Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on core interview patterns fundamentals.
Write a generator function that returns a generator object which yields the fibonacci sequence.
The fibonacci sequence is defined by the relation Xn = Xn-1 + Xn-2.
The first few numbers of the series are 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13.
Example 1:
Input: callCount = 5 Output: [0,1,1,2,3] Explanation: const gen = fibGenerator(); gen.next().value; // 0 gen.next().value; // 1 gen.next().value; // 1 gen.next().value; // 2 gen.next().value; // 3
Example 2:
Input: callCount = 0 Output: [] Explanation: gen.next() is never called so nothing is outputted
Constraints:
0 <= callCount <= 50Problem summary: Write a generator function that returns a generator object which yields the fibonacci sequence. The fibonacci sequence is defined by the relation Xn = Xn-1 + Xn-2. The first few numbers of the series are 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
5
0
nested-array-generator)design-cancellable-function)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2648: Generate Fibonacci Sequence
// Auto-generated Java example from ts.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (ts):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2648: Generate Fibonacci Sequence
// function* fibGenerator(): Generator<number, any, number> {
// let a = 0;
// let b = 1;
// while (true) {
// yield a;
// [a, b] = [b, a + b];
// }
// }
//
// /**
// * const gen = fibGenerator();
// * gen.next().value; // 0
// * gen.next().value; // 1
// */
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2648: Generate Fibonacci Sequence
// Auto-generated Go example from ts.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (ts):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2648: Generate Fibonacci Sequence
// function* fibGenerator(): Generator<number, any, number> {
// let a = 0;
// let b = 1;
// while (true) {
// yield a;
// [a, b] = [b, a + b];
// }
// }
//
// /**
// * const gen = fibGenerator();
// * gen.next().value; // 0
// * gen.next().value; // 1
// */
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2648: Generate Fibonacci Sequence
# Auto-generated Python example from ts.
def example_solution() -> None:
return
# Reference (ts):
# // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2648: Generate Fibonacci Sequence
# function* fibGenerator(): Generator<number, any, number> {
# let a = 0;
# let b = 1;
# while (true) {
# yield a;
# [a, b] = [b, a + b];
# }
# }
#
# /**
# * const gen = fibGenerator();
# * gen.next().value; // 0
# * gen.next().value; // 1
# */
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2648: Generate Fibonacci Sequence
// Rust example auto-generated from ts reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (ts):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2648: Generate Fibonacci Sequence
// function* fibGenerator(): Generator<number, any, number> {
// let a = 0;
// let b = 1;
// while (true) {
// yield a;
// [a, b] = [b, a + b];
// }
// }
//
// /**
// * const gen = fibGenerator();
// * gen.next().value; // 0
// * gen.next().value; // 1
// */
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2648: Generate Fibonacci Sequence
function* fibGenerator(): Generator<number, any, number> {
let a = 0;
let b = 1;
while (true) {
yield a;
[a, b] = [b, a + b];
}
}
/**
* const gen = fibGenerator();
* gen.next().value; // 0
* gen.next().value; // 1
*/
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.