Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Break down a hard problem into reliable checkpoints, edge-case handling, and complexity trade-offs.
You are given an integer n and a 2D array requirements, where requirements[i] = [endi, cnti] represents the end index and the inversion count of each requirement.
A pair of indices (i, j) from an integer array nums is called an inversion if:
i < j and nums[i] > nums[j]Return the number of permutations perm of [0, 1, 2, ..., n - 1] such that for all requirements[i], perm[0..endi] has exactly cnti inversions.
Since the answer may be very large, return it modulo 109 + 7.
Example 1:
Input: n = 3, requirements = [[2,2],[0,0]]
Output: 2
Explanation:
The two permutations are:
[2, 0, 1]
[2, 0, 1] has inversions (0, 1) and (0, 2).[2] has 0 inversions.[1, 2, 0]
[1, 2, 0] has inversions (0, 2) and (1, 2).[1] has 0 inversions.Example 2:
Input: n = 3, requirements = [[2,2],[1,1],[0,0]]
Output: 1
Explanation:
The only satisfying permutation is [2, 0, 1]:
[2, 0, 1] has inversions (0, 1) and (0, 2).[2, 0] has an inversion (0, 1).[2] has 0 inversions.Example 3:
Input: n = 2, requirements = [[0,0],[1,0]]
Output: 1
Explanation:
The only satisfying permutation is [0, 1]:
[0] has 0 inversions.[0, 1] has no inversions.Constraints:
2 <= n <= 3001 <= requirements.length <= nrequirements[i] = [endi, cnti]0 <= endi <= n - 10 <= cnti <= 400i such that endi == n - 1.endi are unique.Problem summary: You are given an integer n and a 2D array requirements, where requirements[i] = [endi, cnti] represents the end index and the inversion count of each requirement. A pair of indices (i, j) from an integer array nums is called an inversion if: i < j and nums[i] > nums[j] Return the number of permutations perm of [0, 1, 2, ..., n - 1] such that for all requirements[i], perm[0..endi] has exactly cnti inversions. Since the answer may be very large, return it modulo 109 + 7.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array · Dynamic Programming
3 [[2,2],[0,0]]
3 [[2,2],[1,1],[0,0]]
2 [[0,0],[1,0]]
k-inverse-pairs-array)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3193: Count the Number of Inversions
class Solution {
public int numberOfPermutations(int n, int[][] requirements) {
int[] req = new int[n];
Arrays.fill(req, -1);
int m = 0;
for (var r : requirements) {
req[r[0]] = r[1];
m = Math.max(m, r[1]);
}
if (req[0] > 0) {
return 0;
}
req[0] = 0;
final int mod = (int) 1e9 + 7;
int[][] f = new int[n][m + 1];
f[0][0] = 1;
for (int i = 1; i < n; ++i) {
int l = 0, r = m;
if (req[i] >= 0) {
l = r = req[i];
}
for (int j = l; j <= r; ++j) {
for (int k = 0; k <= Math.min(i, j); ++k) {
f[i][j] = (f[i][j] + f[i - 1][j - k]) % mod;
}
}
}
return f[n - 1][req[n - 1]];
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3193: Count the Number of Inversions
func numberOfPermutations(n int, requirements [][]int) int {
req := make([]int, n)
for i := range req {
req[i] = -1
}
for _, r := range requirements {
req[r[0]] = r[1]
}
if req[0] > 0 {
return 0
}
req[0] = 0
m := slices.Max(req)
const mod = int(1e9 + 7)
f := make([][]int, n)
for i := range f {
f[i] = make([]int, m+1)
}
f[0][0] = 1
for i := 1; i < n; i++ {
l, r := 0, m
if req[i] >= 0 {
l, r = req[i], req[i]
}
for j := l; j <= r; j++ {
for k := 0; k <= min(i, j); k++ {
f[i][j] = (f[i][j] + f[i-1][j-k]) % mod
}
}
}
return f[n-1][req[n-1]]
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3193: Count the Number of Inversions
class Solution:
def numberOfPermutations(self, n: int, requirements: List[List[int]]) -> int:
req = [-1] * n
for end, cnt in requirements:
req[end] = cnt
if req[0] > 0:
return 0
req[0] = 0
mod = 10**9 + 7
m = max(req)
