Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on core interview patterns fundamentals.
argumentsLength that returns the count of arguments passed to it.
Example 1:
Input: args = [5] Output: 1 Explanation: argumentsLength(5); // 1 One value was passed to the function so it should return 1.
Example 2:
Input: args = [{}, null, "3"]
Output: 3
Explanation:
argumentsLength({}, null, "3"); // 3
Three values were passed to the function so it should return 3.
Constraints:
args is a valid JSON array0 <= args.length <= 100Problem summary: Write a function argumentsLength that returns the count of arguments passed to it.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
[5]
[{},null,"3"]Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2703: Return Length of Arguments Passed
// Auto-generated Java example from ts.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (ts):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2703: Return Length of Arguments Passed
// function argumentsLength(...args: any[]): number {
// return args.length;
// }
//
// /**
// * argumentsLength(1, 2, 3); // 3
// */
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2703: Return Length of Arguments Passed
// Auto-generated Go example from ts.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (ts):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2703: Return Length of Arguments Passed
// function argumentsLength(...args: any[]): number {
// return args.length;
// }
//
// /**
// * argumentsLength(1, 2, 3); // 3
// */
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2703: Return Length of Arguments Passed
# Auto-generated Python example from ts.
def example_solution() -> None:
return
# Reference (ts):
# // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2703: Return Length of Arguments Passed
# function argumentsLength(...args: any[]): number {
# return args.length;
# }
#
# /**
# * argumentsLength(1, 2, 3); // 3
# */
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2703: Return Length of Arguments Passed
// Rust example auto-generated from ts reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (ts):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2703: Return Length of Arguments Passed
// function argumentsLength(...args: any[]): number {
// return args.length;
// }
//
// /**
// * argumentsLength(1, 2, 3); // 3
// */
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2703: Return Length of Arguments Passed
function argumentsLength(...args: any[]): number {
return args.length;
}
/**
* argumentsLength(1, 2, 3); // 3
*/
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.