Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
There is an undirected tree with n nodes labeled from 0 to n - 1.
You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums of length n where nums[i] represents the value of the ith node. You are also given a 2D integer array edges of length n - 1 where edges[i] = [ai, bi] indicates that there is an edge between nodes ai and bi in the tree.
You are allowed to delete some edges, splitting the tree into multiple connected components. Let the value of a component be the sum of all nums[i] for which node i is in the component.
Return the maximum number of edges you can delete, such that every connected component in the tree has the same value.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [6,2,2,2,6], edges = [[0,1],[1,2],[1,3],[3,4]] Output: 2 Explanation: The above figure shows how we can delete the edges [0,1] and [3,4]. The created components are nodes [0], [1,2,3] and [4]. The sum of the values in each component equals 6. It can be proven that no better deletion exists, so the answer is 2.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [2], edges = [] Output: 0 Explanation: There are no edges to be deleted.
Constraints:
1 <= n <= 2 * 104nums.length == n1 <= nums[i] <= 50edges.length == n - 1edges[i].length == 20 <= edges[i][0], edges[i][1] <= n - 1edges represents a valid tree.Problem summary: There is an undirected tree with n nodes labeled from 0 to n - 1. You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums of length n where nums[i] represents the value of the ith node. You are also given a 2D integer array edges of length n - 1 where edges[i] = [ai, bi] indicates that there is an edge between nodes ai and bi in the tree. You are allowed to delete some edges, splitting the tree into multiple connected components. Let the value of a component be the sum of all nums[i] for which node i is in the component. Return the maximum number of edges you can delete, such that every connected component in the tree has the same value.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Math · Tree
[6,2,2,2,6] [[0,1],[1,2],[1,3],[3,4]]
[2] []
equal-tree-partition)maximum-number-of-k-divisible-components)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2440: Create Components With Same Value
class Solution {
private List<Integer>[] g;
private int[] nums;
private int t;
public int componentValue(int[] nums, int[][] edges) {
int n = nums.length;
g = new List[n];
this.nums = nums;
Arrays.setAll(g, k -> new ArrayList<>());
for (var e : edges) {
int a = e[0], b = e[1];
g[a].add(b);
g[b].add(a);
}
int s = sum(nums), mx = max(nums);
for (int k = Math.min(n, s / mx); k > 1; --k) {
if (s % k == 0) {
t = s / k;
if (dfs(0, -1) == 0) {
return k - 1;
}
}
}
return 0;
}
private int dfs(int i, int fa) {
int x = nums[i];
for (int j : g[i]) {
if (j != fa) {
int y = dfs(j, i);
if (y == -1) {
return -1;
}
x += y;
}
}
if (x > t) {
return -1;
}
return x < t ? x : 0;
}
private int sum(int[] arr) {
int x = 0;
for (int v : arr) {
x += v;
}
return x;
}
private int max(int[] arr) {
int x = arr[0];
for (int v : arr) {
x = Math.max(x, v);
}
return x;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2440: Create Components With Same Value
func componentValue(nums []int, edges [][]int) int {
s, mx := 0, slices.Max(nums)
for _, x := range nums {
s += x
}
n := len(nums)
g := make([][]int, n)
for _, e := range edges {
a, b := e[0], e[1]
g[a] = append(g[a], b)
g[b] = append(g[b], a)
}
t := 0
var dfs func(int, int) int
dfs = func(i, fa int) int {
x := nums[i]
for _, j := range g[i] {
if j != fa {
y := dfs(j, i)
if y == -1 {
return -1
}
x += y
}
}
if x > t {
return -1
}
if x < t {
return x
}
return 0
}
for k := min(n, s/mx); k > 1; k-- {
if s%k == 0 {
t = s / k
if dfs(0, -1) == 0 {
return k - 1
}
}
}
