Off-by-one on range boundaries
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.
Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using core interview patterns strategy.
You are given a string target.
Alice is going to type target on her computer using a special keyboard that has only two keys:
"a" to the string on the screen."c" changes to "d" and "z" changes to "a".Note that initially there is an empty string "" on the screen, so she can only press key 1.
Return a list of all strings that appear on the screen as Alice types target, in the order they appear, using the minimum key presses.
Example 1:
Input: target = "abc"
Output: ["a","aa","ab","aba","abb","abc"]
Explanation:
The sequence of key presses done by Alice are:
"a"."aa"."ab"."aba"."abb"."abc".Example 2:
Input: target = "he"
Output: ["a","b","c","d","e","f","g","h","ha","hb","hc","hd","he"]
Constraints:
1 <= target.length <= 400target consists only of lowercase English letters.Problem summary: You are given a string target. Alice is going to type target on her computer using a special keyboard that has only two keys: Key 1 appends the character "a" to the string on the screen. Key 2 changes the last character of the string on the screen to its next character in the English alphabet. For example, "c" changes to "d" and "z" changes to "a". Note that initially there is an empty string "" on the screen, so she can only press key 1. Return a list of all strings that appear on the screen as Alice types target, in the order they appear, using the minimum key presses.
Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.
Pattern signal: General problem-solving
"abc"
"he"
keyboard-row)Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3324: Find the Sequence of Strings Appeared on the Screen
class Solution {
public List<String> stringSequence(String target) {
List<String> ans = new ArrayList<>();
for (char c : target.toCharArray()) {
String s = ans.isEmpty() ? "" : ans.get(ans.size() - 1);
for (char a = 'a'; a <= c; ++a) {
String t = s + a;
ans.add(t);
}
}
return ans;
}
}
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3324: Find the Sequence of Strings Appeared on the Screen
func stringSequence(target string) (ans []string) {
for _, c := range target {
s := ""
if len(ans) > 0 {
s = ans[len(ans)-1]
}
for a := 'a'; a <= c; a++ {
t := s + string(a)
ans = append(ans, t)
}
}
return
}
# Accepted solution for LeetCode #3324: Find the Sequence of Strings Appeared on the Screen
class Solution:
def stringSequence(self, target: str) -> List[str]:
ans = []
for c in target:
s = ans[-1] if ans else ""
for a in ascii_lowercase:
t = s + a
ans.append(t)
if a == c:
break
return ans
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3324: Find the Sequence of Strings Appeared on the Screen
// Rust example auto-generated from java reference.
// Replace the signature and local types with the exact LeetCode harness for this problem.
impl Solution {
pub fn rust_example() {
// Port the logic from the reference block below.
}
}
// Reference (java):
// // Accepted solution for LeetCode #3324: Find the Sequence of Strings Appeared on the Screen
// class Solution {
// public List<String> stringSequence(String target) {
// List<String> ans = new ArrayList<>();
// for (char c : target.toCharArray()) {
// String s = ans.isEmpty() ? "" : ans.get(ans.size() - 1);
// for (char a = 'a'; a <= c; ++a) {
// String t = s + a;
// ans.add(t);
// }
// }
// return ans;
// }
// }
// Accepted solution for LeetCode #3324: Find the Sequence of Strings Appeared on the Screen
function stringSequence(target: string): string[] {
const ans: string[] = [];
for (const c of target) {
let s = ans.length > 0 ? ans[ans.length - 1] : '';
for (let a = 'a'.charCodeAt(0); a <= c.charCodeAt(0); a++) {
const t = s + String.fromCharCode(a);
ans.push(t);
}
}
return ans;
}
Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.
Two nested loops check every pair or subarray. The outer loop fixes a starting point, the inner loop extends or searches. For n elements this gives up to n²/2 operations. No extra space, but the quadratic time is prohibitive for large inputs.
Most array problems have an O(n²) brute force (nested loops) and an O(n) optimal (single pass with clever state tracking). The key is identifying what information to maintain as you scan: a running max, a prefix sum, a hash map of seen values, or two pointers.
Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.
Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.
Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.
Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.