Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on core interview patterns fundamentals.
DataFrame students +-------------+--------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+--------+ | student_id | int | | name | object | | age | int | +-------------+--------+
There are some rows having missing values in the name column.
Write a solution to remove the rows with missing values.
The result format is in the following example.
Example 1:
Input: +------------+---------+-----+ | student_id | name | age | +------------+---------+-----+ | 32 | Piper | 5 | | 217 | None | 19 | | 779 | Georgia | 20 | | 849 | Willow | 14 | +------------+---------+-----+ Output: +------------+---------+-----+ | student_id | name | age | +------------+---------+-----+ | 32 | Piper | 5 | | 779 | Georgia | 20 | | 849 | Willow | 14 | +------------+---------+-----+ Explanation: Student with id 217 havs empty value in the name column, so it will be removed.
Problem summary: DataFrame students +-------------+--------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+--------+ | student_id | int | | name | object | | age | int | +-------------+--------+ There are some rows having missing values in the name column. Write a solution to remove the rows with missing values. The result format is in the following example.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
{"headers":{"students":["student_id","name","age"]},"rows":{"students":[[32,"Piper",5],[217,null,19],[779,"Georgia",20],[849,"Willow",14]]}}Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2883: Drop Missing Data
// Auto-generated Java example from py.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2883: Drop Missing Data
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def dropMissingData(students: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// return students[students['name'].notnull()]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2883: Drop Missing Data
// Auto-generated Go example from py.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2883: Drop Missing Data
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def dropMissingData(students: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// return students[students['name'].notnull()]
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2883: Drop Missing Data
import pandas as pd
def dropMissingData(students: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
return students[students['name'].notnull()]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2883: Drop Missing Data
// Rust example auto-generated from py reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2883: Drop Missing Data
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def dropMissingData(students: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// return students[students['name'].notnull()]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2883: Drop Missing Data
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from py.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2883: Drop Missing Data
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def dropMissingData(students: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// return students[students['name'].notnull()]
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.