f = [[0] * (m + 1) for _ in range(n)]
f[0][0] = 1
for i in range(1, n):
l, r = 0, m
if req[i] >= 0:
l = r = req[i]
for j in range(l, r + 1):
for k in range(min(i, j) + 1):
f[i][j] = (f[i][j] + f[i - 1][j - k]) % mod
return f[n - 1][req[n - 1]]
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3193: Count the Number of Inversions
/**
* [3193] Count the Number of Inversions
*/
pub struct Solution {}
// submission codes start here
use std::collections::HashMap;
const MOD: i32 = 1_000_000_007;
impl Solution {
pub fn number_of_permutations(n: i32, requirements: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> i32 {
let n = n as usize;
let mut requirements_map = HashMap::new();
let mut max_pair_count = 0;
requirements_map.insert(0, 0);
for requirement in requirements {
requirements_map.insert(requirement[0] as usize, requirement[1] as usize);
max_pair_count = max_pair_count.max(requirement[1]);
}
if let Some(count) = requirements_map.get(&0) {
if *count != 0 {
return 0;
}
}
let mut dp = vec![vec![-1; max_pair_count as usize + 1]; n];
if let Some(&count) = requirements_map.get(&(n - 1)) {
Self::dfs(n - 1, count, &requirements_map, &mut dp)
} else {
Self::dfs(n - 1, 0, &requirements_map, &mut dp)
}
}
fn dfs(
end: usize,
count: usize,
requirements: &HashMap<usize, usize>,
dp: &mut Vec<Vec<i32>>,
) -> i32 {
if end == 0 {
return 1;
}
if dp[end][count] != -1 {
return dp[end][count];
}
if let Some(&c) = requirements.get(&(end - 1)) {
if c <= count && count <= end + c {
let r = Self::dfs(end - 1, c, requirements, dp);
dp[end][count] = r;
r
} else {
dp[end][count] = 0;
0
}
} else {
let mut r = 0;
for i in 0..=end.min(count) {
r = (r + Self::dfs(end - 1, count - i, requirements, dp)) % MOD;
}
dp[end][count] = r;
r
}
}
}
// submission codes end
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_3193() {
assert_eq!(1, Solution::number_of_permutations(2, vec![vec![1, 1]]));
assert_eq!(
2,
Solution::number_of_permutations(3, vec![vec![2, 2], vec![0, 0]])
);
assert_eq!(
1,
Solution::number_of_permutations(3, vec![vec![2, 2], vec![1, 1], vec![0, 0]])
);
assert_eq!(
1,
Solution::number_of_permutations(2, vec![vec![0, 0], vec![1, 0]])
);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3193: Count the Number of Inversions
function numberOfPermutations(n: number, requirements: number[][]): number {
const req: number[] = Array(n).fill(-1);
for (const [end, cnt] of requirements) {
req[end] = cnt;
}
if (req[0] > 0) {
return 0;
}
req[0] = 0;
const m = Math.max(...req);
const mod = 1e9 + 7;
const f = Array.from({ length: n }, () => Array(m + 1).fill(0));
f[0][0] = 1;
for (let i = 1; i < n; ++i) {
let [l, r] = [0, m];
if (req[i] >= 0) {
l = r = req[i];
}
for (let j = l; j <= r; ++j) {
for (let k = 0; k <= Math.min(i, j); ++k) {
f[i][j] = (f[i][j] + f[i - 1][j - k]) % mod;
}
}
}
return f[n - 1][req[n - 1]];
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Pure recursion explores every possible choice at each step. With two choices per state (take or skip), the decision tree has 2ⁿ leaves. The recursion stack uses O(n) space. Many subproblems are recomputed exponentially many times.
Each cell in the DP table is computed exactly once from previously solved subproblems. The table dimensions determine both time and space. Look for the state variables — each unique combination of state values is one cell. Often a rolling array can reduce space by one dimension.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Wrong move: An incomplete state merges distinct subproblems and caches incorrect answers.
Usually fails on: Correctness breaks on cases that differ only in hidden state.
Fix: Define state so each unique subproblem maps to one DP cell.