LeetCode #2521 — MEDIUM

Distinct Prime Factors of Product of Array

Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.

Solve on LeetCode
The Problem

Problem Statement

Given an array of positive integers nums, return the number of distinct prime factors in the product of the elements of nums.

Note that:

  • A number greater than 1 is called prime if it is divisible by only 1 and itself.
  • An integer val1 is a factor of another integer val2 if val2 / val1 is an integer.

Example 1:

Input: nums = [2,4,3,7,10,6]
Output: 4
Explanation:
The product of all the elements in nums is: 2 * 4 * 3 * 7 * 10 * 6 = 10080 = 25 * 32 * 5 * 7.
There are 4 distinct prime factors so we return 4.

Example 2:

Input: nums = [2,4,8,16]
Output: 1
Explanation:
The product of all the elements in nums is: 2 * 4 * 8 * 16 = 1024 = 210.
There is 1 distinct prime factor so we return 1.

Constraints:

  • 1 <= nums.length <= 104
  • 2 <= nums[i] <= 1000

Roadmap

  1. Brute Force Baseline
  2. Core Insight
  3. Algorithm Walkthrough
  4. Edge Cases
  5. Full Annotated Code
  6. Interactive Study Demo
  7. Complexity Analysis
Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: Given an array of positive integers nums, return the number of distinct prime factors in the product of the elements of nums. Note that: A number greater than 1 is called prime if it is divisible by only 1 and itself. An integer val1 is a factor of another integer val2 if val2 / val1 is an integer.

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map · Math

Example 1

[2,4,3,7,10,6]

Example 2

[2,4,8,16]

Related Problems

  • 2 Keys Keyboard (2-keys-keyboard)
  • Largest Component Size by Common Factor (largest-component-size-by-common-factor)
  • Closest Divisors (closest-divisors)
  • Smallest Value After Replacing With Sum of Prime Factors (smallest-value-after-replacing-with-sum-of-prime-factors)
  • Count the Number of Square-Free Subsets (count-the-number-of-square-free-subsets)
Step 02

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

  • Do not multiply all the numbers together, as the product is too big to store.
  • Think about how each individual number's prime factors contribute to the prime factors of the product of the entire array.
  • Find the prime factors of each element in nums, and store all of them in a set to avoid duplicates.
Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.
Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

  1. Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
  2. Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
  3. Record answer candidate when condition is met.
  4. Continue until all input is consumed.
Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.
Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input
Single element / shortest valid input
Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.
Duplicates & Repeats
Repeated values / repeated states
Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.
Extreme Constraints
Upper-end input sizes
Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.
Invalid / Corner Shape
Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures
Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.
Step 05

Full Annotated Code

Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2521: Distinct Prime Factors of Product of Array
class Solution {
    public int distinctPrimeFactors(int[] nums) {
        Set<Integer> s = new HashSet<>();
        for (int n : nums) {
            for (int i = 2; i <= n / i; ++i) {
                if (n % i == 0) {
                    s.add(i);
                    while (n % i == 0) {
                        n /= i;
                    }
                }
            }
            if (n > 1) {
                s.add(n);
            }
        }
        return s.size();
    }
}
Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Press Step or Run All to begin.
Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time
O(n × sqrtm)
Space
O(\fracmlog m)

Approach Breakdown

BRUTE FORCE
O(n²) time
O(1) space

Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.

OPTIMIZED
O(n) time
O(1) space

Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.

Shortcut: If you are using nested loops on an array, there is almost always an O(n) solution. Look for the right auxiliary state.
Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

Off-by-one on range boundaries

Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.

Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.

Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.

Mutating counts without cleanup

Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.

Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.

Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.

Overflow in intermediate arithmetic

Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.

Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.

Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.