Overflow in intermediate arithmetic
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using math strategy.
You are given a positive integer n.
Continuously replace n with the sum of its prime factors.
n multiple times, it should be included in the sum as many times as it divides n.Return the smallest value n will take on.
Example 1:
Input: n = 15 Output: 5 Explanation: Initially, n = 15. 15 = 3 * 5, so replace n with 3 + 5 = 8. 8 = 2 * 2 * 2, so replace n with 2 + 2 + 2 = 6. 6 = 2 * 3, so replace n with 2 + 3 = 5. 5 is the smallest value n will take on.
Example 2:
Input: n = 3 Output: 3 Explanation: Initially, n = 3. 3 is the smallest value n will take on.
Constraints:
2 <= n <= 105Problem summary: You are given a positive integer n. Continuously replace n with the sum of its prime factors. Note that if a prime factor divides n multiple times, it should be included in the sum as many times as it divides n. Return the smallest value n will take on.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Math
15
3
happy-number)2-keys-keyboard)count-ways-to-make-array-with-product)distinct-prime-factors-of-product-of-array)minimum-division-operations-to-make-array-non-decreasing)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2507: Smallest Value After Replacing With Sum of Prime Factors
class Solution {
public int smallestValue(int n) {
while (true) {
int t = n, s = 0;
for (int i = 2; i <= n / i; ++i) {
while (n % i == 0) {
s += i;
n /= i;
}
}
if (n > 1) {
s += n;
}
if (s == t) {
return s;
}
n = s;
}
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2507: Smallest Value After Replacing With Sum of Prime Factors
func smallestValue(n int) int {
for {
t, s := n, 0
for i := 2; i <= n/i; i++ {
for n%i == 0 {
s += i
n /= i
}
}
if n > 1 {
s += n
}
if s == t {
return s
}
n = s
}
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2507: Smallest Value After Replacing With Sum of Prime Factors
class Solution:
def smallestValue(self, n: int) -> int:
while 1:
t, s, i = n, 0, 2
while i <= n // i:
while n % i == 0:
n //= i
s += i
i += 1
if n > 1:
s += n
if s == t:
return t
n = s
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2507: Smallest Value After Replacing With Sum of Prime Factors
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2507: Smallest Value After Replacing With Sum of Prime Factors
// class Solution {
// public int smallestValue(int n) {
// while (true) {
// int t = n, s = 0;
// for (int i = 2; i <= n / i; ++i) {
// while (n % i == 0) {
// s += i;
// n /= i;
// }
// }
// if (n > 1) {
// s += n;
// }
// if (s == t) {
// return s;
// }
// n = s;
// }
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2507: Smallest Value After Replacing With Sum of Prime Factors
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from java.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2507: Smallest Value After Replacing With Sum of Prime Factors
// class Solution {
// public int smallestValue(int n) {
// while (true) {
// int t = n, s = 0;
// for (int i = 2; i <= n / i; ++i) {
// while (n % i == 0) {
// s += i;
// n /= i;
// }
// }
// if (n > 1) {
// s += n;
// }
// if (s == t) {
// return s;
// }
// n = s;
// }
// }
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Simulate the process step by step — multiply n times, check each number up to n, or iterate through all possibilities. Each step is O(1), but doing it n times gives O(n). No extra space needed since we just track running state.
Math problems often have a closed-form or O(log n) solution hidden behind an O(n) simulation. Modular arithmetic, fast exponentiation (repeated squaring), GCD (Euclidean algorithm), and number theory properties can dramatically reduce complexity.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.