Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on core interview patterns fundamentals.
Write a function expect that helps developers test their code. It should take in any value val and return an object with the following two functions.
toBe(val) accepts another value and returns true if the two values === each other. If they are not equal, it should throw an error "Not Equal".notToBe(val) accepts another value and returns true if the two values !== each other. If they are equal, it should throw an error "Equal".Example 1:
Input: func = () => expect(5).toBe(5)
Output: {"value": true}
Explanation: 5 === 5 so this expression returns true.
Example 2:
Input: func = () => expect(5).toBe(null)
Output: {"error": "Not Equal"}
Explanation: 5 !== null so this expression throw the error "Not Equal".
Example 3:
Input: func = () => expect(5).notToBe(null)
Output: {"value": true}
Explanation: 5 !== null so this expression returns true.
Problem summary: Write a function expect that helps developers test their code. It should take in any value val and return an object with the following two functions. toBe(val) accepts another value and returns true if the two values === each other. If they are not equal, it should throw an error "Not Equal". notToBe(val) accepts another value and returns true if the two values !== each other. If they are equal, it should throw an error "Equal".
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
() => expect(5).toBe(5)
() => expect(5).toBe(null)
() => expect(5).notToBe(null)
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2704: To Be Or Not To Be
// Auto-generated Java example from ts.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (ts):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2704: To Be Or Not To Be
// type ToBeOrNotToBe = {
// toBe: (val: any) => boolean;
// notToBe: (val: any) => boolean;
// };
//
// function expect(val: any): ToBeOrNotToBe {
// return {
// toBe: (toBeVal: any) => {
// if (val !== toBeVal) {
// throw new Error('Not Equal');
// }
// return true;
// },
// notToBe: (notToBeVal: any) => {
// if (val === notToBeVal) {
// throw new Error('Equal');
// }
// return true;
// },
// };
// }
//
// /**
// * expect(5).toBe(5); // true
// * expect(5).notToBe(5); // throws "Equal"
// */
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2704: To Be Or Not To Be
// Auto-generated Go example from ts.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (ts):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2704: To Be Or Not To Be
// type ToBeOrNotToBe = {
// toBe: (val: any) => boolean;
// notToBe: (val: any) => boolean;
// };
//
// function expect(val: any): ToBeOrNotToBe {
// return {
// toBe: (toBeVal: any) => {
// if (val !== toBeVal) {
// throw new Error('Not Equal');
// }
// return true;
// },
// notToBe: (notToBeVal: any) => {
// if (val === notToBeVal) {
// throw new Error('Equal');
// }
// return true;
// },
// };
// }
//
// /**
// * expect(5).toBe(5); // true
// * expect(5).notToBe(5); // throws "Equal"
// */
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2704: To Be Or Not To Be
# Auto-generated Python example from ts.
def example_solution() -> None:
return
# Reference (ts):
# // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2704: To Be Or Not To Be
# type ToBeOrNotToBe = {
# toBe: (val: any) => boolean;
# notToBe: (val: any) => boolean;
# };
#
# function expect(val: any): ToBeOrNotToBe {
# return {
# toBe: (toBeVal: any) => {
# if (val !== toBeVal) {
# throw new Error('Not Equal');
# }
# return true;
# },
# notToBe: (notToBeVal: any) => {
# if (val === notToBeVal) {
# throw new Error('Equal');
# }
# return true;
# },
# };
# }
#
# /**
# * expect(5).toBe(5); // true
# * expect(5).notToBe(5); // throws "Equal"
# */
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2704: To Be Or Not To Be
// Rust example auto-generated from ts reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (ts):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2704: To Be Or Not To Be
// type ToBeOrNotToBe = {
// toBe: (val: any) => boolean;
// notToBe: (val: any) => boolean;
// };
//
// function expect(val: any): ToBeOrNotToBe {
// return {
// toBe: (toBeVal: any) => {
// if (val !== toBeVal) {
// throw new Error('Not Equal');
// }
// return true;
// },
// notToBe: (notToBeVal: any) => {
// if (val === notToBeVal) {
// throw new Error('Equal');
// }
// return true;
// },
// };
// }
//
// /**
// * expect(5).toBe(5); // true
// * expect(5).notToBe(5); // throws "Equal"
// */
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2704: To Be Or Not To Be
type ToBeOrNotToBe = {
toBe: (val: any) => boolean;
notToBe: (val: any) => boolean;
};
function expect(val: any): ToBeOrNotToBe {
return {
toBe: (toBeVal: any) => {
if (val !== toBeVal) {
throw new Error('Not Equal');
}
return true;
},
notToBe: (notToBeVal: any) => {
if (val === notToBeVal) {
throw new Error('Equal');
}
return true;
},
};
}
/**
* expect(5).toBe(5); // true
* expect(5).notToBe(5); // throws "Equal"
*/
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.