Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using core interview patterns strategy.
Table: Logs
+-------------+---------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+---------+ | id | int | | num | varchar | +-------------+---------+ In SQL, id is the primary key for this table. id is an autoincrement column starting from 1.
Find all numbers that appear at least three times consecutively.
Return the result table in any order.
The result format is in the following example.
Example 1:
Input: Logs table: +----+-----+ | id | num | +----+-----+ | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | | 4 | 2 | | 5 | 1 | | 6 | 2 | | 7 | 2 | +----+-----+ Output: +-----------------+ | ConsecutiveNums | +-----------------+ | 1 | +-----------------+ Explanation: 1 is the only number that appears consecutively for at least three times.
Problem summary: Table: Logs +-------------+---------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+---------+ | id | int | | num | varchar | +-------------+---------+ In SQL, id is the primary key for this table. id is an autoincrement column starting from 1. Find all numbers that appear at least three times consecutively. Return the result table in any order. The result format is in the following example.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
{"headers":{"Logs":["id","num"]},"rows":{"Logs":[[1,1],[2,1],[3,1],[4,2],[5,1],[6,2],[7,2]]}}Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #180: Consecutive Numbers
// Auto-generated Java example from py.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #180: Consecutive Numbers
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def consecutive_numbers(logs: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// all_the_same = lambda lst: lst.nunique() == 1
// logs["is_consecutive"] = (
// logs["num"].rolling(window=3, center=True, min_periods=3).apply(all_the_same)
// )
// return (
// logs.query("is_consecutive == 1.0")[["num"]]
// .drop_duplicates()
// .rename(columns={"num": "ConsecutiveNums"})
// )
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #180: Consecutive Numbers
// Auto-generated Go example from py.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #180: Consecutive Numbers
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def consecutive_numbers(logs: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// all_the_same = lambda lst: lst.nunique() == 1
// logs["is_consecutive"] = (
// logs["num"].rolling(window=3, center=True, min_periods=3).apply(all_the_same)
// )
// return (
// logs.query("is_consecutive == 1.0")[["num"]]
// .drop_duplicates()
// .rename(columns={"num": "ConsecutiveNums"})
// )
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #180: Consecutive Numbers
import pandas as pd
def consecutive_numbers(logs: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
all_the_same = lambda lst: lst.nunique() == 1
logs["is_consecutive"] = (
logs["num"].rolling(window=3, center=True, min_periods=3).apply(all_the_same)
)
return (
logs.query("is_consecutive == 1.0")[["num"]]
.drop_duplicates()
.rename(columns={"num": "ConsecutiveNums"})
)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #180: Consecutive Numbers
// Rust example auto-generated from py reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #180: Consecutive Numbers
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def consecutive_numbers(logs: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// all_the_same = lambda lst: lst.nunique() == 1
// logs["is_consecutive"] = (
// logs["num"].rolling(window=3, center=True, min_periods=3).apply(all_the_same)
// )
// return (
// logs.query("is_consecutive == 1.0")[["num"]]
// .drop_duplicates()
// .rename(columns={"num": "ConsecutiveNums"})
// )
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #180: Consecutive Numbers
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from py.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #180: Consecutive Numbers
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def consecutive_numbers(logs: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// all_the_same = lambda lst: lst.nunique() == 1
// logs["is_consecutive"] = (
// logs["num"].rolling(window=3, center=True, min_periods=3).apply(all_the_same)
// )
// return (
// logs.query("is_consecutive == 1.0")[["num"]]
// .drop_duplicates()
// .rename(columns={"num": "ConsecutiveNums"})
// )
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.