Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given a 0-indexed string array words, where words[i] consists of lowercase English letters.
In one operation, select any index i such that 0 < i < words.length and words[i - 1] and words[i] are anagrams, and delete words[i] from words. Keep performing this operation as long as you can select an index that satisfies the conditions.
Return words after performing all operations. It can be shown that selecting the indices for each operation in any arbitrary order will lead to the same result.
An Anagram is a word or phrase formed by rearranging the letters of a different word or phrase using all the original letters exactly once. For example, "dacb" is an anagram of "abdc".
Example 1:
Input: words = ["abba","baba","bbaa","cd","cd"] Output: ["abba","cd"] Explanation: One of the ways we can obtain the resultant array is by using the following operations: - Since words[2] = "bbaa" and words[1] = "baba" are anagrams, we choose index 2 and delete words[2]. Now words = ["abba","baba","cd","cd"]. - Since words[1] = "baba" and words[0] = "abba" are anagrams, we choose index 1 and delete words[1]. Now words = ["abba","cd","cd"]. - Since words[2] = "cd" and words[1] = "cd" are anagrams, we choose index 2 and delete words[2]. Now words = ["abba","cd"]. We can no longer perform any operations, so ["abba","cd"] is the final answer.
Example 2:
Input: words = ["a","b","c","d","e"] Output: ["a","b","c","d","e"] Explanation: No two adjacent strings in words are anagrams of each other, so no operations are performed.
Constraints:
1 <= words.length <= 1001 <= words[i].length <= 10words[i] consists of lowercase English letters.Problem summary: You are given a 0-indexed string array words, where words[i] consists of lowercase English letters. In one operation, select any index i such that 0 < i < words.length and words[i - 1] and words[i] are anagrams, and delete words[i] from words. Keep performing this operation as long as you can select an index that satisfies the conditions. Return words after performing all operations. It can be shown that selecting the indices for each operation in any arbitrary order will lead to the same result. An Anagram is a word or phrase formed by rearranging the letters of a different word or phrase using all the original letters exactly once. For example, "dacb" is an anagram of "abdc".
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map
["abba","baba","bbaa","cd","cd"]
["a","b","c","d","e"]
group-anagrams)valid-anagram)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2273: Find Resultant Array After Removing Anagrams
class Solution {
public List<String> removeAnagrams(String[] words) {
List<String> ans = new ArrayList<>();
ans.add(words[0]);
for (int i = 1; i < words.length; ++i) {
if (check(words[i - 1], words[i])) {
ans.add(words[i]);
}
}
return ans;
}
private boolean check(String s, String t) {
if (s.length() != t.length()) {
return true;
}
int[] cnt = new int[26];
for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); ++i) {
++cnt[s.charAt(i) - 'a'];
}
for (int i = 0; i < t.length(); ++i) {
if (--cnt[t.charAt(i) - 'a'] < 0) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2273: Find Resultant Array After Removing Anagrams
func removeAnagrams(words []string) []string {
ans := []string{words[0]}
check := func(s, t string) bool {
if len(s) != len(t) {
return true
}
cnt := [26]int{}
for _, c := range s {
cnt[c-'a']++
}
for _, c := range t {
cnt[c-'a']--
if cnt[c-'a'] < 0 {
return true
}
}
return false
}
for i, t := range words[1:] {
if check(words[i], t) {
ans = append(ans, t)
}
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2273: Find Resultant Array After Removing Anagrams
class Solution:
def removeAnagrams(self, words: List[str]) -> List[str]:
def check(s: str, t: str) -> bool:
if len(s) != len(t):
return True
cnt = Counter(s)
for c in t:
cnt[c] -= 1
if cnt[c] < 0:
return True
return False
return [words[0]] + [t for s, t in pairwise(words) if check(s, t)]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2273: Find Resultant Array After Removing Anagrams
impl Solution {
pub fn remove_anagrams(words: Vec<String>) -> Vec<String> {
fn check(s: &str, t: &str) -> bool {
if s.len() != t.len() {
return true;
}
let mut cnt = [0; 26];
for c in s.bytes() {
cnt[(c - b'a') as usize] += 1;
}
for c in t.bytes() {
let idx = (c - b'a') as usize;
cnt[idx] -= 1;
if cnt[idx] < 0 {
return true;
}
}
false
}
let mut ans = vec![words[0].clone()];
for i in 1..words.len() {
if check(&words[i - 1], &words[i]) {
ans.push(words[i].clone());
}
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2273: Find Resultant Array After Removing Anagrams
function removeAnagrams(words: string[]): string[] {
const ans: string[] = [words[0]];
const check = (s: string, t: string): boolean => {
if (s.length !== t.length) {
return true;
}
const cnt: number[] = Array(26).fill(0);
for (const c of s) {
++cnt[c.charCodeAt(0) - 97];
}
for (const c of t) {
if (--cnt[c.charCodeAt(0) - 97] < 0) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
};
for (let i = 1; i < words.length; ++i) {
if (check(words[i - 1], words[i])) {
ans.push(words[i]);
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.