Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
Given an array of positive integers nums and a positive integer target, return the minimal length of a subarray whose sum is greater than or equal to target. If there is no such subarray, return 0 instead.
Example 1:
Input: target = 7, nums = [2,3,1,2,4,3] Output: 2 Explanation: The subarray [4,3] has the minimal length under the problem constraint.
Example 2:
Input: target = 4, nums = [1,4,4] Output: 1
Example 3:
Input: target = 11, nums = [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1] Output: 0
Constraints:
1 <= target <= 1091 <= nums.length <= 1051 <= nums[i] <= 104O(n) solution, try coding another solution of which the time complexity is O(n log(n)).Problem summary: Given an array of positive integers nums and a positive integer target, return the minimal length of a subarray whose sum is greater than or equal to target. If there is no such subarray, return 0 instead.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Binary Search · Sliding Window
7 [2,3,1,2,4,3]
4 [1,4,4]
11 [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]
minimum-window-substring)maximum-size-subarray-sum-equals-k)maximum-length-of-repeated-subarray)minimum-operations-to-reduce-x-to-zero)k-radius-subarray-averages)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #209: Minimum Size Subarray Sum
class Solution {
public int minSubArrayLen(int target, int[] nums) {
int n = nums.length;
long[] s = new long[n + 1];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
s[i + 1] = s[i] + nums[i];
}
int ans = n + 1;
for (int i = 0; i <= n; ++i) {
int j = search(s, s[i] + target);
if (j <= n) {
ans = Math.min(ans, j - i);
}
}
return ans <= n ? ans : 0;
}
private int search(long[] nums, long x) {
int l = 0, r = nums.length;
while (l < r) {
int mid = (l + r) >> 1;
if (nums[mid] >= x) {
r = mid;
} else {
l = mid + 1;
}
}
return l;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #209: Minimum Size Subarray Sum
func minSubArrayLen(target int, nums []int) int {
n := len(nums)
s := make([]int, n+1)
for i, x := range nums {
s[i+1] = s[i] + x
}
ans := n + 1
for i, x := range s {
j := sort.SearchInts(s, x+target)
if j <= n {
ans = min(ans, j-i)
}
}
if ans == n+1 {
return 0
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #209: Minimum Size Subarray Sum
class Solution:
def minSubArrayLen(self, target: int, nums: List[int]) -> int:
n = len(nums)
s = list(accumulate(nums, initial=0))
ans = n + 1
for i, x in enumerate(s):
j = bisect_left(s, x + target)
if j <= n:
ans = min(ans, j - i)
return ans if ans <= n else 0
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #209: Minimum Size Subarray Sum
impl Solution {
pub fn min_sub_array_len(target: i32, nums: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let n = nums.len();
let mut res = n + 1;
let mut sum = 0;
let mut i = 0;
for j in 0..n {
sum += nums[j];
while sum >= target {
res = res.min(j - i + 1);
sum -= nums[i];
i += 1;
}
}
if res == n + 1 {
return 0;
}
res as i32
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #209: Minimum Size Subarray Sum
function minSubArrayLen(target: number, nums: number[]): number {
const n = nums.length;
const s: number[] = new Array(n + 1).fill(0);
for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
s[i + 1] = s[i] + nums[i];
}
let ans = n + 1;
const search = (x: number) => {
let l = 0;
let r = n + 1;
while (l < r) {
const mid = (l + r) >>> 1;
if (s[mid] >= x) {
r = mid;
} else {
l = mid + 1;
}
}
return l;
};
for (let i = 0; i <= n; ++i) {
const j = search(s[i] + target);
if (j <= n) {
ans = Math.min(ans, j - i);
}
}
return ans === n + 1 ? 0 : ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Check every element from left to right until we find the target or exhaust the array. Each comparison is O(1), and we may visit all n elements, giving O(n). No extra space needed.
Each comparison eliminates half the remaining search space. After k comparisons, the space is n/2ᵏ. We stop when the space is 1, so k = log₂ n. No extra memory needed — just two pointers (lo, hi).
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Setting `lo = mid` or `hi = mid` can stall and create an infinite loop.
Usually fails on: Two-element ranges never converge.
Fix: Use `lo = mid + 1` or `hi = mid - 1` where appropriate.
Wrong move: Using `if` instead of `while` leaves the window invalid for multiple iterations.
Usually fails on: Over-limit windows stay invalid and produce wrong lengths/counts.
Fix: Shrink in a `while` loop until the invariant is valid again.