LeetCode #3038 — EASY

Maximum Number of Operations With the Same Score I

Build confidence with an intuition-first walkthrough focused on array fundamentals.

Solve on LeetCode
The Problem

Problem Statement

You are given an array of integers nums. Consider the following operation:

  • Delete the first two elements nums and define the score of the operation as the sum of these two elements.

You can perform this operation until nums contains fewer than two elements. Additionally, the same score must be achieved in all operations.

Return the maximum number of operations you can perform.

Example 1:

Input: nums = [3,2,1,4,5]

Output: 2

Explanation:

  • We can perform the first operation with the score 3 + 2 = 5. After this operation, nums = [1,4,5].
  • We can perform the second operation as its score is 4 + 1 = 5, the same as the previous operation. After this operation, nums = [5].
  • As there are fewer than two elements, we can't perform more operations.

Example 2:

Input: nums = [1,5,3,3,4,1,3,2,2,3]

Output: 2

Explanation:

  • We can perform the first operation with the score 1 + 5 = 6. After this operation, nums = [3,3,4,1,3,2,2,3].
  • We can perform the second operation as its score is 3 + 3 = 6, the same as the previous operation. After this operation, nums = [4,1,3,2,2,3].
  • We cannot perform the next operation as its score is 4 + 1 = 5, which is different from the previous scores.

Example 3:

Input: nums = [5,3]

Output: 1

Constraints:

  • 2 <= nums.length <= 100
  • 1 <= nums[i] <= 1000

Roadmap

  1. Brute Force Baseline
  2. Core Insight
  3. Algorithm Walkthrough
  4. Edge Cases
  5. Full Annotated Code
  6. Interactive Study Demo
  7. Complexity Analysis
Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: You are given an array of integers nums. Consider the following operation: Delete the first two elements nums and define the score of the operation as the sum of these two elements. You can perform this operation until nums contains fewer than two elements. Additionally, the same score must be achieved in all operations. Return the maximum number of operations you can perform.

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Array

Example 1

[3,2,1,4,5]

Example 2

[1,5,3,3,4,1,3,2,2,3]

Example 3

[5,3]
Step 02

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

  • No official hints in dataset. Start from constraints and look for a monotonic or reusable state.
Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.
Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

  1. Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
  2. Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
  3. Record answer candidate when condition is met.
  4. Continue until all input is consumed.
Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.
Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input
Single element / shortest valid input
Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.
Duplicates & Repeats
Repeated values / repeated states
Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.
Extreme Constraints
Upper-end input sizes
Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.
Invalid / Corner Shape
Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures
Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.
Step 05

Full Annotated Code

Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3038: Maximum Number of Operations With the Same Score I
class Solution {
    public int maxOperations(int[] nums) {
        int s = nums[0] + nums[1];
        int ans = 0, n = nums.length;
        for (int i = 0; i + 1 < n && nums[i] + nums[i + 1] == s; i += 2) {
            ++ans;
        }
        return ans;
    }
}
Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Press Step or Run All to begin.
Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time
O(n)
Space
O(1)

Approach Breakdown

BRUTE FORCE
O(n²) time
O(1) space

Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.

OPTIMIZED
O(n) time
O(1) space

Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.

Shortcut: If you are using nested loops on an array, there is almost always an O(n) solution. Look for the right auxiliary state.
Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

Off-by-one on range boundaries

Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.

Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.

Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.