Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
Given an array of positive integers nums, return the maximum possible sum of an strictly increasing subarray in nums.
A subarray is defined as a contiguous sequence of numbers in an array.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [10,20,30,5,10,50] Output: 65 Explanation: [5,10,50] is the ascending subarray with the maximum sum of 65.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [10,20,30,40,50] Output: 150 Explanation: [10,20,30,40,50] is the ascending subarray with the maximum sum of 150.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [12,17,15,13,10,11,12] Output: 33 Explanation: [10,11,12] is the ascending subarray with the maximum sum of 33.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 1001 <= nums[i] <= 100Problem summary: Given an array of positive integers nums, return the maximum possible sum of an strictly increasing subarray in nums. A subarray is defined as a contiguous sequence of numbers in an array.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[10,20,30,5,10,50]
[10,20,30,40,50]
[12,17,15,13,10,11,12]
find-good-days-to-rob-the-bank)maximum-number-of-books-you-can-take)count-strictly-increasing-subarrays)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1800: Maximum Ascending Subarray Sum
class Solution {
public int maxAscendingSum(int[] nums) {
int ans = 0, t = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; ++i) {
if (i == 0 || nums[i] > nums[i - 1]) {
t += nums[i];
ans = Math.max(ans, t);
} else {
t = nums[i];
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1800: Maximum Ascending Subarray Sum
func maxAscendingSum(nums []int) int {
ans, t := 0, 0
for i, v := range nums {
if i == 0 || v > nums[i-1] {
t += v
if ans < t {
ans = t
}
} else {
t = v
}
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #1800: Maximum Ascending Subarray Sum
class Solution:
def maxAscendingSum(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
ans = t = 0
for i, v in enumerate(nums):
if i == 0 or v > nums[i - 1]:
t += v
ans = max(ans, t)
else:
t = v
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1800: Maximum Ascending Subarray Sum
impl Solution {
pub fn max_ascending_sum(nums: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let n = nums.len();
let mut res = nums[0];
let mut sum = nums[0];
for i in 1..n {
if nums[i - 1] >= nums[i] {
res = res.max(sum);
sum = 0;
}
sum += nums[i];
}
res.max(sum)
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #1800: Maximum Ascending Subarray Sum
function maxAscendingSum(nums: number[]): number {
const n = nums.length;
let res = nums[0];
let sum = nums[0];
for (let i = 1; i < n; i++) {
if (nums[i] <= nums[i - 1]) {
res = Math.max(res, sum);
sum = 0;
}
sum += nums[i];
}
return Math.max(res, sum);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.