Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.
You are given an array of integers nums. Consider the following operation:
nums and define the score of the operation as the sum of these two elements.You can perform this operation until nums contains fewer than two elements. Additionally, the same score must be achieved in all operations.
Return the maximum number of operations you can perform.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [3,2,1,4,5]
Output: 2
Explanation:
3 + 2 = 5. After this operation, nums = [1,4,5].4 + 1 = 5, the same as the previous operation. After this operation, nums = [5].Example 2:
Input: nums = [1,5,3,3,4,1,3,2,2,3]
Output: 2
Explanation:
1 + 5 = 6. After this operation, nums = [3,3,4,1,3,2,2,3].3 + 3 = 6, the same as the previous operation. After this operation, nums = [4,1,3,2,2,3].4 + 1 = 5, which is different from the previous scores.Example 3:
Input: nums = [5,3]
Output: 1
Constraints:
2 <= nums.length <= 1001 <= nums[i] <= 1000Problem summary: You are given an array of integers nums. Consider the following operation: Delete the first two elements nums and define the score of the operation as the sum of these two elements. You can perform this operation until nums contains fewer than two elements. Additionally, the same score must be achieved in all operations. Return the maximum number of operations you can perform.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[3,2,1,4,5]
[1,5,3,3,4,1,3,2,2,3]
[5,3]
Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3038: Maximum Number of Operations With the Same Score I
class Solution {
public int maxOperations(int[] nums) {
int s = nums[0] + nums[1];
int ans = 0, n = nums.length;
for (int i = 0; i + 1 < n && nums[i] + nums[i + 1] == s; i += 2) {
++ans;
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3038: Maximum Number of Operations With the Same Score I
func maxOperations(nums []int) (ans int) {
s, n := nums[0]+nums[1], len(nums)
for i := 0; i+1 < n && nums[i]+nums[i+1] == s; i += 2 {
ans++
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3038: Maximum Number of Operations With the Same Score I
class Solution:
def maxOperations(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
s = nums[0] + nums[1]
ans, n = 0, len(nums)
for i in range(0, n, 2):
if i + 1 == n or nums[i] + nums[i + 1] != s:
break
ans += 1
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3038: Maximum Number of Operations With the Same Score I
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3038: Maximum Number of Operations With the Same Score I
// class Solution {
// public int maxOperations(int[] nums) {
// int s = nums[0] + nums[1];
// int ans = 0, n = nums.length;
// for (int i = 0; i + 1 < n && nums[i] + nums[i + 1] == s; i += 2) {
// ++ans;
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3038: Maximum Number of Operations With the Same Score I
function maxOperations(nums: number[]): number {
const s = nums[0] + nums[1];
const n = nums.length;
let ans = 0;
for (let i = 0; i + 1 < n && nums[i] + nums[i + 1] === s; i += 2) {
++ans;
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.