Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using bit manipulation strategy.
Given the binary representation of an integer as a string s, return the number of steps to reduce it to 1 under the following rules:
If the current number is even, you have to divide it by 2.
If the current number is odd, you have to add 1 to it.
It is guaranteed that you can always reach one for all test cases.
Example 1:
Input: s = "1101" Output: 6 Explanation: "1101" corressponds to number 13 in their decimal representation. Step 1) 13 is odd, add 1 and obtain 14. Step 2) 14 is even, divide by 2 and obtain 7. Step 3) 7 is odd, add 1 and obtain 8. Step 4) 8 is even, divide by 2 and obtain 4. Step 5) 4 is even, divide by 2 and obtain 2. Step 6) 2 is even, divide by 2 and obtain 1.
Example 2:
Input: s = "10" Output: 1 Explanation: "10" corresponds to number 2 in their decimal representation. Step 1) 2 is even, divide by 2 and obtain 1.
Example 3:
Input: s = "1" Output: 0
Constraints:
1 <= s.length <= 500s consists of characters '0' or '1's[0] == '1'Problem summary: Given the binary representation of an integer as a string s, return the number of steps to reduce it to 1 under the following rules: If the current number is even, you have to divide it by 2. If the current number is odd, you have to add 1 to it. It is guaranteed that you can always reach one for all test cases.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Bit Manipulation
"1101"
"10"
"1"
minimum-moves-to-reach-target-score)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1404: Number of Steps to Reduce a Number in Binary Representation to One
class Solution {
public int numSteps(String s) {
boolean carry = false;
int ans = 0;
for (int i = s.length() - 1; i > 0; --i) {
char c = s.charAt(i);
if (carry) {
if (c == '0') {
c = '1';
carry = false;
} else {
c = '0';
}
}
if (c == '1') {
++ans;
carry = true;
}
++ans;
}
if (carry) {
++ans;
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1404: Number of Steps to Reduce a Number in Binary Representation to One
func numSteps(s string) int {
ans := 0
carry := false
for i := len(s) - 1; i > 0; i-- {
c := s[i]
if carry {
if c == '0' {
c = '1'
carry = false
} else {
c = '0'
}
}
if c == '1' {
ans++
carry = true
}
ans++
}
if carry {
ans++
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1404: Number of Steps to Reduce a Number in Binary Representation to One
class Solution:
def numSteps(self, s: str) -> int:
carry = False
ans = 0
for c in s[:0:-1]:
if carry:
if c == '0':
c = '1'
carry = False
else:
c = '0'
if c == '1':
ans += 1
carry = True
ans += 1
if carry:
ans += 1
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1404: Number of Steps to Reduce a Number in Binary Representation to One
struct Solution;
impl Solution {
fn num_steps(s: String) -> i32 {
let mut carry = 0;
let mut res = 0;
let n = s.len();
let s: Vec<u8> = s.bytes().collect();
for i in (1..n).rev() {
res += 1;
if s[i] - b'0' + carry == 1 {
carry = 1;
res += 1;
}
}
res + carry as i32
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let s = "1101".to_string();
let res = 6;
assert_eq!(Solution::num_steps(s), res);
let s = "10".to_string();
let res = 1;
assert_eq!(Solution::num_steps(s), res);
let s = "1".to_string();
let res = 0;
assert_eq!(Solution::num_steps(s), res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1404: Number of Steps to Reduce a Number in Binary Representation to One
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from java.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #1404: Number of Steps to Reduce a Number in Binary Representation to One
// class Solution {
// public int numSteps(String s) {
// boolean carry = false;
// int ans = 0;
// for (int i = s.length() - 1; i > 0; --i) {
// char c = s.charAt(i);
// if (carry) {
// if (c == '0') {
// c = '1';
// carry = false;
// } else {
// c = '0';
// }
// }
// if (c == '1') {
// ++ans;
// carry = true;
// }
// ++ans;
// }
// if (carry) {
// ++ans;
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Sort the array in O(n log n), then scan for the missing or unique element by comparing adjacent pairs. Sorting requires O(n) auxiliary space (or O(1) with in-place sort but O(n log n) time remains). The sort step dominates.
Bitwise operations (AND, OR, XOR, shifts) are O(1) per operation on fixed-width integers. A single pass through the input with bit operations gives O(n) time. The key insight: XOR of a number with itself is 0, which eliminates duplicates without extra space.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.