Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
You are given two positive integer arrays nums and target, of the same length.
In one operation, you can choose any two distinct indices i and j where 0 <= i, j < nums.length and:
nums[i] = nums[i] + 2 andnums[j] = nums[j] - 2.Two arrays are considered to be similar if the frequency of each element is the same.
Return the minimum number of operations required to make nums similar to target. The test cases are generated such that nums can always be similar to target.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [8,12,6], target = [2,14,10] Output: 2 Explanation: It is possible to make nums similar to target in two operations: - Choose i = 0 and j = 2, nums = [10,12,4]. - Choose i = 1 and j = 2, nums = [10,14,2]. It can be shown that 2 is the minimum number of operations needed.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [1,2,5], target = [4,1,3] Output: 1 Explanation: We can make nums similar to target in one operation: - Choose i = 1 and j = 2, nums = [1,4,3].
Example 3:
Input: nums = [1,1,1,1,1], target = [1,1,1,1,1] Output: 0 Explanation: The array nums is already similiar to target.
Constraints:
n == nums.length == target.length1 <= n <= 1051 <= nums[i], target[i] <= 106nums similar to target.Problem summary: You are given two positive integer arrays nums and target, of the same length. In one operation, you can choose any two distinct indices i and j where 0 <= i, j < nums.length and: set nums[i] = nums[i] + 2 and set nums[j] = nums[j] - 2. Two arrays are considered to be similar if the frequency of each element is the same. Return the minimum number of operations required to make nums similar to target. The test cases are generated such that nums can always be similar to target.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Greedy
[8,12,6] [2,14,10]
[1,2,5] [4,1,3]
[1,1,1,1,1] [1,1,1,1,1]
minimum-operations-to-make-array-equal)minimum-operations-to-make-array-equal-ii)rearranging-fruits)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2449: Minimum Number of Operations to Make Arrays Similar
class Solution {
public long makeSimilar(int[] nums, int[] target) {
Arrays.sort(nums);
Arrays.sort(target);
List<Integer> a1 = new ArrayList<>();
List<Integer> a2 = new ArrayList<>();
List<Integer> b1 = new ArrayList<>();
List<Integer> b2 = new ArrayList<>();
for (int v : nums) {
if (v % 2 == 0) {
a1.add(v);
} else {
a2.add(v);
}
}
for (int v : target) {
if (v % 2 == 0) {
b1.add(v);
} else {
b2.add(v);
}
}
long ans = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < a1.size(); ++i) {
ans += Math.abs(a1.get(i) - b1.get(i));
}
for (int i = 0; i < a2.size(); ++i) {
ans += Math.abs(a2.get(i) - b2.get(i));
}
return ans / 4;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2449: Minimum Number of Operations to Make Arrays Similar
func makeSimilar(nums []int, target []int) int64 {
sort.Ints(nums)
sort.Ints(target)
a1, a2, b1, b2 := []int{}, []int{}, []int{}, []int{}
for _, v := range nums {
if v%2 == 0 {
a1 = append(a1, v)
} else {
a2 = append(a2, v)
}
}
for _, v := range target {
if v%2 == 0 {
b1 = append(b1, v)
} else {
b2 = append(b2, v)
}
}
ans := 0
for i := 0; i < len(a1); i++ {
ans += abs(a1[i] - b1[i])
}
for i := 0; i < len(a2); i++ {
ans += abs(a2[i] - b2[i])
}
return int64(ans / 4)
}
func abs(x int) int {
if x < 0 {
return -x
}
return x
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2449: Minimum Number of Operations to Make Arrays Similar
class Solution:
def makeSimilar(self, nums: List[int], target: List[int]) -> int:
nums.sort(key=lambda x: (x & 1, x))
target.sort(key=lambda x: (x & 1, x))
return sum(abs(a - b) for a, b in zip(nums, target)) // 4
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2449: Minimum Number of Operations to Make Arrays Similar
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2449: Minimum Number of Operations to Make Arrays Similar
// class Solution {
// public long makeSimilar(int[] nums, int[] target) {
// Arrays.sort(nums);
// Arrays.sort(target);
// List<Integer> a1 = new ArrayList<>();
// List<Integer> a2 = new ArrayList<>();
// List<Integer> b1 = new ArrayList<>();
// List<Integer> b2 = new ArrayList<>();
// for (int v : nums) {
// if (v % 2 == 0) {
// a1.add(v);
// } else {
// a2.add(v);
// }
// }
// for (int v : target) {
// if (v % 2 == 0) {
// b1.add(v);
// } else {
// b2.add(v);
// }
// }
// long ans = 0;
// for (int i = 0; i < a1.size(); ++i) {
// ans += Math.abs(a1.get(i) - b1.get(i));
// }
// for (int i = 0; i < a2.size(); ++i) {
// ans += Math.abs(a2.get(i) - b2.get(i));
// }
// return ans / 4;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2449: Minimum Number of Operations to Make Arrays Similar
function makeSimilar(nums: number[], target: number[]): number {
nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);
target.sort((a, b) => a - b);
const a1: number[] = [];
const a2: number[] = [];
const b1: number[] = [];
const b2: number[] = [];
for (const v of nums) {
if (v % 2 === 0) {
a1.push(v);
} else {
a2.push(v);
}
}
for (const v of target) {
if (v % 2 === 0) {
b1.push(v);
} else {
b2.push(v);
}
}
let ans = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < a1.length; ++i) {
ans += Math.abs(a1[i] - b1[i]);
}
for (let i = 0; i < a2.length; ++i) {
ans += Math.abs(a2[i] - b2[i]);
}
return ans / 4;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Try every possible combination of choices. With n items each having two states (include/exclude), the search space is 2ⁿ. Evaluating each combination takes O(n), giving O(n × 2ⁿ). The recursion stack or subset storage uses O(n) space.
Greedy algorithms typically sort the input (O(n log n)) then make a single pass (O(n)). The sort dominates. If the input is already sorted or the greedy choice can be computed without sorting, time drops to O(n). Proving greedy correctness (exchange argument) is harder than the implementation.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Locally optimal choices may fail globally.
Usually fails on: Counterexamples appear on crafted input orderings.
Fix: Verify with exchange argument or monotonic objective before committing.