Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on core interview patterns fundamentals.
DataFrame students
+-------------+--------+
| Column Name | Type |
+-------------+--------+
| student_id | int |
| name | object |
| age | int |
| grade | float |
+-------------+--------+
Write a solution to correct the errors:
The grade column is stored as floats, convert it to integers.
The result format is in the following example.
Example 1: Input: DataFrame students: +------------+------+-----+-------+ | student_id | name | age | grade | +------------+------+-----+-------+ | 1 | Ava | 6 | 73.0 | | 2 | Kate | 15 | 87.0 | +------------+------+-----+-------+ Output: +------------+------+-----+-------+ | student_id | name | age | grade | +------------+------+-----+-------+ | 1 | Ava | 6 | 73 | | 2 | Kate | 15 | 87 | +------------+------+-----+-------+ Explanation: The data types of the column grade is converted to int.
Problem summary: DataFrame students +-------------+--------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+--------+ | student_id | int | | name | object | | age | int | | grade | float | +-------------+--------+ Write a solution to correct the errors: The grade column is stored as floats, convert it to integers. The result format is in the following example.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
{"headers":{"students":["student_id","name","age","grade"]},"rows":{"students":[[1,"Ava",6,73.0],[2,"Kate",15,87.0]]}}Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2886: Change Data Type
// Auto-generated Java example from py.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2886: Change Data Type
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def changeDatatype(students: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// students['grade'] = students['grade'].astype(int)
// return students
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2886: Change Data Type
// Auto-generated Go example from py.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2886: Change Data Type
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def changeDatatype(students: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// students['grade'] = students['grade'].astype(int)
// return students
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2886: Change Data Type
import pandas as pd
def changeDatatype(students: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
students['grade'] = students['grade'].astype(int)
return students
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2886: Change Data Type
// Rust example auto-generated from py reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2886: Change Data Type
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def changeDatatype(students: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// students['grade'] = students['grade'].astype(int)
// return students
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2886: Change Data Type
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from py.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2886: Change Data Type
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def changeDatatype(students: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// students['grade'] = students['grade'].astype(int)
// return students
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.