LeetCode #2058 — MEDIUM

Find the Minimum and Maximum Number of Nodes Between Critical Points

Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using linked list strategy.

Solve on LeetCode
The Problem

Problem Statement

A critical point in a linked list is defined as either a local maxima or a local minima.

A node is a local maxima if the current node has a value strictly greater than the previous node and the next node.

A node is a local minima if the current node has a value strictly smaller than the previous node and the next node.

Note that a node can only be a local maxima/minima if there exists both a previous node and a next node.

Given a linked list head, return an array of length 2 containing [minDistance, maxDistance] where minDistance is the minimum distance between any two distinct critical points and maxDistance is the maximum distance between any two distinct critical points. If there are fewer than two critical points, return [-1, -1].

Example 1:

Input: head = [3,1]
Output: [-1,-1]
Explanation: There are no critical points in [3,1].

Example 2:

Input: head = [5,3,1,2,5,1,2]
Output: [1,3]
Explanation: There are three critical points:
- [5,3,1,2,5,1,2]: The third node is a local minima because 1 is less than 3 and 2.
- [5,3,1,2,5,1,2]: The fifth node is a local maxima because 5 is greater than 2 and 1.
- [5,3,1,2,5,1,2]: The sixth node is a local minima because 1 is less than 5 and 2.
The minimum distance is between the fifth and the sixth node. minDistance = 6 - 5 = 1.
The maximum distance is between the third and the sixth node. maxDistance = 6 - 3 = 3.

Example 3:

Input: head = [1,3,2,2,3,2,2,2,7]
Output: [3,3]
Explanation: There are two critical points:
- [1,3,2,2,3,2,2,2,7]: The second node is a local maxima because 3 is greater than 1 and 2.
- [1,3,2,2,3,2,2,2,7]: The fifth node is a local maxima because 3 is greater than 2 and 2.
Both the minimum and maximum distances are between the second and the fifth node.
Thus, minDistance and maxDistance is 5 - 2 = 3.
Note that the last node is not considered a local maxima because it does not have a next node.

Constraints:

  • The number of nodes in the list is in the range [2, 105].
  • 1 <= Node.val <= 105
Patterns Used

Roadmap

  1. Brute Force Baseline
  2. Core Insight
  3. Algorithm Walkthrough
  4. Edge Cases
  5. Full Annotated Code
  6. Interactive Study Demo
  7. Complexity Analysis
Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: A critical point in a linked list is defined as either a local maxima or a local minima. A node is a local maxima if the current node has a value strictly greater than the previous node and the next node. A node is a local minima if the current node has a value strictly smaller than the previous node and the next node. Note that a node can only be a local maxima/minima if there exists both a previous node and a next node. Given a linked list head, return an array of length 2 containing [minDistance, maxDistance] where minDistance is the minimum distance between any two distinct critical points and maxDistance is the maximum distance between any two distinct critical points. If there are fewer than two critical points, return [-1, -1].

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Linked List

Example 1

[3,1]

Example 2

[5,3,1,2,5,1,2]

Example 3

[1,3,2,2,3,2,2,2,7]
Step 02

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

  • The maximum distance must be the distance between the first and last critical point.
  • For each adjacent critical point, calculate the difference and check if it is the minimum distance.
Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.
Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

  1. Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
  2. Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
  3. Record answer candidate when condition is met.
  4. Continue until all input is consumed.
Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.
Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input
Single element / shortest valid input
Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.
Duplicates & Repeats
Repeated values / repeated states
Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.
Extreme Constraints
Upper-end input sizes
Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.
Invalid / Corner Shape
Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures
Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.
Step 05

Full Annotated Code

Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2058: Find the Minimum and Maximum Number of Nodes Between Critical Points
/**
 * Definition for singly-linked list.
 * public class ListNode {
 *     int val;
 *     ListNode next;
 *     ListNode() {}
 *     ListNode(int val) { this.val = val; }
 *     ListNode(int val, ListNode next) { this.val = val; this.next = next; }
 * }
 */
class Solution {
    public int[] nodesBetweenCriticalPoints(ListNode head) {
        int[] ans = {1 << 30, 0};
        int first = -1, last = -1;
        for (int i = 0; head.next.next != null; head = head.next, ++i) {
            int a = head.val, b = head.next.val, c = head.next.next.val;
            if (b < Math.min(a, c) || b > Math.max(a, c)) {
                if (last == -1) {
                    first = i;
                    last = i;
                } else {
                    ans[0] = Math.min(ans[0], i - last);
                    last = i;
                    ans[1] = Math.max(ans[1], last - first);
                }
            }
        }
        return first == last ? new int[] {-1, -1} : ans;
    }
}
Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Press Step or Run All to begin.
Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time
O(n)
Space
O(1)

Approach Breakdown

COPY TO ARRAY
O(n) time
O(n) space

Copy all n nodes into an array (O(n) time and space), then use array indexing for random access. Operations like reversal or middle-finding become trivial with indices, but the O(n) extra space defeats the purpose of using a linked list.

IN-PLACE POINTERS
O(n) time
O(1) space

Most linked list operations traverse the list once (O(n)) and re-wire pointers in-place (O(1) extra space). The brute force often copies nodes to an array to enable random access, costing O(n) space. In-place pointer manipulation eliminates that.

Shortcut: Traverse once + re-wire pointers → O(n) time, O(1) space. Dummy head nodes simplify edge cases.
Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

Losing head/tail while rewiring

Wrong move: Pointer updates overwrite references before they are saved.

Usually fails on: List becomes disconnected mid-operation.

Fix: Store next pointers first and use a dummy head for safer joins.