Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on core interview patterns fundamentals.
DataFrame animals
+-------------+--------+
| Column Name | Type |
+-------------+--------+
| name | object |
| species | object |
| age | int |
| weight | int |
+-------------+--------+
Write a solution to list the names of animals that weigh strictly more than 100 kilograms.
Return the animals sorted by weight in descending order.
The result format is in the following example.
Example 1:
Input: DataFrame animals: +----------+---------+-----+--------+ | name | species | age | weight | +----------+---------+-----+--------+ | Tatiana | Snake | 98 | 464 | | Khaled | Giraffe | 50 | 41 | | Alex | Leopard | 6 | 328 | | Jonathan | Monkey | 45 | 463 | | Stefan | Bear | 100 | 50 | | Tommy | Panda | 26 | 349 | +----------+---------+-----+--------+ Output: +----------+ | name | +----------+ | Tatiana | | Jonathan | | Tommy | | Alex | +----------+ Explanation: All animals weighing more than 100 should be included in the results table. Tatiana's weight is 464, Jonathan's weight is 463, Tommy's weight is 349, and Alex's weight is 328. The results should be sorted in descending order of weight.
In Pandas, method chaining enables us to perform operations on a DataFrame without breaking up each operation into a separate line or creating multiple temporary variables.
Can you complete this task in just one line of code using method chaining?
Problem summary: DataFrame animals +-------------+--------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+--------+ | name | object | | species | object | | age | int | | weight | int | +-------------+--------+ Write a solution to list the names of animals that weigh strictly more than 100 kilograms. Return the animals sorted by weight in descending order. The result format is in the following example.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
{"headers":{"animals":["name","species","age","weight"]},"rows":{"animals":[["Tatiana","Snake",98,464],["Khaled","Giraffe",50,41],["Alex","Leopard",6,328],["Jonathan","Monkey",45,463],["Stefan","Bear",100,50],["Tommy","Panda",26,349]]}}Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2891: Method Chaining
// Auto-generated Java example from py.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2891: Method Chaining
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def findHeavyAnimals(animals: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// return animals[animals['weight'] > 100].sort_values('weight', ascending=False)[
// ['name']
// ]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2891: Method Chaining
// Auto-generated Go example from py.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2891: Method Chaining
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def findHeavyAnimals(animals: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// return animals[animals['weight'] > 100].sort_values('weight', ascending=False)[
// ['name']
// ]
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2891: Method Chaining
import pandas as pd
def findHeavyAnimals(animals: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
return animals[animals['weight'] > 100].sort_values('weight', ascending=False)[
['name']
]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2891: Method Chaining
// Rust example auto-generated from py reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2891: Method Chaining
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def findHeavyAnimals(animals: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// return animals[animals['weight'] > 100].sort_values('weight', ascending=False)[
// ['name']
// ]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2891: Method Chaining
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from py.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #2891: Method Chaining
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def findHeavyAnimals(animals: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// return animals[animals['weight'] > 100].sort_values('weight', ascending=False)[
// ['name']
// ]
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.