Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums. An index i is part of a hill in nums if the closest non-equal neighbors of i are smaller than nums[i]. Similarly, an index i is part of a valley in nums if the closest non-equal neighbors of i are larger than nums[i]. Adjacent indices i and j are part of the same hill or valley if nums[i] == nums[j].
Note that for an index to be part of a hill or valley, it must have a non-equal neighbor on both the left and right of the index.
Return the number of hills and valleys in nums.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [2,4,1,1,6,5] Output: 3 Explanation: At index 0: There is no non-equal neighbor of 2 on the left, so index 0 is neither a hill nor a valley. At index 1: The closest non-equal neighbors of 4 are 2 and 1. Since 4 > 2 and 4 > 1, index 1 is a hill. At index 2: The closest non-equal neighbors of 1 are 4 and 6. Since 1 < 4 and 1 < 6, index 2 is a valley. At index 3: The closest non-equal neighbors of 1 are 4 and 6. Since 1 < 4 and 1 < 6, index 3 is a valley, but note that it is part of the same valley as index 2. At index 4: The closest non-equal neighbors of 6 are 1 and 5. Since 6 > 1 and 6 > 5, index 4 is a hill. At index 5: There is no non-equal neighbor of 5 on the right, so index 5 is neither a hill nor a valley. There are 3 hills and valleys so we return 3.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [6,6,5,5,4,1] Output: 0 Explanation: At index 0: There is no non-equal neighbor of 6 on the left, so index 0 is neither a hill nor a valley. At index 1: There is no non-equal neighbor of 6 on the left, so index 1 is neither a hill nor a valley. At index 2: The closest non-equal neighbors of 5 are 6 and 4. Since 5 < 6 and 5 > 4, index 2 is neither a hill nor a valley. At index 3: The closest non-equal neighbors of 5 are 6 and 4. Since 5 < 6 and 5 > 4, index 3 is neither a hill nor a valley. At index 4: The closest non-equal neighbors of 4 are 5 and 1. Since 4 < 5 and 4 > 1, index 4 is neither a hill nor a valley. At index 5: There is no non-equal neighbor of 1 on the right, so index 5 is neither a hill nor a valley. There are 0 hills and valleys so we return 0.
Constraints:
3 <= nums.length <= 1001 <= nums[i] <= 100Problem summary: You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums. An index i is part of a hill in nums if the closest non-equal neighbors of i are smaller than nums[i]. Similarly, an index i is part of a valley in nums if the closest non-equal neighbors of i are larger than nums[i]. Adjacent indices i and j are part of the same hill or valley if nums[i] == nums[j]. Note that for an index to be part of a hill or valley, it must have a non-equal neighbor on both the left and right of the index. Return the number of hills and valleys in nums.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[2,4,1,1,6,5]
[6,6,5,5,4,1]
find-peak-element)monotonic-array)minimum-subsequence-in-non-increasing-order)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2210: Count Hills and Valleys in an Array
class Solution {
public int countHillValley(int[] nums) {
int ans = 0, j = 0;
for (int i = 1; i < nums.length - 1; ++i) {
if (nums[i] == nums[i + 1]) {
continue;
}
if (nums[i] > nums[j] && nums[i] > nums[i + 1]) {
++ans;
}
if (nums[i] < nums[j] && nums[i] < nums[i + 1]) {
++ans;
}
j = i;
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2210: Count Hills and Valleys in an Array
func countHillValley(nums []int) int {
ans := 0
for i, j := 1, 0; i < len(nums)-1; i++ {
if nums[i] == nums[i+1] {
continue
}
if nums[i] > nums[j] && nums[i] > nums[i+1] {
ans++
}
if nums[i] < nums[j] && nums[i] < nums[i+1] {
ans++
}
j = i
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2210: Count Hills and Valleys in an Array
class Solution:
def countHillValley(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
ans = j = 0
for i in range(1, len(nums) - 1):
if nums[i] == nums[i + 1]:
continue
if nums[i] > nums[j] and nums[i] > nums[i + 1]:
ans += 1
if nums[i] < nums[j] and nums[i] < nums[i + 1]:
ans += 1
j = i
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2210: Count Hills and Valleys in an Array
impl Solution {
pub fn count_hill_valley(nums: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let mut ans = 0;
let mut j = 0;
for i in 1..nums.len() - 1 {
if nums[i] == nums[i + 1] {
continue;
}
if nums[i] > nums[j] && nums[i] > nums[i + 1] {
ans += 1;
}
if nums[i] < nums[j] && nums[i] < nums[i + 1] {
ans += 1;
}
j = i;
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2210: Count Hills and Valleys in an Array
function countHillValley(nums: number[]): number {
let ans = 0;
for (let i = 1, j = 0; i < nums.length - 1; ++i) {
if (nums[i] === nums[i + 1]) {
continue;
}
if (nums[i] > nums[j] && nums[i] > nums[i + 1]) {
ans++;
}
if (nums[i] < nums[j] && nums[i] < nums[i + 1]) {
ans++;
}
j = i;
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.