Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given two integers m and n representing a 0-indexed m x n grid. You are also given two 2D integer arrays guards and walls where guards[i] = [rowi, coli] and walls[j] = [rowj, colj] represent the positions of the ith guard and jth wall respectively.
A guard can see every cell in the four cardinal directions (north, east, south, or west) starting from their position unless obstructed by a wall or another guard. A cell is guarded if there is at least one guard that can see it.
Return the number of unoccupied cells that are not guarded.
Example 1:
Input: m = 4, n = 6, guards = [[0,0],[1,1],[2,3]], walls = [[0,1],[2,2],[1,4]] Output: 7 Explanation: The guarded and unguarded cells are shown in red and green respectively in the above diagram. There are a total of 7 unguarded cells, so we return 7.
Example 2:
Input: m = 3, n = 3, guards = [[1,1]], walls = [[0,1],[1,0],[2,1],[1,2]] Output: 4 Explanation: The unguarded cells are shown in green in the above diagram. There are a total of 4 unguarded cells, so we return 4.
Constraints:
1 <= m, n <= 1052 <= m * n <= 1051 <= guards.length, walls.length <= 5 * 1042 <= guards.length + walls.length <= m * nguards[i].length == walls[j].length == 20 <= rowi, rowj < m0 <= coli, colj < nguards and walls are unique.Problem summary: You are given two integers m and n representing a 0-indexed m x n grid. You are also given two 2D integer arrays guards and walls where guards[i] = [rowi, coli] and walls[j] = [rowj, colj] represent the positions of the ith guard and jth wall respectively. A guard can see every cell in the four cardinal directions (north, east, south, or west) starting from their position unless obstructed by a wall or another guard. A cell is guarded if there is at least one guard that can see it. Return the number of unoccupied cells that are not guarded.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
4 6 [[0,0],[1,1],[2,3]] [[0,1],[2,2],[1,4]]
3 3 [[1,1]] [[0,1],[1,0],[2,1],[1,2]]
bomb-enemy)available-captures-for-rook)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2257: Count Unguarded Cells in the Grid
class Solution {
public int countUnguarded(int m, int n, int[][] guards, int[][] walls) {
int[][] g = new int[m][n];
for (var e : guards) {
g[e[0]][e[1]] = 2;
}
for (var e : walls) {
g[e[0]][e[1]] = 2;
}
int[] dirs = {-1, 0, 1, 0, -1};
for (var e : guards) {
for (int k = 0; k < 4; ++k) {
int x = e[0], y = e[1];
int a = dirs[k], b = dirs[k + 1];
while (x + a >= 0 && x + a < m && y + b >= 0 && y + b < n && g[x + a][y + b] < 2) {
x += a;
y += b;
g[x][y] = 1;
}
}
}
int ans = 0;
for (var row : g) {
for (int v : row) {
if (v == 0) {
++ans;
}
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2257: Count Unguarded Cells in the Grid
func countUnguarded(m int, n int, guards [][]int, walls [][]int) (ans int) {
g := make([][]int, m)
for i := range g {
g[i] = make([]int, n)
}
for _, e := range guards {
g[e[0]][e[1]] = 2
}
for _, e := range walls {
g[e[0]][e[1]] = 2
}
dirs := [5]int{-1, 0, 1, 0, -1}
for _, e := range guards {
for k := 0; k < 4; k++ {
x, y := e[0], e[1]
a, b := dirs[k], dirs[k+1]
for x+a >= 0 && x+a < m && y+b >= 0 && y+b < n && g[x+a][y+b] < 2 {
x, y = x+a, y+b
g[x][y] = 1
}
}
}
for _, row := range g {
for _, v := range row {
if v == 0 {
ans++
}
}
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2257: Count Unguarded Cells in the Grid
class Solution:
def countUnguarded(
self, m: int, n: int, guards: List[List[int]], walls: List[List[int]]
) -> int:
g = [[0] * n for _ in range(m)]
for i, j in guards:
g[i][j] = 2
for i, j in walls:
g[i][j] = 2
dirs = (-1, 0, 1, 0, -1)
for i, j in guards:
for a, b in pairwise(dirs):
x, y = i, j
while 0 <= x + a < m and 0 <= y + b < n and g[x + a][y + b] < 2:
x, y = x + a, y + b
g[x][y] = 1
return sum(v == 0 for row in g for v in row)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2257: Count Unguarded Cells in the Grid
impl Solution {
pub fn count_unguarded(m: i32, n: i32, guards: Vec<Vec<i32>>, walls: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> i32 {
let m = m as usize;
let n = n as usize;
let mut g = vec![vec![0; n]; m];
for e in &guards {
g[e[0] as usize][e[1] as usize] = 2;
}
for e in &walls {
g[e[0] as usize][e[1] as usize] = 2;
}
let dirs = [-1, 0, 1, 0, -1];
for e in &guards {
let (x0, y0) = (e[0] as i32, e[1] as i32);
for k in 0..4 {
let (mut x, mut y) = (x0, y0);
let (a, b) = (dirs[k], dirs[k + 1]);
while x + a >= 0
&& x + a < m as i32
&& y + b >= 0
&& y + b < n as i32
&& g[(x + a) as usize][(y + b) as usize] < 2
{
x += a;
y += b;
g[x as usize][y as usize] = 1;
}
}
}
let mut ans = 0;
for row in g {
for v in row {
if v == 0 {
ans += 1;
}
}
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2257: Count Unguarded Cells in the Grid
function countUnguarded(m: number, n: number, guards: number[][], walls: number[][]): number {
const g: number[][] = Array.from({ length: m }, () => Array.from({ length: n }, () => 0));
for (const [i, j] of guards) {
g[i][j] = 2;
}
for (const [i, j] of walls) {
g[i][j] = 2;
}
const dirs: number[] = [-1, 0, 1, 0, -1];
for (const [i, j] of guards) {
for (let k = 0; k < 4; ++k) {
let [x, y] = [i, j];
let [a, b] = [dirs[k], dirs[k + 1]];
while (x + a >= 0 && x + a < m && y + b >= 0 && y + b < n && g[x + a][y + b] < 2) {
x += a;
y += b;
g[x][y] = 1;
}
}
}
let ans = 0;
for (const row of g) {
for (const v of row) {
ans += v === 0 ? 1 : 0;
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.