Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
Given an integer array nums, handle multiple queries of the following type:
nums between indices left and right inclusive where left <= right.Implement the NumArray class:
NumArray(int[] nums) Initializes the object with the integer array nums.int sumRange(int left, int right) Returns the sum of the elements of nums between indices left and right inclusive (i.e. nums[left] + nums[left + 1] + ... + nums[right]).Example 1:
Input ["NumArray", "sumRange", "sumRange", "sumRange"] [[[-2, 0, 3, -5, 2, -1]], [0, 2], [2, 5], [0, 5]] Output [null, 1, -1, -3] Explanation NumArray numArray = new NumArray([-2, 0, 3, -5, 2, -1]); numArray.sumRange(0, 2); // return (-2) + 0 + 3 = 1 numArray.sumRange(2, 5); // return 3 + (-5) + 2 + (-1) = -1 numArray.sumRange(0, 5); // return (-2) + 0 + 3 + (-5) + 2 + (-1) = -3
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 104-105 <= nums[i] <= 1050 <= left <= right < nums.length104 calls will be made to sumRange.Problem summary: Given an integer array nums, handle multiple queries of the following type: Calculate the sum of the elements of nums between indices left and right inclusive where left <= right. Implement the NumArray class: NumArray(int[] nums) Initializes the object with the integer array nums. int sumRange(int left, int right) Returns the sum of the elements of nums between indices left and right inclusive (i.e. nums[left] + nums[left + 1] + ... + nums[right]).
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Design
["NumArray","sumRange","sumRange","sumRange"] [[[-2,0,3,-5,2,-1]],[0,2],[2,5],[0,5]]
range-sum-query-2d-immutable)range-sum-query-mutable)maximum-size-subarray-sum-equals-k)sum-of-variable-length-subarrays)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #303: Range Sum Query - Immutable
class NumArray {
private int[] s;
public NumArray(int[] nums) {
int n = nums.length;
s = new int[n + 1];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
s[i + 1] = s[i] + nums[i];
}
}
public int sumRange(int left, int right) {
return s[right + 1] - s[left];
}
}
/**
* Your NumArray object will be instantiated and called as such:
* NumArray obj = new NumArray(nums);
* int param_1 = obj.sumRange(left,right);
*/
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #303: Range Sum Query - Immutable
type NumArray struct {
s []int
}
func Constructor(nums []int) NumArray {
n := len(nums)
s := make([]int, n+1)
for i, v := range nums {
s[i+1] = s[i] + v
}
return NumArray{s}
}
func (this *NumArray) SumRange(left int, right int) int {
return this.s[right+1] - this.s[left]
}
/**
* Your NumArray object will be instantiated and called as such:
* obj := Constructor(nums);
* param_1 := obj.SumRange(left,right);
*/
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #303: Range Sum Query - Immutable
class NumArray:
def __init__(self, nums: List[int]):
self.s = list(accumulate(nums, initial=0))
def sumRange(self, left: int, right: int) -> int:
return self.s[right + 1] - self.s[left]
# Your NumArray object will be instantiated and called as such:
# obj = NumArray(nums)
# param_1 = obj.sumRange(left,right)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #303: Range Sum Query - Immutable
struct NumArray {
s: Vec<i32>,
}
/**
* `&self` means the method takes an immutable reference.
* If you need a mutable reference, change it to `&mut self` instead.
*/
impl NumArray {
fn new(mut nums: Vec<i32>) -> Self {
let n = nums.len();
let mut s = vec![0; n + 1];
for i in 0..n {
s[i + 1] = s[i] + nums[i];
}
Self { s }
}
fn sum_range(&self, left: i32, right: i32) -> i32 {
self.s[(right + 1) as usize] - self.s[left as usize]
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #303: Range Sum Query - Immutable
class NumArray {
private s: number[];
constructor(nums: number[]) {
const n = nums.length;
this.s = Array(n + 1).fill(0);
for (let i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
this.s[i + 1] = this.s[i] + nums[i];
}
}
sumRange(left: number, right: number): number {
return this.s[right + 1] - this.s[left];
}
}
/**
* Your NumArray object will be instantiated and called as such:
* var obj = new NumArray(nums)
* var param_1 = obj.sumRange(left,right)
*/
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Use a simple list or array for storage. Each operation (get, put, remove) requires a linear scan to find the target element — O(n) per operation. Space is O(n) to store the data. The linear search makes this impractical for frequent operations.
Design problems target O(1) amortized per operation by combining data structures (hash map + doubly-linked list for LRU, stack + min-tracking for MinStack). Space is always at least O(n) to store the data. The challenge is achieving constant-time operations through clever structure composition.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.