Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
Given an integer array nums and an integer k, return the number of subarrays of nums where the greatest common divisor of the subarray's elements is k.
A subarray is a contiguous non-empty sequence of elements within an array.
The greatest common divisor of an array is the largest integer that evenly divides all the array elements.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [9,3,1,2,6,3], k = 3 Output: 4 Explanation: The subarrays of nums where 3 is the greatest common divisor of all the subarray's elements are: - [9,3,1,2,6,3] - [9,3,1,2,6,3] - [9,3,1,2,6,3] - [9,3,1,2,6,3]
Example 2:
Input: nums = [4], k = 7 Output: 0 Explanation: There are no subarrays of nums where 7 is the greatest common divisor of all the subarray's elements.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 10001 <= nums[i], k <= 109Problem summary: Given an integer array nums and an integer k, return the number of subarrays of nums where the greatest common divisor of the subarray's elements is k. A subarray is a contiguous non-empty sequence of elements within an array. The greatest common divisor of an array is the largest integer that evenly divides all the array elements.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Math
[9,3,1,2,6,3] 3
[4] 7
find-greatest-common-divisor-of-array)number-of-subarrays-with-lcm-equal-to-k)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2447: Number of Subarrays With GCD Equal to K
class Solution {
public int subarrayGCD(int[] nums, int k) {
int n = nums.length;
int ans = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
int g = 0;
for (int j = i; j < n; ++j) {
g = gcd(g, nums[j]);
if (g == k) {
++ans;
}
}
}
return ans;
}
private int gcd(int a, int b) {
return b == 0 ? a : gcd(b, a % b);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2447: Number of Subarrays With GCD Equal to K
func subarrayGCD(nums []int, k int) (ans int) {
for i := range nums {
g := 0
for _, x := range nums[i:] {
g = gcd(g, x)
if g == k {
ans++
}
}
}
return
}
func gcd(a, b int) int {
if b == 0 {
return a
}
return gcd(b, a%b)
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2447: Number of Subarrays With GCD Equal to K
class Solution:
def subarrayGCD(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int:
ans = 0
for i in range(len(nums)):
g = 0
for x in nums[i:]:
g = gcd(g, x)
ans += g == k
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2447: Number of Subarrays With GCD Equal to K
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2447: Number of Subarrays With GCD Equal to K
// class Solution {
// public int subarrayGCD(int[] nums, int k) {
// int n = nums.length;
// int ans = 0;
// for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
// int g = 0;
// for (int j = i; j < n; ++j) {
// g = gcd(g, nums[j]);
// if (g == k) {
// ++ans;
// }
// }
// }
// return ans;
// }
//
// private int gcd(int a, int b) {
// return b == 0 ? a : gcd(b, a % b);
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2447: Number of Subarrays With GCD Equal to K
function subarrayGCD(nums: number[], k: number): number {
let ans = 0;
const n = nums.length;
for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
let g = 0;
for (let j = i; j < n; ++j) {
g = gcd(g, nums[j]);
if (g === k) {
++ans;
}
}
}
return ans;
}
function gcd(a: number, b: number): number {
return b === 0 ? a : gcd(b, a % b);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.