQL query statement below
// SELECT product_name, SUM(unit) AS unit
// FROM
// Orders AS o
// JOIN Products AS p ON o.product_id = p.product_id
// WHERE DATE_FORMAT(order_date, '%Y-%m') = '2020-02'
// GROUP BY o.product_id
// HAVING unit >= 100;
// "#
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.