return 0
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2440: Create Components With Same Value
class Solution:
def componentValue(self, nums: List[int], edges: List[List[int]]) -> int:
def dfs(i, fa):
x = nums[i]
for j in g[i]:
if j != fa:
y = dfs(j, i)
if y == -1:
return -1
x += y
if x > t:
return -1
return x if x < t else 0
n = len(nums)
g = defaultdict(list)
for a, b in edges:
g[a].append(b)
g[b].append(a)
s = sum(nums)
mx = max(nums)
for k in range(min(n, s // mx), 1, -1):
if s % k == 0:
t = s // k
if dfs(0, -1) == 0:
return k - 1
return 0
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2440: Create Components With Same Value
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2440: Create Components With Same Value
// class Solution {
// private List<Integer>[] g;
// private int[] nums;
// private int t;
//
// public int componentValue(int[] nums, int[][] edges) {
// int n = nums.length;
// g = new List[n];
// this.nums = nums;
// Arrays.setAll(g, k -> new ArrayList<>());
// for (var e : edges) {
// int a = e[0], b = e[1];
// g[a].add(b);
// g[b].add(a);
// }
// int s = sum(nums), mx = max(nums);
// for (int k = Math.min(n, s / mx); k > 1; --k) {
// if (s % k == 0) {
// t = s / k;
// if (dfs(0, -1) == 0) {
// return k - 1;
// }
// }
// }
// return 0;
// }
//
// private int dfs(int i, int fa) {
// int x = nums[i];
// for (int j : g[i]) {
// if (j != fa) {
// int y = dfs(j, i);
// if (y == -1) {
// return -1;
// }
// x += y;
// }
// }
// if (x > t) {
// return -1;
// }
// return x < t ? x : 0;
// }
//
// private int sum(int[] arr) {
// int x = 0;
// for (int v : arr) {
// x += v;
// }
// return x;
// }
//
// private int max(int[] arr) {
// int x = arr[0];
// for (int v : arr) {
// x = Math.max(x, v);
// }
// return x;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2440: Create Components With Same Value
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from java.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2440: Create Components With Same Value
// class Solution {
// private List<Integer>[] g;
// private int[] nums;
// private int t;
//
// public int componentValue(int[] nums, int[][] edges) {
// int n = nums.length;
// g = new List[n];
// this.nums = nums;
// Arrays.setAll(g, k -> new ArrayList<>());
// for (var e : edges) {
// int a = e[0], b = e[1];
// g[a].add(b);
// g[b].add(a);
// }
// int s = sum(nums), mx = max(nums);
// for (int k = Math.min(n, s / mx); k > 1; --k) {
// if (s % k == 0) {
// t = s / k;
// if (dfs(0, -1) == 0) {
// return k - 1;
// }
// }
// }
// return 0;
// }
//
// private int dfs(int i, int fa) {
// int x = nums[i];
// for (int j : g[i]) {
// if (j != fa) {
// int y = dfs(j, i);
// if (y == -1) {
// return -1;
// }
// x += y;
// }
// }
// if (x > t) {
// return -1;
// }
// return x < t ? x : 0;
// }
//
// private int sum(int[] arr) {
// int x = 0;
// for (int v : arr) {
// x += v;
// }
// return x;
// }
//
// private int max(int[] arr) {
// int x = arr[0];
// for (int v : arr) {
// x = Math.max(x, v);
// }
// return x;
// }
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
BFS with a queue visits every node exactly once — O(n) time. The queue may hold an entire level of the tree, which for a complete binary tree is up to n/2 nodes = O(n) space. This is optimal in time but costly in space for wide trees.
Every node is visited exactly once, giving O(n) time. Space depends on tree shape: O(h) for recursive DFS (stack depth = height h), or O(w) for BFS (queue width = widest level). For balanced trees h = log n; for skewed trees h = n.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Wrong move: Recursive traversal assumes children always exist.
Usually fails on: Leaf nodes throw errors or create wrong depth/path values.
Fix: Handle null/base cases before recursive transitions.