Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using core interview patterns strategy.
Given a string word, compress it using the following algorithm:
comp. While word is not empty, use the following operation:
word made of a single character c repeating at most 9 times.c to comp.Return the string comp.
Example 1:
Input: word = "abcde"
Output: "1a1b1c1d1e"
Explanation:
Initially, comp = "". Apply the operation 5 times, choosing "a", "b", "c", "d", and "e" as the prefix in each operation.
For each prefix, append "1" followed by the character to comp.
Example 2:
Input: word = "aaaaaaaaaaaaaabb"
Output: "9a5a2b"
Explanation:
Initially, comp = "". Apply the operation 3 times, choosing "aaaaaaaaa", "aaaaa", and "bb" as the prefix in each operation.
"aaaaaaaaa", append "9" followed by "a" to comp."aaaaa", append "5" followed by "a" to comp."bb", append "2" followed by "b" to comp.Constraints:
1 <= word.length <= 2 * 105word consists only of lowercase English letters.Problem summary: Given a string word, compress it using the following algorithm: Begin with an empty string comp. While word is not empty, use the following operation: Remove a maximum length prefix of word made of a single character c repeating at most 9 times. Append the length of the prefix followed by c to comp. Return the string comp.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
"abcde"
"aaaaaaaaaaaaaabb"
string-compression)string-compression-ii)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3163: String Compression III
class Solution {
public String compressedString(String word) {
StringBuilder ans = new StringBuilder();
int n = word.length();
for (int i = 0; i < n;) {
int j = i + 1;
while (j < n && word.charAt(j) == word.charAt(i)) {
++j;
}
int k = j - i;
while (k > 0) {
int x = Math.min(9, k);
ans.append(x).append(word.charAt(i));
k -= x;
}
i = j;
}
return ans.toString();
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3163: String Compression III
func compressedString(word string) string {
ans := []byte{}
n := len(word)
for i := 0; i < n; {
j := i + 1
for j < n && word[j] == word[i] {
j++
}
k := j - i
for k > 0 {
x := min(9, k)
ans = append(ans, byte('0'+x))
ans = append(ans, word[i])
k -= x
}
i = j
}
return string(ans)
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3163: String Compression III
class Solution:
def compressedString(self, word: str) -> str:
g = groupby(word)
ans = []
for c, v in g:
k = len(list(v))
while k:
x = min(9, k)
ans.append(str(x) + c)
k -= x
return "".join(ans)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3163: String Compression III
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3163: String Compression III
// class Solution {
// public String compressedString(String word) {
// StringBuilder ans = new StringBuilder();
// int n = word.length();
// for (int i = 0; i < n;) {
// int j = i + 1;
// while (j < n && word.charAt(j) == word.charAt(i)) {
// ++j;
// }
// int k = j - i;
// while (k > 0) {
// int x = Math.min(9, k);
// ans.append(x).append(word.charAt(i));
// k -= x;
// }
// i = j;
// }
// return ans.toString();
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3163: String Compression III
function compressedString(word: string): string {
const ans: string[] = [];
const n = word.length;
for (let i = 0; i < n; ) {
let j = i + 1;
while (j < n && word[j] === word[i]) {
++j;
}
let k = j - i;
while (k) {
const x = Math.min(k, 9);
ans.push(x + word[i]);
k -= x;
}
i = j;
}
return ans.join('');
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.