Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on core interview patterns fundamentals.
DataFrame customers +-------------+--------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+--------+ | customer_id | int | | name | object | | email | object | +-------------+--------+
There are some duplicate rows in the DataFrame based on the email column.
Write a solution to remove these duplicate rows and keep only the first occurrence.
The result format is in the following example.
Example 1: Input: +-------------+---------+---------------------+ | customer_id | name | email | +-------------+---------+---------------------+ | 1 | Ella | emily@example.com | | 2 | David | michael@example.com | | 3 | Zachary | sarah@example.com | | 4 | Alice | john@example.com | | 5 | Finn | john@example.com | | 6 | Violet | alice@example.com | +-------------+---------+---------------------+ Output: +-------------+---------+---------------------+ | customer_id | name | email | +-------------+---------+---------------------+ | 1 | Ella | emily@example.com | | 2 | David | michael@example.com | | 3 | Zachary | sarah@example.com | | 4 | Alice | john@example.com | | 6 | Violet | alice@example.com | +-------------+---------+---------------------+ Explanation: Alic (customer_id = 4) and Finn (customer_id = 5) both use john@example.com, so only the first occurrence of this email is retained.
Problem summary: DataFrame customers +-------------+--------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+--------+ | customer_id | int | | name | object | | email | object | +-------------+--------+ There are some duplicate rows in the DataFrame based on the email column. Write a solution to remove these duplicate rows and keep only the first occurrence. The result format is in the following example.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
{"headers":{"customers":["customer_id","name","email"]},"rows":{"customers":[[1,"Ella","emily@example.com"],[2,"David","michael@example.com"],[3,"Zachary","sarah@example.com"],[4,"Alice","john@example.com"],[5,"Finn","john@example.com"],[6,"Violet","alice@example.com"]]}}Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2882: Drop Duplicate Rows
// Auto-generated Java example from py.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2882: Drop Duplicate Rows
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def dropDuplicateEmails(customers: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// return customers.drop_duplicates(subset=['email'])
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2882: Drop Duplicate Rows
// Auto-generated Go example from py.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2882: Drop Duplicate Rows
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def dropDuplicateEmails(customers: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// return customers.drop_duplicates(subset=['email'])
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2882: Drop Duplicate Rows
import pandas as pd
def dropDuplicateEmails(customers: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
return customers.drop_duplicates(subset=['email'])
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2882: Drop Duplicate Rows
// Rust example auto-generated from py reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2882: Drop Duplicate Rows
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def dropDuplicateEmails(customers: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// return customers.drop_duplicates(subset=['email'])
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2882: Drop Duplicate Rows
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from py.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2882: Drop Duplicate Rows
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def dropDuplicateEmails(customers: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// return customers.drop_duplicates(subset=['email'])
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.