Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
Given a 0-indexed integer array nums of size n containing all numbers from 1 to n, return the number of increasing quadruplets.
A quadruplet (i, j, k, l) is increasing if:
0 <= i < j < k < l < n, andnums[i] < nums[k] < nums[j] < nums[l].Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,3,2,4,5] Output: 2 Explanation: - When i = 0, j = 1, k = 2, and l = 3, nums[i] < nums[k] < nums[j] < nums[l]. - When i = 0, j = 1, k = 2, and l = 4, nums[i] < nums[k] < nums[j] < nums[l]. There are no other quadruplets, so we return 2.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [1,2,3,4] Output: 0 Explanation: There exists only one quadruplet with i = 0, j = 1, k = 2, l = 3, but since nums[j] < nums[k], we return 0.
Constraints:
4 <= nums.length <= 40001 <= nums[i] <= nums.lengthnums are unique. nums is a permutation.Problem summary: Given a 0-indexed integer array nums of size n containing all numbers from 1 to n, return the number of increasing quadruplets. A quadruplet (i, j, k, l) is increasing if: 0 <= i < j < k < l < n, and nums[i] < nums[k] < nums[j] < nums[l].
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Dynamic Programming · Segment Tree
[1,3,2,4,5]
[1,2,3,4]
increasing-triplet-subsequence)count-special-quadruplets)count-good-triplets-in-an-array)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2552: Count Increasing Quadruplets
class Solution {
public long countQuadruplets(int[] nums) {
int n = nums.length;
int[][] f = new int[n][n];
int[][] g = new int[n][n];
for (int j = 1; j < n - 2; ++j) {
int cnt = 0;
for (int l = j + 1; l < n; ++l) {
if (nums[l] > nums[j]) {
++cnt;
}
}
for (int k = j + 1; k < n - 1; ++k) {
if (nums[j] > nums[k]) {
f[j][k] = cnt;
} else {
--cnt;
}
}
}
long ans = 0;
for (int k = 2; k < n - 1; ++k) {
int cnt = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < k; ++i) {
if (nums[i] < nums[k]) {
++cnt;
}
}
for (int j = k - 1; j > 0; --j) {
if (nums[j] > nums[k]) {
g[j][k] = cnt;
ans += (long) f[j][k] * g[j][k];
} else {
--cnt;
}
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2552: Count Increasing Quadruplets
func countQuadruplets(nums []int) int64 {
n := len(nums)
f := make([][]int, n)
g := make([][]int, n)
for i := range f {
f[i] = make([]int, n)
g[i] = make([]int, n)
}
for j := 1; j < n-2; j++ {
cnt := 0
for l := j + 1; l < n; l++ {
if nums[l] > nums[j] {
cnt++
}
}
for k := j + 1; k < n-1; k++ {
if nums[j] > nums[k] {
f[j][k] = cnt
} else {
cnt--
}
}
}
ans := 0
for k := 2; k < n-1; k++ {
cnt := 0
for i := 0; i < k; i++ {
if nums[i] < nums[k] {
cnt++
}
}
for j := k - 1; j > 0; j-- {
if nums[j] > nums[k] {
g[j][k] = cnt
ans += f[j][k] * g[j][k]
} else {
cnt--
}
}
}
return int64(ans)
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2552: Count Increasing Quadruplets
class Solution:
def countQuadruplets(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
n = len(nums)
f = [[0] * n for _ in range(n)]
g = [[0] * n for _ in range(n)]
for j in range(1, n - 2):
cnt = sum(nums[l] > nums[j] for l in range(j + 1, n))
for k in range(j + 1, n - 1):
if nums[j] > nums[k]:
f[j][k] = cnt
else:
cnt -= 1
for k in range(2, n - 1):
cnt = sum(nums[i] < nums[k] for i in range(k))
for j in range(k - 1, 0, -1):
if nums[j] > nums[k]:
g[j][k] = cnt
else:
cnt -= 1
return sum(
f[j][k] * g[j][k] for j in range(1, n - 2) for k in range(j + 1, n - 1)
)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2552: Count Increasing Quadruplets
/**
* [2552] Count Increasing Quadruplets
*/
pub struct Solution {}
// submission codes start here
impl Solution {
pub fn count_quadruplets(nums: Vec<i32>) -> i64 {
let nums: Vec<usize> = nums.iter().map(|x| *x as usize).collect();
let n = nums.len();
let mut pre = vec![0; n + 1];
let mut result = 0;
for j in 0..n {
let mut suffix = 0;
for k in (j + 1..n).rev() {
if nums[j] > nums[k] {
result += pre[nums[k]] * suffix;
} else {
suffix += 1;
}
}
for i in nums[j] + 1..=n {
pre[i] += 1;
}
}
result
}
}
// submission codes end
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_2552() {
assert_eq!(2, Solution::count_quadruplets(vec![1, 3, 2, 4, 5]));
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2552: Count Increasing Quadruplets
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from java.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2552: Count Increasing Quadruplets
// class Solution {
// public long countQuadruplets(int[] nums) {
// int n = nums.length;
// int[][] f = new int[n][n];
// int[][] g = new int[n][n];
// for (int j = 1; j < n - 2; ++j) {
// int cnt = 0;
// for (int l = j + 1; l < n; ++l) {
// if (nums[l] > nums[j]) {
// ++cnt;
// }
// }
// for (int k = j + 1; k < n - 1; ++k) {
// if (nums[j] > nums[k]) {
// f[j][k] = cnt;
// } else {
// --cnt;
// }
// }
// }
// long ans = 0;
// for (int k = 2; k < n - 1; ++k) {
// int cnt = 0;
// for (int i = 0; i < k; ++i) {
// if (nums[i] < nums[k]) {
// ++cnt;
// }
// }
// for (int j = k - 1; j > 0; --j) {
// if (nums[j] > nums[k]) {
// g[j][k] = cnt;
// ans += (long) f[j][k] * g[j][k];
// } else {
// --cnt;
// }
// }
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.
Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.
Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.
Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.