LeetCode #2446 — EASY

Determine if Two Events Have Conflict

Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.

The Problem

Problem Statement

You are given two arrays of strings that represent two inclusive events that happened on the same day, event1 and event2, where:

event1 = [startTime₁, endTime₁] and
event2 = [startTime₂, endTime₂].

Event times are valid 24 hours format in the form of HH:MM.

A conflict happens when two events have some non-empty intersection (i.e., some moment is common to both events).

Return true if there is a conflict between two events. Otherwise, return false.

Example 1:

Input: event1 = ["01:15","02:00"], event2 = ["02:00","03:00"]
Output: true
Explanation: The two events intersect at time 2:00.

Example 2:

Input: event1 = ["01:00","02:00"], event2 = ["01:20","03:00"]
Output: true
Explanation: The two events intersect starting from 01:20 to 02:00.

Example 3:

Input: event1 = ["10:00","11:00"], event2 = ["14:00","15:00"]
Output: false
Explanation: The two events do not intersect.

Constraints:

event1.length == event2.length == 2
event1[i].length == event2[i].length == 5
startTime₁ <= endTime₁
startTime₂ <= endTime₂
All the event times follow the HH:MM format.

Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: You are given two arrays of strings that represent two inclusive events that happened on the same day, event1 and event2, where: event1 = [startTime1, endTime1] and event2 = [startTime2, endTime2]. Event times are valid 24 hours format in the form of HH:MM. A conflict happens when two events have some non-empty intersection (i.e., some moment is common to both events). Return true if there is a conflict between two events. Otherwise, return false.

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Array

Example 1

["01:15","02:00"]
["02:00","03:00"]

Example 2

["01:00","02:00"]
["01:20","03:00"]

Example 3

["10:00","11:00"]
["14:00","15:00"]

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

Parse time format to some integer interval first
How would you determine if two intervals overlap?

Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.

Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
Record answer candidate when condition is met.
Continue until all input is consumed.

Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.

Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input

Single element / shortest valid input

Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.

Duplicates & Repeats

Repeated values / repeated states

Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.

Extreme Constraints

Upper-end input sizes

Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.

Invalid / Corner Shape

Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures

Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.

Step 05

Full Annotated Code

Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2446: Determine if Two Events Have Conflict
class Solution {
    public boolean haveConflict(String[] event1, String[] event2) {
        return !(event1[0].compareTo(event2[1]) > 0 || event1[1].compareTo(event2[0]) < 0);
    }
}

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2446: Determine if Two Events Have Conflict
func haveConflict(event1 []string, event2 []string) bool {
	return !(event1[0] > event2[1] || event1[1] < event2[0])
}

# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2446: Determine if Two Events Have Conflict
class Solution:
    def haveConflict(self, event1: List[str], event2: List[str]) -> bool:
        return not (event1[0] > event2[1] or event1[1] < event2[0])

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2446: Determine if Two Events Have Conflict
impl Solution {
    pub fn have_conflict(event1: Vec<String>, event2: Vec<String>) -> bool {
        !(event1[1] < event2[0] || event1[0] > event2[1])
    }
}

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2446: Determine if Two Events Have Conflict
function haveConflict(event1: string[], event2: string[]): boolean {
    return !(event1[0] > event2[1] || event1[1] < event2[0]);
}

Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Custom checkpoints (one per line)

Press Step or Run All to begin.

Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time

O(1)

Space

O(1)

Approach Breakdown

BRUTE FORCE

O(n²) time

O(1) space

Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.

OPTIMIZED

O(n) time

O(1) space

Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.

Shortcut: If you are using nested loops on an array, there is almost always an O(n) solution. Look for the right auxiliary state.

Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

Off-by-one on range boundaries

Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.

Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.

Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.