Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on core interview patterns fundamentals.
DataFrame employees
+-------------+--------+
| Column Name | Type |
+-------------+--------+
| name | object |
| salary | int |
+-------------+--------+
A company intends to give its employees a pay rise.
Write a solution to modify the salary column by multiplying each salary by 2.
The result format is in the following example.
Example 1:
Input: DataFrame employees +---------+--------+ | name | salary | +---------+--------+ | Jack | 19666 | | Piper | 74754 | | Mia | 62509 | | Ulysses | 54866 | +---------+--------+ Output: +---------+--------+ | name | salary | +---------+--------+ | Jack | 39332 | | Piper | 149508 | | Mia | 125018 | | Ulysses | 109732 | +---------+--------+ Explanation: Every salary has been doubled.
Problem summary: DataFrame employees +-------------+--------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+--------+ | name | object | | salary | int | +-------------+--------+ A company intends to give its employees a pay rise. Write a solution to modify the salary column by multiplying each salary by 2. The result format is in the following example.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
{"headers":{"employees":["name","salary"]},"rows":{"employees":[["Jack",19666],["Piper",74754],["Mia",62509],["Ulysses",54866]]}}Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2884: Modify Columns
// Auto-generated Java example from py.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2884: Modify Columns
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def modifySalaryColumn(employees: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// employees['salary'] *= 2
// return employees
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2884: Modify Columns
// Auto-generated Go example from py.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2884: Modify Columns
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def modifySalaryColumn(employees: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// employees['salary'] *= 2
// return employees
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2884: Modify Columns
import pandas as pd
def modifySalaryColumn(employees: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
employees['salary'] *= 2
return employees
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2884: Modify Columns
// Rust example auto-generated from py reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2884: Modify Columns
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def modifySalaryColumn(employees: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// employees['salary'] *= 2
// return employees
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2884: Modify Columns
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from py.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2884: Modify Columns
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def modifySalaryColumn(employees: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// employees['salary'] *= 2
// return employees
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.