Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums of size n.
Define two arrays leftSum and rightSum where:
leftSum[i] is the sum of elements to the left of the index i in the array nums. If there is no such element, leftSum[i] = 0.rightSum[i] is the sum of elements to the right of the index i in the array nums. If there is no such element, rightSum[i] = 0.Return an integer array answer of size n where answer[i] = |leftSum[i] - rightSum[i]|.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [10,4,8,3] Output: [15,1,11,22] Explanation: The array leftSum is [0,10,14,22] and the array rightSum is [15,11,3,0]. The array answer is [|0 - 15|,|10 - 11|,|14 - 3|,|22 - 0|] = [15,1,11,22].
Example 2:
Input: nums = [1] Output: [0] Explanation: The array leftSum is [0] and the array rightSum is [0]. The array answer is [|0 - 0|] = [0].
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 10001 <= nums[i] <= 105Problem summary: You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums of size n. Define two arrays leftSum and rightSum where: leftSum[i] is the sum of elements to the left of the index i in the array nums. If there is no such element, leftSum[i] = 0. rightSum[i] is the sum of elements to the right of the index i in the array nums. If there is no such element, rightSum[i] = 0. Return an integer array answer of size n where answer[i] = |leftSum[i] - rightSum[i]|.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[10,4,8,3]
[1]
find-pivot-index)find-the-middle-index-in-array)find-the-distinct-difference-array)find-the-n-th-value-after-k-seconds)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2574: Left and Right Sum Differences
class Solution {
public int[] leftRigthDifference(int[] nums) {
int left = 0, right = Arrays.stream(nums).sum();
int n = nums.length;
int[] ans = new int[n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
right -= nums[i];
ans[i] = Math.abs(left - right);
left += nums[i];
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2574: Left and Right Sum Differences
func leftRigthDifference(nums []int) (ans []int) {
var left, right int
for _, x := range nums {
right += x
}
for _, x := range nums {
right -= x
ans = append(ans, abs(left-right))
left += x
}
return
}
func abs(x int) int {
if x < 0 {
return -x
}
return x
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2574: Left and Right Sum Differences
class Solution:
def leftRigthDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> List[int]:
left, right = 0, sum(nums)
ans = []
for x in nums:
right -= x
ans.append(abs(left - right))
left += x
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2574: Left and Right Sum Differences
impl Solution {
pub fn left_rigth_difference(nums: Vec<i32>) -> Vec<i32> {
let mut left = 0;
let mut right = nums.iter().sum::<i32>();
nums.iter()
.map(|v| {
right -= v;
let res = (left - right).abs();
left += v;
res
})
.collect()
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2574: Left and Right Sum Differences
function leftRigthDifference(nums: number[]): number[] {
let left = 0,
right = nums.reduce((a, b) => a + b);
const ans: number[] = [];
for (const x of nums) {
right -= x;
ans.push(Math.abs(left - right));
left += x;
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.