Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given an array nums of positive integers and an integer k.
In one operation, you can remove the last element of the array and add it to your collection.
Return the minimum number of operations needed to collect elements 1, 2, ..., k.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [3,1,5,4,2], k = 2 Output: 4 Explanation: After 4 operations, we collect elements 2, 4, 5, and 1, in this order. Our collection contains elements 1 and 2. Hence, the answer is 4.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [3,1,5,4,2], k = 5 Output: 5 Explanation: After 5 operations, we collect elements 2, 4, 5, 1, and 3, in this order. Our collection contains elements 1 through 5. Hence, the answer is 5.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [3,2,5,3,1], k = 3 Output: 4 Explanation: After 4 operations, we collect elements 1, 3, 5, and 2, in this order. Our collection contains elements 1 through 3. Hence, the answer is 4.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 501 <= nums[i] <= nums.length1 <= k <= nums.length1, 2, ..., k.Problem summary: You are given an array nums of positive integers and an integer k. In one operation, you can remove the last element of the array and add it to your collection. Return the minimum number of operations needed to collect elements 1, 2, ..., k.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map · Bit Manipulation
[3,1,5,4,2] 2
[3,1,5,4,2] 5
[3,2,5,3,1] 3
build-an-array-with-stack-operations)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2869: Minimum Operations to Collect Elements
class Solution {
public int minOperations(List<Integer> nums, int k) {
boolean[] isAdded = new boolean[k];
int n = nums.size();
int count = 0;
for (int i = n - 1;; i--) {
if (nums.get(i) > k || isAdded[nums.get(i) - 1]) {
continue;
}
isAdded[nums.get(i) - 1] = true;
count++;
if (count == k) {
return n - i;
}
}
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2869: Minimum Operations to Collect Elements
func minOperations(nums []int, k int) int {
isAdded := make([]bool, k)
count := 0
n := len(nums)
for i := n - 1; ; i-- {
if nums[i] > k || isAdded[nums[i]-1] {
continue
}
isAdded[nums[i]-1] = true
count++
if count == k {
return n - i
}
}
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2869: Minimum Operations to Collect Elements
class Solution:
def minOperations(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int:
is_added = [False] * k
count = 0
n = len(nums)
for i in range(n - 1, -1, -1):
if nums[i] > k or is_added[nums[i] - 1]:
continue
is_added[nums[i] - 1] = True
count += 1
if count == k:
return n - i
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2869: Minimum Operations to Collect Elements
fn min_operations(nums: Vec<i32>, k: i32) -> i32 {
let mut nums = nums;
let mask = (1u64 << k as u64) - 1;
let mut ret = 0;
let mut bits = 0u64;
while let Some(n) = nums.pop() {
ret += 1;
bits |= 1u64 << (n as u64 - 1);
if (bits & mask) == mask {
break;
}
}
ret
}
fn main() {
let nums = vec![3, 1, 5, 4, 2];
let ret = min_operations(nums, 2);
println!("ret={ret}");
}
#[test]
fn test_min_operations() {
{
let nums = vec![3, 1, 5, 4, 2];
let ret = min_operations(nums, 2);
assert_eq!(ret, 4);
}
{
let nums = vec![3, 1, 5, 4, 2];
let ret = min_operations(nums, 5);
assert_eq!(ret, 5);
}
{
let nums = vec![3, 2, 5, 3, 1];
let ret = min_operations(nums, 3);
assert_eq!(ret, 4);
}
{
let nums = vec![3,28,33,26,34,20,27,5,21,23,4,21,37,35,32,15,14,1,7,2,9,6,38,17,30,18,16,13,24,29,12,14,8,36,11,31,25,22,10,19];
let ret = min_operations(nums, 38);
assert_eq!(ret, 40);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2869: Minimum Operations to Collect Elements
function minOperations(nums: number[], k: number): number {
const n = nums.length;
const isAdded = Array(k).fill(false);
let count = 0;
for (let i = n - 1; ; --i) {
if (nums[i] > k || isAdded[nums[i] - 1]) {
continue;
}
isAdded[nums[i] - 1] = true;
++count;
if (count === k) {
return n - i;
}
}
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Sort the array in O(n log n), then scan for the missing or unique element by comparing adjacent pairs. Sorting requires O(n) auxiliary space (or O(1) with in-place sort but O(n log n) time remains). The sort step dominates.
Bitwise operations (AND, OR, XOR, shifts) are O(1) per operation on fixed-width integers. A single pass through the input with bit operations gives O(n) time. The key insight: XOR of a number with itself is 0, which eliminates duplicates without extra space.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.