Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
Given an array of integers arr, replace each element with its rank.
The rank represents how large the element is. The rank has the following rules:
Example 1:
Input: arr = [40,10,20,30] Output: [4,1,2,3] Explanation: 40 is the largest element. 10 is the smallest. 20 is the second smallest. 30 is the third smallest.
Example 2:
Input: arr = [100,100,100] Output: [1,1,1] Explanation: Same elements share the same rank.
Example 3:
Input: arr = [37,12,28,9,100,56,80,5,12] Output: [5,3,4,2,8,6,7,1,3]
Constraints:
0 <= arr.length <= 105-109 <= arr[i] <= 109Problem summary: Given an array of integers arr, replace each element with its rank. The rank represents how large the element is. The rank has the following rules: Rank is an integer starting from 1. The larger the element, the larger the rank. If two elements are equal, their rank must be the same. Rank should be as small as possible.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map
[40,10,20,30]
[100,100,100]
[37,12,28,9,100,56,80,5,12]
rank-transform-of-a-matrix)find-target-indices-after-sorting-array)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1331: Rank Transform of an Array
class Solution {
public int[] arrayRankTransform(int[] arr) {
int n = arr.length;
int[] t = arr.clone();
Arrays.sort(t);
int m = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
if (i == 0 || t[i] != t[i - 1]) {
t[m++] = t[i];
}
}
int[] ans = new int[n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
ans[i] = Arrays.binarySearch(t, 0, m, arr[i]) + 1;
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1331: Rank Transform of an Array
func arrayRankTransform(arr []int) (ans []int) {
t := make([]int, len(arr))
copy(t, arr)
sort.Ints(t)
m := 0
for i, x := range t {
if i == 0 || x != t[i-1] {
t[m] = x
m++
}
}
t = t[:m]
for _, x := range arr {
ans = append(ans, sort.SearchInts(t, x)+1)
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1331: Rank Transform of an Array
class Solution:
def arrayRankTransform(self, arr: List[int]) -> List[int]:
t = sorted(set(arr))
return [bisect_right(t, x) for x in arr]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1331: Rank Transform of an Array
struct Solution;
use std::collections::BTreeSet;
use std::collections::HashMap;
impl Solution {
fn array_rank_transform(arr: Vec<i32>) -> Vec<i32> {
let mut bts: BTreeSet<i32> = BTreeSet::new();
let mut hm: HashMap<i32, i32> = HashMap::new();
for &x in &arr {
bts.insert(x);
}
for (i, x) in bts.into_iter().enumerate() {
hm.insert(x, i as i32 + 1);
}
arr.into_iter().map(|x| hm[&x]).collect()
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let arr = vec![40, 10, 20, 30];
let res = vec![4, 1, 2, 3];
assert_eq!(Solution::array_rank_transform(arr), res);
let arr = vec![100, 100, 100];
let res = vec![1, 1, 1];
assert_eq!(Solution::array_rank_transform(arr), res);
let arr = vec![37, 12, 28, 9, 100, 56, 80, 5, 12];
let res = vec![5, 3, 4, 2, 8, 6, 7, 1, 3];
assert_eq!(Solution::array_rank_transform(arr), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1331: Rank Transform of an Array
function arrayRankTransform(arr: number[]): number[] {
const t = [...arr].sort((a, b) => a - b);
let m = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < t.length; ++i) {
if (i === 0 || t[i] !== t[i - 1]) {
t[m++] = t[i];
}
}
const search = (t: number[], right: number, x: number) => {
let left = 0;
while (left < right) {
const mid = (left + right) >> 1;
if (t[mid] > x) {
right = mid;
} else {
left = mid + 1;
}
}
return left;
};
const ans: number[] = [];
for (const x of arr) {
ans.push(search(t, m, x));
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.