Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.
You are given a 2D binary array grid. Find a rectangle with horizontal and vertical sides with the smallest area, such that all the 1's in grid lie inside this rectangle.
Return the minimum possible area of the rectangle.
Example 1:
Input: grid = [[0,1,0],[1,0,1]]
Output: 6
Explanation:
The smallest rectangle has a height of 2 and a width of 3, so it has an area of 2 * 3 = 6.
Example 2:
Input: grid = [[1,0],[0,0]]
Output: 1
Explanation:
The smallest rectangle has both height and width 1, so its area is 1 * 1 = 1.
Constraints:
1 <= grid.length, grid[i].length <= 1000grid[i][j] is either 0 or 1.grid.Problem summary: You are given a 2D binary array grid. Find a rectangle with horizontal and vertical sides with the smallest area, such that all the 1's in grid lie inside this rectangle. Return the minimum possible area of the rectangle.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: Array
[[0,1,0],[1,0,1]]
[[0,0],[1,0]]
smallest-rectangle-enclosing-black-pixels)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3195: Find the Minimum Area to Cover All Ones I
class Solution {
public int minimumArea(int[][] grid) {
int m = grid.length, n = grid[0].length;
int x1 = m, y1 = n;
int x2 = 0, y2 = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
if (grid[i][j] == 1) {
x1 = Math.min(x1, i);
y1 = Math.min(y1, j);
x2 = Math.max(x2, i);
y2 = Math.max(y2, j);
}
}
}
return (x2 - x1 + 1) * (y2 - y1 + 1);
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3195: Find the Minimum Area to Cover All Ones I
func minimumArea(grid [][]int) int {
x1, y1 := len(grid), len(grid[0])
x2, y2 := 0, 0
for i, row := range grid {
for j, x := range row {
if x == 1 {
x1, y1 = min(x1, i), min(y1, j)
x2, y2 = max(x2, i), max(y2, j)
}
}
}
return (x2 - x1 + 1) * (y2 - y1 + 1)
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3195: Find the Minimum Area to Cover All Ones I
class Solution:
def minimumArea(self, grid: List[List[int]]) -> int:
x1 = y1 = inf
x2 = y2 = -inf
for i, row in enumerate(grid):
for j, x in enumerate(row):
if x == 1:
x1 = min(x1, i)
y1 = min(y1, j)
x2 = max(x2, i)
y2 = max(y2, j)
return (x2 - x1 + 1) * (y2 - y1 + 1)
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3195: Find the Minimum Area to Cover All Ones I
impl Solution {
pub fn minimum_area(grid: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> i32 {
let m = grid.len();
let n = grid[0].len();
let mut x1 = m as i32;
let mut y1 = n as i32;
let mut x2 = 0i32;
let mut y2 = 0i32;
for i in 0..m {
for j in 0..n {
if grid[i][j] == 1 {
x1 = x1.min(i as i32);
y1 = y1.min(j as i32);
x2 = x2.max(i as i32);
y2 = y2.max(j as i32);
}
}
}
(x2 - x1 + 1) * (y2 - y1 + 1)
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3195: Find the Minimum Area to Cover All Ones I
function minimumArea(grid: number[][]): number {
const [m, n] = [grid.length, grid[0].length];
let [x1, y1] = [m, n];
let [x2, y2] = [0, 0];
for (let i = 0; i < m; ++i) {
for (let j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
if (grid[i][j] === 1) {
x1 = Math.min(x1, i);
y1 = Math.min(y1, j);
x2 = Math.max(x2, i);
y2 = Math.max(y2, j);
}
}
}
return (x2 - x1 + 1) * (y2 - y1 + 1);
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.