LeetCode #334 — MEDIUM

Increasing Triplet Subsequence

Move from brute-force thinking to an efficient approach using array strategy.

The Problem

Problem Statement

Given an integer array nums, return true if there exists a triple of indices (i, j, k) such that i < j < k and nums[i] < nums[j] < nums[k]. If no such indices exists, return false.

Example 1:

Input: nums = [1,2,3,4,5]
Output: true
Explanation: Any triplet where i < j < k is valid.

Example 2:

Input: nums = [5,4,3,2,1]
Output: false
Explanation: No triplet exists.

Example 3:

Input: nums = [2,1,5,0,4,6]
Output: true
Explanation: One of the valid triplet is (1, 4, 5), because nums[1] == 1 < nums[4] == 4 < nums[5] == 6.

Constraints:

1 <= nums.length <= 5 * 10⁵
-2³¹ <= nums[i] <= 2³¹ - 1

Follow up: Could you implement a solution that runs in O(n) time complexity and O(1) space complexity?

Step 01

Brute Force Baseline

Problem summary: Given an integer array nums, return true if there exists a triple of indices (i, j, k) such that i < j < k and nums[i] < nums[j] < nums[k]. If no such indices exists, return false.

Baseline thinking

Start with the most direct exhaustive search. That gives a correctness anchor before optimizing.

Pattern signal: Array · Greedy

Example 1

[1,2,3,4,5]

Example 2

[5,4,3,2,1]

Example 3

[2,1,5,0,4,6]

Core Insight

What unlocks the optimal approach

No official hints in dataset. Start from constraints and look for a monotonic or reusable state.

Interview move: turn each hint into an invariant you can check after every iteration/recursion step.

Step 03

Algorithm Walkthrough

Iteration Checklist

Define state (indices, window, stack, map, DP cell, or recursion frame).
Apply one transition step and update the invariant.
Record answer candidate when condition is met.
Continue until all input is consumed.

Use the first example testcase as your mental trace to verify each transition.

Step 04

Edge Cases

Minimum Input

Single element / shortest valid input

Validate boundary behavior before entering the main loop or recursion.

Duplicates & Repeats

Repeated values / repeated states

Decide whether duplicates should be merged, skipped, or counted explicitly.

Extreme Constraints

Upper-end input sizes

Re-check complexity target against constraints to avoid time-limit issues.

Invalid / Corner Shape

Empty collections, zeros, or disconnected structures

Handle special-case structure before the core algorithm path.

Step 05

Full Annotated Code

Source-backed implementations are provided below for direct study and interview prep.

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #334: Increasing Triplet Subsequence
class Solution {
    public boolean increasingTriplet(int[] nums) {
        int min = Integer.MAX_VALUE, mid = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
        for (int num : nums) {
            if (num > mid) {
                return true;
            }
            if (num <= min) {
                min = num;
            } else {
                mid = num;
            }
        }
        return false;
    }
}

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #334: Increasing Triplet Subsequence
func increasingTriplet(nums []int) bool {
	min, mid := math.MaxInt32, math.MaxInt32
	for _, num := range nums {
		if num > mid {
			return true
		}
		if num <= min {
			min = num
		} else {
			mid = num
		}
	}
	return false
}

# Accepted solution for LeetCode #334: Increasing Triplet Subsequence
class Solution:
    def increasingTriplet(self, nums: List[int]) -> bool:
        mi, mid = inf, inf
        for num in nums:
            if num > mid:
                return True
            if num <= mi:
                mi = num
            else:
                mid = num
        return False

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #334: Increasing Triplet Subsequence
impl Solution {
    pub fn increasing_triplet(nums: Vec<i32>) -> bool {
        let n = nums.len();
        if n < 3 {
            return false;
        }
        let mut min = i32::MAX;
        let mut mid = i32::MAX;
        for num in nums.into_iter() {
            if num <= min {
                min = num;
            } else if num <= mid {
                mid = num;
            } else {
                return true;
            }
        }
        false
    }
}

// Accepted solution for LeetCode #334: Increasing Triplet Subsequence
function increasingTriplet(nums: number[]): boolean {
    let n = nums.length;
    if (n < 3) return false;
    let min = nums[0],
        mid = Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER;
    for (let num of nums) {
        if (num <= min) {
            min = num;
        } else if (num <= mid) {
            mid = num;
        } else if (num > mid) {
            return true;
        }
    }
    return false;
}

Step 06

Interactive Study Demo

Use this to step through a reusable interview workflow for this problem.

Custom checkpoints (one per line)

Press Step or Run All to begin.

Step 07

Complexity Analysis

Time

O(n log n)

Space

O(1)

Approach Breakdown

EXHAUSTIVE

O(2ⁿ) time

O(n) space

Try every possible combination of choices. With n items each having two states (include/exclude), the search space is 2ⁿ. Evaluating each combination takes O(n), giving O(n × 2ⁿ). The recursion stack or subset storage uses O(n) space.

GREEDY

O(n log n) time

O(1) space

Greedy algorithms typically sort the input (O(n log n)) then make a single pass (O(n)). The sort dominates. If the input is already sorted or the greedy choice can be computed without sorting, time drops to O(n). Proving greedy correctness (exchange argument) is harder than the implementation.

Shortcut: Sort + single pass → O(n log n). If no sort needed → O(n). The hard part is proving it works.

Coach Notes

Common Mistakes

Review these before coding to avoid predictable interview regressions.

Off-by-one on range boundaries

Wrong move: Loop endpoints miss first/last candidate.

Usually fails on: Fails on minimal arrays and exact-boundary answers.

Fix: Re-derive loops from inclusive/exclusive ranges before coding.

Using greedy without proof

Wrong move: Locally optimal choices may fail globally.

Usually fails on: Counterexamples appear on crafted input orderings.

Fix: Verify with exchange argument or monotonic objective before committing.