Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums, and an integer k.
You are allowed to perform some operations on nums, where in a single operation, you can:
x and y from nums.x and y from nums.(min(x, y) * 2 + max(x, y)) at any position in the array.Note that you can only apply the described operation if nums contains at least two elements.
Return the minimum number of operations needed so that all elements of the array are greater than or equal to k.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [2,11,10,1,3], k = 10
Output: 2
Explanation:
1 * 2 + 2 to nums. nums becomes equal to [4, 11, 10, 3].3 * 2 + 4 to nums. nums becomes equal to [10, 11, 10].At this stage, all the elements of nums are greater than or equal to 10 so we can stop.
It can be shown that 2 is the minimum number of operations needed so that all elements of the array are greater than or equal to 10.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [1,1,2,4,9], k = 20
Output: 4
Explanation:
nums becomes equal to [2, 4, 9, 3]. nums becomes equal to [7, 4, 9]. nums becomes equal to [15, 9]. nums becomes equal to [33].At this stage, all the elements of nums are greater than 20 so we can stop.
It can be shown that 4 is the minimum number of operations needed so that all elements of the array are greater than or equal to 20.
Constraints:
2 <= nums.length <= 2 * 1051 <= nums[i] <= 1091 <= k <= 109k.Problem summary: You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums, and an integer k. You are allowed to perform some operations on nums, where in a single operation, you can: Select the two smallest integers x and y from nums. Remove x and y from nums. Insert (min(x, y) * 2 + max(x, y)) at any position in the array. Note that you can only apply the described operation if nums contains at least two elements. Return the minimum number of operations needed so that all elements of the array are greater than or equal to k.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[2,11,10,1,3] 10
[1,1,2,4,9] 20
minimum-operations-to-halve-array-sum)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3066: Minimum Operations to Exceed Threshold Value II
class Solution {
public int minOperations(int[] nums, int k) {
PriorityQueue<Long> pq = new PriorityQueue<>();
for (int x : nums) {
pq.offer((long) x);
}
int ans = 0;
for (; pq.size() > 1 && pq.peek() < k; ++ans) {
long x = pq.poll(), y = pq.poll();
pq.offer(x * 2 + y);
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3066: Minimum Operations to Exceed Threshold Value II
func minOperations(nums []int, k int) (ans int) {
pq := &hp{nums}
heap.Init(pq)
for ; pq.Len() > 1 && pq.IntSlice[0] < k; ans++ {
x, y := heap.Pop(pq).(int), heap.Pop(pq).(int)
heap.Push(pq, x*2+y)
}
return
}
type hp struct{ sort.IntSlice }
func (h *hp) Less(i, j int) bool { return h.IntSlice[i] < h.IntSlice[j] }
func (h *hp) Pop() interface{} {
old := h.IntSlice
n := len(old)
x := old[n-1]
h.IntSlice = old[0 : n-1]
return x
}
func (h *hp) Push(x interface{}) {
h.IntSlice = append(h.IntSlice, x.(int))
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3066: Minimum Operations to Exceed Threshold Value II
class Solution:
def minOperations(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> int:
heapify(nums)
ans = 0
while len(nums) > 1 and nums[0] < k:
x, y = heappop(nums), heappop(nums)
heappush(nums, x * 2 + y)
ans += 1
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3066: Minimum Operations to Exceed Threshold Value II
use std::collections::BinaryHeap;
impl Solution {
pub fn min_operations(nums: Vec<i32>, k: i32) -> i32 {
let mut pq = BinaryHeap::new();
for &x in &nums {
pq.push(-(x as i64));
}
let mut ans = 0;
while pq.len() > 1 && -pq.peek().unwrap() < k as i64 {
let x = -pq.pop().unwrap();
let y = -pq.pop().unwrap();
pq.push(-(x * 2 + y));
ans += 1;
}
ans
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3066: Minimum Operations to Exceed Threshold Value II
function minOperations(nums: number[], k: number): number {
const pq = new MinPriorityQueue<number>();
for (const x of nums) {
pq.enqueue(x);
}
let ans = 0;
for (; pq.size() > 1 && pq.front() < k; ++ans) {
const x = pq.dequeue();
const y = pq.dequeue();
pq.enqueue(x * 2 + y);
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.