Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using core interview patterns strategy.
Table: transactions
+------------------+------+ | Column Name | Type | +------------------+------+ | transaction_id | int | | amount | int | | transaction_date | date | +------------------+------+ The transactions_id column uniquely identifies each row in this table. Each row of this table contains the transaction id, amount and transaction date.
Write a solution to find the sum of amounts for odd and even transactions for each day. If there are no odd or even transactions for a specific date, display as 0.
Return the result table ordered by transaction_date in ascending order.
The result format is in the following example.
Example:
Input:
transactions table:
+----------------+--------+------------------+ | transaction_id | amount | transaction_date | +----------------+--------+------------------+ | 1 | 150 | 2024-07-01 | | 2 | 200 | 2024-07-01 | | 3 | 75 | 2024-07-01 | | 4 | 300 | 2024-07-02 | | 5 | 50 | 2024-07-02 | | 6 | 120 | 2024-07-03 | +----------------+--------+------------------+
Output:
+------------------+---------+----------+ | transaction_date | odd_sum | even_sum | +------------------+---------+----------+ | 2024-07-01 | 75 | 350 | | 2024-07-02 | 0 | 350 | | 2024-07-03 | 0 | 120 | +------------------+---------+----------+
Explanation:
Note: The output table is ordered by transaction_date in ascending order.
Problem summary: Table: transactions +------------------+------+ | Column Name | Type | +------------------+------+ | transaction_id | int | | amount | int | | transaction_date | date | +------------------+------+ The transactions_id column uniquely identifies each row in this table. Each row of this table contains the transaction id, amount and transaction date. Write a solution to find the sum of amounts for odd and even transactions for each day. If there are no odd or even transactions for a specific date, display as 0. Return the result table ordered by transaction_date in ascending order. The result format is in the following example.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
{"headers":{"transactions":["transaction_id","amount","transaction_date"]},"rows":{"transactions":[[1,150,"2024-07-01"],[2,200,"2024-07-01"],[3,75,"2024-07-01"],[4,300,"2024-07-02"],[5,50,"2024-07-02"],[6,120,"2024-07-03"]]}}Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3220: Odd and Even Transactions
// Auto-generated Java example from py.
class Solution {
public void exampleSolution() {
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #3220: Odd and Even Transactions
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def sum_daily_odd_even(transactions: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// transactions["odd_sum"] = transactions["amount"].where(
// transactions["amount"] % 2 == 1, 0
// )
// transactions["even_sum"] = transactions["amount"].where(
// transactions["amount"] % 2 == 0, 0
// )
//
// result = (
// transactions.groupby("transaction_date")
// .agg(odd_sum=("odd_sum", "sum"), even_sum=("even_sum", "sum"))
// .reset_index()
// )
//
// result = result.sort_values("transaction_date")
//
// return result
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3220: Odd and Even Transactions
// Auto-generated Go example from py.
func exampleSolution() {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #3220: Odd and Even Transactions
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def sum_daily_odd_even(transactions: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// transactions["odd_sum"] = transactions["amount"].where(
// transactions["amount"] % 2 == 1, 0
// )
// transactions["even_sum"] = transactions["amount"].where(
// transactions["amount"] % 2 == 0, 0
// )
//
// result = (
// transactions.groupby("transaction_date")
// .agg(odd_sum=("odd_sum", "sum"), even_sum=("even_sum", "sum"))
// .reset_index()
// )
//
// result = result.sort_values("transaction_date")
//
// return result
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3220: Odd and Even Transactions
import pandas as pd
def sum_daily_odd_even(transactions: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
transactions["odd_sum"] = transactions["amount"].where(
transactions["amount"] % 2 == 1, 0
)
transactions["even_sum"] = transactions["amount"].where(
transactions["amount"] % 2 == 0, 0
)
result = (
transactions.groupby("transaction_date")
.agg(odd_sum=("odd_sum", "sum"), even_sum=("even_sum", "sum"))
.reset_index()
)
result = result.sort_values("transaction_date")
return result
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3220: Odd and Even Transactions
// Rust example auto-generated from py reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #3220: Odd and Even Transactions
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def sum_daily_odd_even(transactions: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// transactions["odd_sum"] = transactions["amount"].where(
// transactions["amount"] % 2 == 1, 0
// )
// transactions["even_sum"] = transactions["amount"].where(
// transactions["amount"] % 2 == 0, 0
// )
//
// result = (
// transactions.groupby("transaction_date")
// .agg(odd_sum=("odd_sum", "sum"), even_sum=("even_sum", "sum"))
// .reset_index()
// )
//
// result = result.sort_values("transaction_date")
//
// return result
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3220: Odd and Even Transactions
// Auto-generated TypeScript example from py.
function exampleSolution(): void {
}
// Reference (py):
// # Accepted solution for LeetCode #3220: Odd and Even Transactions
// import pandas as pd
//
//
// def sum_daily_odd_even(transactions: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
// transactions["odd_sum"] = transactions["amount"].where(
// transactions["amount"] % 2 == 1, 0
// )
// transactions["even_sum"] = transactions["amount"].where(
// transactions["amount"] % 2 == 0, 0
// )
//
// result = (
// transactions.groupby("transaction_date")
// .agg(odd_sum=("odd_sum", "sum"), even_sum=("even_sum", "sum"))
// .reset_index()
// )
//
// result = result.sort_values("transaction_date")
//
// return result
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.