Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
You are given a 0-indexed array nums of non-negative integers, and two integers l and r.
Return the count of sub-multisets within nums where the sum of elements in each subset falls within the inclusive range of [l, r].
Since the answer may be large, return it modulo 109 + 7.
A sub-multiset is an unordered collection of elements of the array in which a given value x can occur 0, 1, ..., occ[x] times, where occ[x] is the number of occurrences of x in the array.
Note that:
0.Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,2,3], l = 6, r = 6
Output: 1
Explanation: The only subset of nums that has a sum of 6 is {1, 2, 3}.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [2,1,4,2,7], l = 1, r = 5
Output: 7
Explanation: The subsets of nums that have a sum within the range [1, 5] are {1}, {2}, {4}, {2, 2}, {1, 2}, {1, 4}, and {1, 2, 2}.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [1,2,1,3,5,2], l = 3, r = 5
Output: 9
Explanation: The subsets of nums that have a sum within the range [3, 5] are {3}, {5}, {1, 2}, {1, 3}, {2, 2}, {2, 3}, {1, 1, 2}, {1, 1, 3}, and {1, 2, 2}.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 2 * 1040 <= nums[i] <= 2 * 104nums does not exceed 2 * 104.0 <= l <= r <= 2 * 104Problem summary: You are given a 0-indexed array nums of non-negative integers, and two integers l and r. Return the count of sub-multisets within nums where the sum of elements in each subset falls within the inclusive range of [l, r]. Since the answer may be large, return it modulo 109 + 7. A sub-multiset is an unordered collection of elements of the array in which a given value x can occur 0, 1, ..., occ[x] times, where occ[x] is the number of occurrences of x in the array. Note that: Two sub-multisets are the same if sorting both sub-multisets results in identical multisets. The sum of an empty multiset is 0.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Hash Map · Dynamic Programming · Sliding Window
[1,2,2,3] 6 6
[2,1,4,2,7] 1 5
[1,2,1,3,5,2] 3 5
coin-change)coin-change-ii)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2902: Count of Sub-Multisets With Bounded Sum
class Solution {
static final int MOD = 1_000_000_007;
public int countSubMultisets(List<Integer> nums, int l, int r) {
Map<Integer, Integer> count = new HashMap<>();
int total = 0;
for (int num : nums) {
total += num;
if (num <= r) {
count.merge(num, 1, Integer::sum);
}
}
if (total < l) {
return 0;
}
r = Math.min(r, total);
int[] dp = new int[r + 1];
dp[0] = count.getOrDefault(0, 0) + 1;
count.remove(Integer.valueOf(0));
int sum = 0;
for (Map.Entry<Integer, Integer> e : count.entrySet()) {
int num = e.getKey();
int c = e.getValue();
sum = Math.min(sum + c * num, r);
// prefix part
// dp[i] = dp[i] + dp[i - num] + ... + dp[i - c*num] + dp[i-(c+1)*num] + ... + dp[i %
// num]
for (int i = num; i <= sum; i++) {
dp[i] = (dp[i] + dp[i - num]) % MOD;
}
int temp = (c + 1) * num;
// correction part
// subtract dp[i - (freq + 1) * num] to the end part.
// leves dp[i] = dp[i] + dp[i-num] +...+ dp[i - c*num];
for (int i = sum; i >= temp; i--) {
dp[i] = (dp[i] - dp[i - temp] + MOD) % MOD;
}
}
int ans = 0;
for (int i = l; i <= r; i++) {
ans += dp[i];
ans %= MOD;
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2902: Count of Sub-Multisets With Bounded Sum
func countSubMultisets(nums []int, l int, r int) int {
multiset := make(map[int]int)
for _, num := range nums {
multiset[num]++
}
mem := make([]int, r+1)
mem[0] = 1
prefix := make([]int, len(mem))
for num, occ := range multiset {
copy(prefix, mem)
for sum := num; sum <= r; sum++ {
prefix[sum] = (prefix[sum] + prefix[sum-num]) % mod
}
for sum := r; sum >= 0; sum-- {
if num > 0 {
mem[sum] = prefix[sum]
if sum >= num*(occ+1) {
mem[sum] = (mem[sum] - prefix[sum-num*(occ+1)] + mod) % mod
}
} else {
mem[sum] = (mem[sum] * (occ + 1)) % mod
}
}
}
var result int
for sum := l; sum <= r; sum++ {
result = (result + mem[sum]) % mod
}
return result
}
var mod int = 1e9 + 7
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #2902: Count of Sub-Multisets With Bounded Sum
class Solution:
def countSubMultisets(self, nums: List[int], l: int, r: int) -> int:
kMod = 1_000_000_007
# dp[i] := # of submultisets of nums with sum i
dp = [1] + [0] * r
count = collections.Counter(nums)
zeros = count.pop(0, 0)
for num, freq in count.items():
