Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given a 0-indexed m x n binary matrix grid.
A 0-indexed m x n difference matrix diff is created with the following procedure:
ith row be onesRowi.jth column be onesColj.ith row be zerosRowi.jth column be zerosColj.diff[i][j] = onesRowi + onesColj - zerosRowi - zerosColjReturn the difference matrix diff.
Example 1:
Input: grid = [[0,1,1],[1,0,1],[0,0,1]] Output: [[0,0,4],[0,0,4],[-2,-2,2]] Explanation: - diff[0][0] =onesRow0 + onesCol0 - zerosRow0 - zerosCol0= 2 + 1 - 1 - 2 = 0 - diff[0][1] =onesRow0 + onesCol1 - zerosRow0 - zerosCol1= 2 + 1 - 1 - 2 = 0 - diff[0][2] =onesRow0 + onesCol2 - zerosRow0 - zerosCol2= 2 + 3 - 1 - 0 = 4 - diff[1][0] =onesRow1 + onesCol0 - zerosRow1 - zerosCol0= 2 + 1 - 1 - 2 = 0 - diff[1][1] =onesRow1 + onesCol1 - zerosRow1 - zerosCol1= 2 + 1 - 1 - 2 = 0 - diff[1][2] =onesRow1 + onesCol2 - zerosRow1 - zerosCol2= 2 + 3 - 1 - 0 = 4 - diff[2][0] =onesRow2 + onesCol0 - zerosRow2 - zerosCol0= 1 + 1 - 2 - 2 = -2 - diff[2][1] =onesRow2 + onesCol1 - zerosRow2 - zerosCol1= 1 + 1 - 2 - 2 = -2 - diff[2][2] =onesRow2 + onesCol2 - zerosRow2 - zerosCol2= 1 + 3 - 2 - 0 = 2
Example 2:
Input: grid = [[1,1,1],[1,1,1]] Output: [[5,5,5],[5,5,5]] Explanation: - diff[0][0] = onesRow0 + onesCol0 - zerosRow0 - zerosCol0 = 3 + 2 - 0 - 0 = 5 - diff[0][1] = onesRow0 + onesCol1 - zerosRow0 - zerosCol1 = 3 + 2 - 0 - 0 = 5 - diff[0][2] = onesRow0 + onesCol2 - zerosRow0 - zerosCol2 = 3 + 2 - 0 - 0 = 5 - diff[1][0] = onesRow1 + onesCol0 - zerosRow1 - zerosCol0 = 3 + 2 - 0 - 0 = 5 - diff[1][1] = onesRow1 + onesCol1 - zerosRow1 - zerosCol1 = 3 + 2 - 0 - 0 = 5 - diff[1][2] = onesRow1 + onesCol2 - zerosRow1 - zerosCol2 = 3 + 2 - 0 - 0 = 5
Constraints:
m == grid.lengthn == grid[i].length1 <= m, n <= 1051 <= m * n <= 105grid[i][j] is either 0 or 1.Problem summary: You are given a 0-indexed m x n binary matrix grid. A 0-indexed m x n difference matrix diff is created with the following procedure: Let the number of ones in the ith row be onesRowi. Let the number of ones in the jth column be onesColj. Let the number of zeros in the ith row be zerosRowi. Let the number of zeros in the jth column be zerosColj. diff[i][j] = onesRowi + onesColj - zerosRowi - zerosColj Return the difference matrix diff.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[[0,1,1],[1,0,1],[0,0,1]]
[[1,1,1],[1,1,1]]
01-matrix)special-positions-in-a-binary-matrix)remove-all-ones-with-row-and-column-flips)first-completely-painted-row-or-column)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2482: Difference Between Ones and Zeros in Row and Column
class Solution {
public int[][] onesMinusZeros(int[][] grid) {
int m = grid.length, n = grid[0].length;
int[] rows = new int[m];
int[] cols = new int[n];
for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
int v = grid[i][j];
rows[i] += v;
cols[j] += v;
}
}
int[][] diff = new int[m][n];
for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
diff[i][j] = rows[i] + cols[j] - (n - rows[i]) - (m - cols[j]);
}
}
return diff;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2482: Difference Between Ones and Zeros in Row and Column
func onesMinusZeros(grid [][]int) [][]int {
m, n := len(grid), len(grid[0])
rows := make([]int, m)
cols := make([]int, n)
diff := make([][]int, m)
for i, row := range grid {
diff[i] = make([]int, n)
for j, v := range row {
rows[i] += v
cols[j] += v
}
}
for i, r := range rows {
for j, c := range cols {
diff[i][j] = r + c - (n - r) - (m - c)
}
}
return diff
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2482: Difference Between Ones and Zeros in Row and Column
class Solution:
def onesMinusZeros(self, grid: List[List[int]]) -> List[List[int]]:
m, n = len(grid), len(grid[0])
rows = [0] * m
cols = [0] * n
for i, row in enumerate(grid):
for j, v in enumerate(row):
rows[i] += v
cols[j] += v
diff = [[0] * n for _ in range(m)]
for i, r in enumerate(rows):
for j, c in enumerate(cols):
diff[i][j] = r + c - (n - r) - (m - c)
return diff
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2482: Difference Between Ones and Zeros in Row and Column
impl Solution {
pub fn ones_minus_zeros(grid: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> Vec<Vec<i32>> {
let m = grid.len();
let n = grid[0].len();
let mut rows = vec![0; m];
let mut cols = vec![0; n];
for i in 0..m {
for j in 0..n {
if grid[i][j] == 1 {
rows[i] += 1;
cols[j] += 1;
}
}
}
let mut ans = vec![vec![0; n]; m];
for i in 0..m {
for j in 0..n {
ans[i][j] = (rows[i] + cols[j] - (m - rows[i]) - (n - cols[j])) as i32;
}
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2482: Difference Between Ones and Zeros in Row and Column
function onesMinusZeros(grid: number[][]): number[][] {
const m = grid.length;
const n = grid[0].length;
const rows = new Array(m).fill(0);
const cols = new Array(n).fill(0);
for (let i = 0; i < m; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j < n; j++) {
if (grid[i][j]) {
rows[i]++;
cols[j]++;
}
}
}
const ans = Array.from({ length: m }, () => new Array(n).fill(0));
for (let i = 0; i < m; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j < n; j++) {
ans[i][j] = rows[i] + cols[j] - (m - rows[i]) - (n - cols[j]);
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.