Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on core interview patterns fundamentals.
You are given a string s consisting of digits and an integer k.
A round can be completed if the length of s is greater than k. In one round, do the following:
s into consecutive groups of size k such that the first k characters are in the first group, the next k characters are in the second group, and so on. Note that the size of the last group can be smaller than k.s with a string representing the sum of all its digits. For example, "346" is replaced with "13" because 3 + 4 + 6 = 13.k, repeat from step 1.Return s after all rounds have been completed.
Example 1:
Input: s = "11111222223", k = 3 Output: "135" Explanation: - For the first round, we divide s into groups of size 3: "111", "112", "222", and "23". Then we calculate the digit sum of each group: 1 + 1 + 1 = 3, 1 + 1 + 2 = 4, 2 + 2 + 2 = 6, and 2 + 3 = 5. So, s becomes "3" + "4" + "6" + "5" = "3465" after the first round. - For the second round, we divide s into "346" and "5". Then we calculate the digit sum of each group: 3 + 4 + 6 = 13, 5 = 5. So, s becomes "13" + "5" = "135" after second round. Now, s.length <= k, so we return "135" as the answer.
Example 2:
Input: s = "00000000", k = 3 Output: "000" Explanation: We divide s into "000", "000", and "00". Then we calculate the digit sum of each group: 0 + 0 + 0 = 0, 0 + 0 + 0 = 0, and 0 + 0 = 0. s becomes "0" + "0" + "0" = "000", whose length is equal to k, so we return "000".
Constraints:
1 <= s.length <= 1002 <= k <= 100s consists of digits only.Problem summary: You are given a string s consisting of digits and an integer k. A round can be completed if the length of s is greater than k. In one round, do the following: Divide s into consecutive groups of size k such that the first k characters are in the first group, the next k characters are in the second group, and so on. Note that the size of the last group can be smaller than k. Replace each group of s with a string representing the sum of all its digits. For example, "346" is replaced with "13" because 3 + 4 + 6 = 13. Merge consecutive groups together to form a new string. If the length of the string is greater than k, repeat from step 1. Return s after all rounds have been completed.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
"11111222223" 3
"00000000" 3
add-digits)find-triangular-sum-of-an-array)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2243: Calculate Digit Sum of a String
class Solution {
public String digitSum(String s, int k) {
while (s.length() > k) {
int n = s.length();
StringBuilder t = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < n; i += k) {
int x = 0;
for (int j = i; j < Math.min(i + k, n); ++j) {
x += s.charAt(j) - '0';
}
t.append(x);
}
s = t.toString();
}
return s;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2243: Calculate Digit Sum of a String
func digitSum(s string, k int) string {
for len(s) > k {
t := &strings.Builder{}
n := len(s)
for i := 0; i < n; i += k {
x := 0
for j := i; j < i+k && j < n; j++ {
x += int(s[j] - '0')
}
t.WriteString(strconv.Itoa(x))
}
s = t.String()
}
return s
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2243: Calculate Digit Sum of a String
class Solution:
def digitSum(self, s: str, k: int) -> str:
while len(s) > k:
t = []
n = len(s)
for i in range(0, n, k):
x = 0
for j in range(i, min(i + k, n)):
x += int(s[j])
t.append(str(x))
s = "".join(t)
return s
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2243: Calculate Digit Sum of a String
impl Solution {
pub fn digit_sum(s: String, k: i32) -> String {
let mut s = s;
let k = k as usize;
while s.len() > k {
let mut t = Vec::new();
for chunk in s.as_bytes().chunks(k) {
let sum: i32 = chunk.iter().map(|&c| (c - b'0') as i32).sum();
t.push(sum.to_string());
}
s = t.join("");
}
s
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2243: Calculate Digit Sum of a String
function digitSum(s: string, k: number): string {
while (s.length > k) {
const t: number[] = [];
for (let i = 0; i < s.length; i += k) {
const x = s
.slice(i, i + k)
.split('')
.reduce((a, b) => a + +b, 0);
t.push(x);
}
s = t.join('');
}
return s;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.