Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given a sorted unique integer array nums.
A range [a,b] is the set of all integers from a to b (inclusive).
Return the smallest sorted list of ranges that cover all the numbers in the array exactly. That is, each element of nums is covered by exactly one of the ranges, and there is no integer x such that x is in one of the ranges but not in nums.
Each range [a,b] in the list should be output as:
"a->b" if a != b"a" if a == bExample 1:
Input: nums = [0,1,2,4,5,7] Output: ["0->2","4->5","7"] Explanation: The ranges are: [0,2] --> "0->2" [4,5] --> "4->5" [7,7] --> "7"
Example 2:
Input: nums = [0,2,3,4,6,8,9] Output: ["0","2->4","6","8->9"] Explanation: The ranges are: [0,0] --> "0" [2,4] --> "2->4" [6,6] --> "6" [8,9] --> "8->9"
Constraints:
0 <= nums.length <= 20-231 <= nums[i] <= 231 - 1nums are unique.nums is sorted in ascending order.Problem summary: You are given a sorted unique integer array nums. A range [a,b] is the set of all integers from a to b (inclusive). Return the smallest sorted list of ranges that cover all the numbers in the array exactly. That is, each element of nums is covered by exactly one of the ranges, and there is no integer x such that x is in one of the ranges but not in nums. Each range [a,b] in the list should be output as: "a->b" if a != b "a" if a == b
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[0,1,2,4,5,7]
[0,2,3,4,6,8,9]
missing-ranges)data-stream-as-disjoint-intervals)find-maximal-uncovered-ranges)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #228: Summary Ranges
class Solution {
public List<String> summaryRanges(int[] nums) {
List<String> ans = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0, j, n = nums.length; i < n; i = j + 1) {
j = i;
while (j + 1 < n && nums[j + 1] == nums[j] + 1) {
++j;
}
ans.add(f(nums, i, j));
}
return ans;
}
private String f(int[] nums, int i, int j) {
return i == j ? nums[i] + "" : String.format("%d->%d", nums[i], nums[j]);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #228: Summary Ranges
func summaryRanges(nums []int) (ans []string) {
f := func(i, j int) string {
if i == j {
return strconv.Itoa(nums[i])
}
return strconv.Itoa(nums[i]) + "->" + strconv.Itoa(nums[j])
}
for i, j, n := 0, 0, len(nums); i < n; i = j + 1 {
j = i
for j+1 < n && nums[j+1] == nums[j]+1 {
j++
}
ans = append(ans, f(i, j))
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #228: Summary Ranges
class Solution:
def summaryRanges(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[str]:
def f(i: int, j: int) -> str:
return str(nums[i]) if i == j else f'{nums[i]}->{nums[j]}'
i = 0
n = len(nums)
ans = []
while i < n:
j = i
while j + 1 < n and nums[j + 1] == nums[j] + 1:
j += 1
ans.append(f(i, j))
i = j + 1
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #228: Summary Ranges
impl Solution {
#[allow(dead_code)]
pub fn summary_ranges(nums: Vec<i32>) -> Vec<String> {
if nums.is_empty() {
return vec![];
}
let mut ret = Vec::new();
let mut start = nums[0];
let mut prev = nums[0];
let mut current = 0;
let n = nums.len();
for i in 1..n {
current = nums[i];
if current != prev + 1 {
if start == prev {
ret.push(start.to_string());
} else {
ret.push(start.to_string() + "->" + &prev.to_string());
}
start = current;
prev = current;
} else {
prev = current;
}
}
if start == prev {
ret.push(start.to_string());
} else {
ret.push(start.to_string() + "->" + &prev.to_string());
}
ret
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #228: Summary Ranges
function summaryRanges(nums: number[]): string[] {
const f = (i: number, j: number): string => {
return i === j ? `${nums[i]}` : `${nums[i]}->${nums[j]}`;
};
const n = nums.length;
const ans: string[] = [];
for (let i = 0, j = 0; i < n; i = j + 1) {
j = i;
while (j + 1 < n && nums[j + 1] === nums[j] + 1) {
++j;
}
ans.push(f(i, j));
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.