Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given an integer n. We say that two integers x and y form a prime number pair if:
1 <= x <= y <= nx + y == nx and y are prime numbersReturn the 2D sorted list of prime number pairs [xi, yi]. The list should be sorted in increasing order of xi. If there are no prime number pairs at all, return an empty array.
Note: A prime number is a natural number greater than 1 with only two factors, itself and 1.
Example 1:
Input: n = 10 Output: [[3,7],[5,5]] Explanation: In this example, there are two prime pairs that satisfy the criteria. These pairs are [3,7] and [5,5], and we return them in the sorted order as described in the problem statement.
Example 2:
Input: n = 2 Output: [] Explanation: We can show that there is no prime number pair that gives a sum of 2, so we return an empty array.
Constraints:
1 <= n <= 106Problem summary: You are given an integer n. We say that two integers x and y form a prime number pair if: 1 <= x <= y <= n x + y == n x and y are prime numbers Return the 2D sorted list of prime number pairs [xi, yi]. The list should be sorted in increasing order of xi. If there are no prime number pairs at all, return an empty array. Note: A prime number is a natural number greater than 1 with only two factors, itself and 1.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Math
10
2
count-primes)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2761: Prime Pairs With Target Sum
class Solution {
public List<List<Integer>> findPrimePairs(int n) {
boolean[] primes = new boolean[n];
Arrays.fill(primes, true);
for (int i = 2; i < n; ++i) {
if (primes[i]) {
for (int j = i + i; j < n; j += i) {
primes[j] = false;
}
}
}
List<List<Integer>> ans = new ArrayList<>();
for (int x = 2; x <= n / 2; ++x) {
int y = n - x;
if (primes[x] && primes[y]) {
ans.add(List.of(x, y));
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2761: Prime Pairs With Target Sum
func findPrimePairs(n int) (ans [][]int) {
primes := make([]bool, n)
for i := range primes {
primes[i] = true
}
for i := 2; i < n; i++ {
if primes[i] {
for j := i + i; j < n; j += i {
primes[j] = false
}
}
}
for x := 2; x <= n/2; x++ {
y := n - x
if primes[x] && primes[y] {
ans = append(ans, []int{x, y})
}
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2761: Prime Pairs With Target Sum
class Solution:
def findPrimePairs(self, n: int) -> List[List[int]]:
primes = [True] * n
for i in range(2, n):
if primes[i]:
for j in range(i + i, n, i):
primes[j] = False
ans = []
for x in range(2, n // 2 + 1):
y = n - x
if primes[x] and primes[y]:
ans.append([x, y])
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2761: Prime Pairs With Target Sum
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2761: Prime Pairs With Target Sum
// class Solution {
// public List<List<Integer>> findPrimePairs(int n) {
// boolean[] primes = new boolean[n];
// Arrays.fill(primes, true);
// for (int i = 2; i < n; ++i) {
// if (primes[i]) {
// for (int j = i + i; j < n; j += i) {
// primes[j] = false;
// }
// }
// }
// List<List<Integer>> ans = new ArrayList<>();
// for (int x = 2; x <= n / 2; ++x) {
// int y = n - x;
// if (primes[x] && primes[y]) {
// ans.add(List.of(x, y));
// }
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2761: Prime Pairs With Target Sum
function findPrimePairs(n: number): number[][] {
const primes: boolean[] = new Array(n).fill(true);
for (let i = 2; i < n; ++i) {
if (primes[i]) {
for (let j = i + i; j < n; j += i) {
primes[j] = false;
}
}
}
const ans: number[][] = [];
for (let x = 2; x <= n / 2; ++x) {
const y = n - x;
if (primes[x] && primes[y]) {
ans.push([x, y]);
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Temporary multiplications exceed integer bounds.
Usually fails on: Large inputs wrap around unexpectedly.
Fix: Use wider types, modular arithmetic, or rearranged operations.