Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
Given an array of integers arr and an integer k.
A value arr[i] is said to be stronger than a value arr[j] if |arr[i] - m| > |arr[j] - m| where m is the centre of the array.
If |arr[i] - m| == |arr[j] - m|, then arr[i] is said to be stronger than arr[j] if arr[i] > arr[j].
Return a list of the strongest k values in the array. return the answer in any arbitrary order.
The centre is the middle value in an ordered integer list. More formally, if the length of the list is n, the centre is the element in position ((n - 1) / 2) in the sorted list (0-indexed).
arr = [6, -3, 7, 2, 11], n = 5 and the centre is obtained by sorting the array arr = [-3, 2, 6, 7, 11] and the centre is arr[m] where m = ((5 - 1) / 2) = 2. The centre is 6.arr = [-7, 22, 17, 3], n = 4 and the centre is obtained by sorting the array arr = [-7, 3, 17, 22] and the centre is arr[m] where m = ((4 - 1) / 2) = 1. The centre is 3.Example 1:
Input: arr = [1,2,3,4,5], k = 2 Output: [5,1] Explanation: Centre is 3, the elements of the array sorted by the strongest are [5,1,4,2,3]. The strongest 2 elements are [5, 1]. [1, 5] is also accepted answer. Please note that although |5 - 3| == |1 - 3| but 5 is stronger than 1 because 5 > 1.
Example 2:
Input: arr = [1,1,3,5,5], k = 2 Output: [5,5] Explanation: Centre is 3, the elements of the array sorted by the strongest are [5,5,1,1,3]. The strongest 2 elements are [5, 5].
Example 3:
Input: arr = [6,7,11,7,6,8], k = 5 Output: [11,8,6,6,7] Explanation: Centre is 7, the elements of the array sorted by the strongest are [11,8,6,6,7,7]. Any permutation of [11,8,6,6,7] is accepted.
Constraints:
1 <= arr.length <= 105-105 <= arr[i] <= 1051 <= k <= arr.lengthProblem summary: Given an array of integers arr and an integer k. A value arr[i] is said to be stronger than a value arr[j] if |arr[i] - m| > |arr[j] - m| where m is the centre of the array. If |arr[i] - m| == |arr[j] - m|, then arr[i] is said to be stronger than arr[j] if arr[i] > arr[j]. Return a list of the strongest k values in the array. return the answer in any arbitrary order. The centre is the middle value in an ordered integer list. More formally, if the length of the list is n, the centre is the element in position ((n - 1) / 2) in the sorted list (0-indexed). For arr = [6, -3, 7, 2, 11], n = 5 and the centre is obtained by sorting the array arr = [-3, 2, 6, 7, 11] and the centre is arr[m] where m = ((5 - 1) / 2) = 2. The centre is 6. For arr = [-7, 22, 17, 3], n = 4 and the centre is obtained by sorting the array arr = [-7, 3, 17, 22] and the centre is arr[m] where m = ((4 - 1) / 2) = 1. The
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Two Pointers
[1,2,3,4,5] 2
[1,1,3,5,5] 2
[6,7,11,7,6,8] 5
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1471: The k Strongest Values in an Array
class Solution {
public int[] getStrongest(int[] arr, int k) {
Arrays.sort(arr);
int m = arr[(arr.length - 1) >> 1];
List<Integer> nums = new ArrayList<>();
for (int v : arr) {
nums.add(v);
}
nums.sort((a, b) -> {
int x = Math.abs(a - m);
int y = Math.abs(b - m);
return x == y ? b - a : y - x;
});
int[] ans = new int[k];
for (int i = 0; i < k; ++i) {
ans[i] = nums.get(i);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1471: The k Strongest Values in an Array
func getStrongest(arr []int, k int) []int {
sort.Ints(arr)
m := arr[(len(arr)-1)>>1]
sort.Slice(arr, func(i, j int) bool {
x, y := abs(arr[i]-m), abs(arr[j]-m)
if x == y {
return arr[i] > arr[j]
}
return x > y
})
return arr[:k]
}
func abs(x int) int {
if x < 0 {
return -x
}
return x
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1471: The k Strongest Values in an Array
class Solution:
def getStrongest(self, arr: List[int], k: int) -> List[int]:
arr.sort()
m = arr[(len(arr) - 1) >> 1]
arr.sort(key=lambda x: (-abs(x - m), -x))
return arr[:k]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1471: The k Strongest Values in an Array
struct Solution;
impl Solution {
fn get_strongest(mut arr: Vec<i32>, mut k: i32) -> Vec<i32> {
arr.sort_unstable();
let n = arr.len();
let median = arr[(n - 1) / 2];
let mut l = 0;
let mut r = n - 1;
let mut res = vec![];
while k > 0 {
if (arr[l] - median).abs() <= (arr[r] - median).abs() {
res.push(arr[r]);
r -= 1;
} else {
res.push(arr[l]);
l += 1;
}
k -= 1;
}
res
}
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let arr = vec![1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
let k = 2;
let mut res = vec![5, 1];
let mut ans = Solution::get_strongest(arr, k);
res.sort_unstable();
ans.sort_unstable();
assert_eq!(ans, res);
let arr = vec![1, 1, 3, 5, 5];
let k = 2;
let mut res = vec![5, 5];
let mut ans = Solution::get_strongest(arr, k);
res.sort_unstable();
ans.sort_unstable();
assert_eq!(ans, res);
let arr = vec![6, 7, 11, 7, 6, 8];
let k = 5;
let mut res = vec![11, 8, 6, 6, 7];
let mut ans = Solution::get_strongest(arr, k);
res.sort_unstable();
ans.sort_unstable();
assert_eq!(ans, res);
let arr = vec![6, -3, 7, 2, 11];
let k = 3;
let mut res = vec![-3, 11, 2];
let mut ans = Solution::get_strongest(arr, k);
res.sort_unstable();
ans.sort_unstable();
assert_eq!(ans, res);
let arr = vec![-7, 22, 17, 3];
let k = 2;
let mut res = vec![22, 17];
let mut ans = Solution::get_strongest(arr, k);
res.sort_unstable();
ans.sort_unstable();
assert_eq!(ans, res);
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1471: The k Strongest Values in an Array
function getStrongest(arr: number[], k: number): number[] {
arr.sort((a, b) => a - b);
const m = arr[(arr.length - 1) >> 1];
return arr.sort((a, b) => Math.abs(b - m) - Math.abs(a - m) || b - a).slice(0, k);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair of elements. The outer loop picks one element, the inner loop scans the rest. For n elements that is n × (n−1)/2 comparisons = O(n²). No extra memory — just two loop variables.
Each pointer traverses the array at most once. With two pointers moving inward (or both moving right), the total number of steps is bounded by n. Each comparison is O(1), giving O(n) overall. No auxiliary data structures are needed — just two index variables.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Advancing both pointers shrinks the search space too aggressively and skips candidates.
Usually fails on: A valid pair can be skipped when only one side should move.
Fix: Move exactly one pointer per decision branch based on invariant.