Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given two 0-indexed integer permutations A and B of length n.
A prefix common array of A and B is an array C such that C[i] is equal to the count of numbers that are present at or before the index i in both A and B.
Return the prefix common array of A and B.
A sequence of n integers is called a permutation if it contains all integers from 1 to n exactly once.
Example 1:
Input: A = [1,3,2,4], B = [3,1,2,4] Output: [0,2,3,4] Explanation: At i = 0: no number is common, so C[0] = 0. At i = 1: 1 and 3 are common in A and B, so C[1] = 2. At i = 2: 1, 2, and 3 are common in A and B, so C[2] = 3. At i = 3: 1, 2, 3, and 4 are common in A and B, so C[3] = 4.
Example 2:
Input: A = [2,3,1], B = [3,1,2] Output: [0,1,3] Explanation: At i = 0: no number is common, so C[0] = 0. At i = 1: only 3 is common in A and B, so C[1] = 1. At i = 2: 1, 2, and 3 are common in A and B, so C[2] = 3.
Constraints:
1 <= A.length == B.length == n <= 501 <= A[i], B[i] <= nIt is guaranteed that A and B are both a permutation of n integers.Problem summary: You are given two 0-indexed integer permutations A and B of length n. A prefix common array of A and B is an array C such that C[i] is equal to the count of numbers that are present at or before the index i in both A and B. Return the prefix common array of A and B. A sequence of n integers is called a permutation if it contains all integers from 1 to n exactly once.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map · Bit Manipulation
[1,3,2,4] [3,1,2,4]
[2,3,1] [3,1,2]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2657: Find the Prefix Common Array of Two Arrays
class Solution {
public int[] findThePrefixCommonArray(int[] A, int[] B) {
int n = A.length;
int[] ans = new int[n];
int[] cnt1 = new int[n + 1];
int[] cnt2 = new int[n + 1];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
++cnt1[A[i]];
++cnt2[B[i]];
for (int j = 1; j <= n; ++j) {
ans[i] += Math.min(cnt1[j], cnt2[j]);
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2657: Find the Prefix Common Array of Two Arrays
func findThePrefixCommonArray(A []int, B []int) []int {
n := len(A)
cnt1 := make([]int, n+1)
cnt2 := make([]int, n+1)
ans := make([]int, n)
for i, a := range A {
b := B[i]
cnt1[a]++
cnt2[b]++
for j := 1; j <= n; j++ {
ans[i] += min(cnt1[j], cnt2[j])
}
}
return ans
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2657: Find the Prefix Common Array of Two Arrays
class Solution:
def findThePrefixCommonArray(self, A: List[int], B: List[int]) -> List[int]:
ans = []
cnt1 = Counter()
cnt2 = Counter()
for a, b in zip(A, B):
cnt1[a] += 1
cnt2[b] += 1
t = sum(min(v, cnt2[x]) for x, v in cnt1.items())
ans.append(t)
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2657: Find the Prefix Common Array of Two Arrays
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2657: Find the Prefix Common Array of Two Arrays
// class Solution {
// public int[] findThePrefixCommonArray(int[] A, int[] B) {
// int n = A.length;
// int[] ans = new int[n];
// int[] cnt1 = new int[n + 1];
// int[] cnt2 = new int[n + 1];
// for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
// ++cnt1[A[i]];
// ++cnt2[B[i]];
// for (int j = 1; j <= n; ++j) {
// ans[i] += Math.min(cnt1[j], cnt2[j]);
// }
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2657: Find the Prefix Common Array of Two Arrays
function findThePrefixCommonArray(A: number[], B: number[]): number[] {
const n = A.length;
const cnt1: number[] = Array(n + 1).fill(0);
const cnt2: number[] = Array(n + 1).fill(0);
const ans: number[] = Array(n).fill(0);
for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
++cnt1[A[i]];
++cnt2[B[i]];
for (let j = 1; j <= n; ++j) {
ans[i] += Math.min(cnt1[j], cnt2[j]);
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Sort the array in O(n log n), then scan for the missing or unique element by comparing adjacent pairs. Sorting requires O(n) auxiliary space (or O(1) with in-place sort but O(n log n) time remains). The sort step dominates.
Bitwise operations (AND, OR, XOR, shifts) are O(1) per operation on fixed-width integers. A single pass through the input with bit operations gives O(n) time. The key insight: XOR of a number with itself is 0, which eliminates duplicates without extra space.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.