Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using bit manipulation strategy.
You are given two integers num1 and num2.
In one operation, you can choose integer i in the range [0, 60] and subtract 2i + num2 from num1.
Return the integer denoting the minimum number of operations needed to make num1 equal to 0.
If it is impossible to make num1 equal to 0, return -1.
Example 1:
Input: num1 = 3, num2 = -2 Output: 3 Explanation: We can make 3 equal to 0 with the following operations: - We choose i = 2 and subtract 22 + (-2) from 3, 3 - (4 + (-2)) = 1. - We choose i = 2 and subtract 22 + (-2) from 1, 1 - (4 + (-2)) = -1. - We choose i = 0 and subtract 20 + (-2) from -1, (-1) - (1 + (-2)) = 0. It can be proven, that 3 is the minimum number of operations that we need to perform.
Example 2:
Input: num1 = 5, num2 = 7 Output: -1 Explanation: It can be proven, that it is impossible to make 5 equal to 0 with the given operation.
Constraints:
1 <= num1 <= 109-109 <= num2 <= 109Problem summary: You are given two integers num1 and num2. In one operation, you can choose integer i in the range [0, 60] and subtract 2i + num2 from num1. Return the integer denoting the minimum number of operations needed to make num1 equal to 0. If it is impossible to make num1 equal to 0, return -1.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Bit Manipulation
3 -2
5 7
broken-calculator)minimum-operations-to-reduce-x-to-zero)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2749: Minimum Operations to Make the Integer Zero
class Solution {
public int makeTheIntegerZero(int num1, int num2) {
for (long k = 1;; ++k) {
long x = num1 - k * num2;
if (x < 0) {
break;
}
if (Long.bitCount(x) <= k && k <= x) {
return (int) k;
}
}
return -1;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2749: Minimum Operations to Make the Integer Zero
func makeTheIntegerZero(num1 int, num2 int) int {
for k := 1; ; k++ {
x := num1 - k*num2
if x < 0 {
break
}
if bits.OnesCount(uint(x)) <= k && k <= x {
return k
}
}
return -1
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2749: Minimum Operations to Make the Integer Zero
class Solution:
def makeTheIntegerZero(self, num1: int, num2: int) -> int:
for k in count(1):
x = num1 - k * num2
if x < 0:
break
if x.bit_count() <= k <= x:
return k
return -1
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2749: Minimum Operations to Make the Integer Zero
impl Solution {
pub fn make_the_integer_zero(num1: i32, num2: i32) -> i32 {
let num1 = num1 as i64;
let num2 = num2 as i64;
for k in 1.. {
let x = num1 - k * num2;
if x < 0 {
break;
}
if (x.count_ones() as i64) <= k && k <= x {
return k as i32;
}
}
-1
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2749: Minimum Operations to Make the Integer Zero
function makeTheIntegerZero(num1: number, num2: number): number {
for (let k = 1; ; ++k) {
let x = num1 - k * num2;
if (x < 0) {
break;
}
if (x.toString(2).replace(/0/g, '').length <= k && k <= x) {
return k;
}
}
return -1;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Sort the array in O(n log n), then scan for the missing or unique element by comparing adjacent pairs. Sorting requires O(n) auxiliary space (or O(1) with in-place sort but O(n log n) time remains). The sort step dominates.
Bitwise operations (AND, OR, XOR, shifts) are O(1) per operation on fixed-width integers. A single pass through the input with bit operations gives O(n) time. The key insight: XOR of a number with itself is 0, which eliminates duplicates without extra space.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.