# stride[i] := dp[i] + dp[i - num] + dp[i - 2 * num] + ...
stride = dp.copy()
for i in range(num, r + 1):
stride[i] += stride[i - num]
for i in range(r, 0, -1):
if i >= num * (freq + 1):
# dp[i] + dp[i - num] + dp[i - freq * num]
dp[i] = stride[i] - stride[i - num * (freq + 1)]
else:
dp[i] = stride[i]
return (zeros + 1) * sum(dp[l : r + 1]) % kMod
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2902: Count of Sub-Multisets With Bounded Sum
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #2902: Count of Sub-Multisets With Bounded Sum
// class Solution {
// static final int MOD = 1_000_000_007;
// public int countSubMultisets(List<Integer> nums, int l, int r) {
// Map<Integer, Integer> count = new HashMap<>();
// int total = 0;
// for (int num : nums) {
// total += num;
// if (num <= r) {
// count.merge(num, 1, Integer::sum);
// }
// }
// if (total < l) {
// return 0;
// }
// r = Math.min(r, total);
// int[] dp = new int[r + 1];
// dp[0] = count.getOrDefault(0, 0) + 1;
// count.remove(Integer.valueOf(0));
// int sum = 0;
// for (Map.Entry<Integer, Integer> e : count.entrySet()) {
// int num = e.getKey();
// int c = e.getValue();
// sum = Math.min(sum + c * num, r);
// // prefix part
// // dp[i] = dp[i] + dp[i - num] + ... + dp[i - c*num] + dp[i-(c+1)*num] + ... + dp[i %
// // num]
// for (int i = num; i <= sum; i++) {
// dp[i] = (dp[i] + dp[i - num]) % MOD;
// }
// int temp = (c + 1) * num;
// // correction part
// // subtract dp[i - (freq + 1) * num] to the end part.
// // leves dp[i] = dp[i] + dp[i-num] +...+ dp[i - c*num];
// for (int i = sum; i >= temp; i--) {
// dp[i] = (dp[i] - dp[i - temp] + MOD) % MOD;
// }
// }
// int ans = 0;
// for (int i = l; i <= r; i++) {
// ans += dp[i];
// ans %= MOD;
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #2902: Count of Sub-Multisets With Bounded Sum
function countSubMultisets(nums: number[], l: number, r: number): number {
const cnt: number[] = Array(20001).fill(0);
const memo: number[] = Array(20001).fill(0);
const mod: number = 1000000007;
for (const n of nums) {
cnt[n]++;
}
memo.fill(1, 0, cnt[1] + 1);
let total: number = cnt[1];
for (let n = 2; n <= r; ++n) {
if (!cnt[n]) {
continue;
}
const top: number = (cnt[n] + 1) * n;
total += n * cnt[n];
for (let i = n, ii = Math.min(total, r); i <= ii; ++i) {
memo[i] = (memo[i] + memo[i - n]) % mod;
}
for (let i = Math.min(total, r); i >= top; --i) {
memo[i] = (mod + memo[i] - memo[i - top]) % mod;
}
}
let result: number = 0;
for (let i = l; i <= r; i++) {
result = (result + memo[i]) % mod;
}
return (result * (cnt[0] + 1)) % mod;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.
Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: Zero-count keys stay in map and break distinct/count constraints.
Usually fails on: Window/map size checks are consistently off by one.
Fix: Delete keys when count reaches zero.
Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.
Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.
Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.
Wrong move: Using `if` instead of `while` leaves the window invalid for multiple iterations.
Usually fails on: Over-limit windows stay invalid and produce wrong lengths/counts.
Fix: Shrink in a `while` loop until the invariant is valid again.